Maamoun TK writes:
>> I've tried out a split, see below patch. It's a rather large change,
>> moving pieces to new places, but nothing difficult. I'm considering
>> committing this to the s390x branch, what do you think?
>>
>
> I agree, I'll modify the patch of basic AES-128 optimized functions
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 9:18 PM Niels Möller wrote:
> The reason it makes sense to me to split
> aes-encrypt.c, is that:
>
> (i) It's more consistent with the other aes-related functions.
>
> (ii) The current aes-encrypt.c contains both the encryption functions
> aes128_encrypt,
