ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
> Maamoun TK writes:
>
>> The last patch follows the C implementation but I just figured out a decent
>> way to do it.
>
> Thanks! Applied, and pushed on the ppc-chacha-core branch for testing.
> (Had apply it semi-manually, since the file to patch
Maamoun TK writes:
Thanks for the update. This is quite complex for me. I have not yet read
the code very carefully. I think I'd like to focus on the main function,
gcm_hash, first. Some questions and suggestions, to make it easier:
1. Take out the fat support to it's own patch.
2. You could
Maamoun TK writes:
> I posted a performance test here
> https://lists.lysator.liu.se/pipermail/nettle-bugs/2020/009169.html
> Personally, I prefer keeping the altivec version in nettle library since
> it's faster than C implementation but I'm not sure whether the performance
> margin fits with
Maamoun TK writes:
> The last patch follows the C implementation but I just figured out a decent
> way to do it.
Thanks! Applied, and pushed on the ppc-chacha-core branch for testing.
(Had apply it semi-manually, since the file to patch indents using TAB
and those were replaced by spaces in the
I posted a performance test here
https://lists.lysator.liu.se/pipermail/nettle-bugs/2020/009169.html
Personally, I prefer keeping the altivec version in nettle library since
it's faster than C implementation but I'm not sure whether the performance
margin fits with the library's convention of
