Simo Sorce writes:
> they address all concerns except for adding the CET_SECTION macro
> automagically to all asm files.
Thanks. I commented on that issue in my other mail.
> I also added a patch to deal with the missing epilogues.
Applied now.
BTW are there any git experts here? I often appl
Simo Sorce writes:
> Ok attached find new patches,
> they address all concerns except for adding the CET_SECTION macro
> automagically to all asm files.
Ah, one more thing:
> +define(,
> + +<.pushsection .note.gnu.property,"a"
How portable is .pushsection? If we ensure that notes are last, pla
On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 22:31 +0200, Niels Möller wrote:
> Simo Sorce writes:
>
> > I understand this is not a high bar, and I will fold the segment note
> > in if you think that is what we should do, but I wanted to make you
> > aware of why I did not do the same as what we do with the stack note.
Oh sorry I did not see this email and the previous before sending my
new patches.
About git, generally git am wants to be applied in order, but I think
there may be a fuzz option to git too, never really investigated as I
usually apply all patches to a branch (or pull that branch directly
from PR
