On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 10:06 PM Niels Möller wrote:
> "Christopher M. Riedl" writes:
>
> > So in total, if we assume an ideal (but impossible) zero-cost version
> > for memxor, memxor3, and gcm_fill and avoid permutes via ISA 3.0 vector
> > load/stores we can only account for 11.82
I've mentioned it in the README file.
---
arm64/README | 7 +++
arm64/crypto/sha1-compress.asm | 6 --
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arm64/README b/arm64/README
index d2745d57..206bb773 100644
--- a/arm64/README
+++ b/arm64/README
@@
"Christopher M. Riedl" writes:
> So in total, if we assume an ideal (but impossible) zero-cost version
> for memxor, memxor3, and gcm_fill and avoid permutes via ISA 3.0 vector
> load/stores we can only account for 11.82 cycles/block; leaving 4.97
> cycles/block as an additional benefit of the
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 9:16 PM Niels Möller wrote:
> Maamoun TK writes:
>
> > I've written the patch from scratch while keeping in mind how to use the
> > SHA-1 instructions of Arm64 crypto extension from sha1-arm.c in Jeffrey's
> > repository.
>
> If that is the case, avoid phrases like
Maamoun TK writes:
> I've written the patch from scratch while keeping in mind how to use the
> SHA-1 instructions of Arm64 crypto extension from sha1-arm.c in Jeffrey's
> repository.
If that is the case, avoid phrases like "based on" which are easily
misread as implying it's a derived work in
