On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 22:58 +0100, Niels Möller wrote:
> Amitay Isaacs writes:
>
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/powerpc64/ecc-secp256r1-redc.asm
> > @@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
> > +C powerpc64/ecc-secp256r1-redc.asm
> > +ifelse(`
> > + Copyright (C) 2021 Amitay Isaacs & Martin Schwenke, IBM
> >
Hi Niels,
On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 22:29 +0100, Niels Möller wrote:
> ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
>
> > I think the approach should apply to other 64-bit archs (should
> > probably
> > work also on x86_64, where it's sometimes tricky to avoid x86_64
> > instructions clobbering the
ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
> I think the approach should apply to other 64-bit archs (should probably
> work also on x86_64, where it's sometimes tricky to avoid x86_64
> instructions clobbering the carry flag when it should be preserved, but
> probably not so difficult in this
Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang
---
nettle.texinfo | 74 --
1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/nettle.texinfo b/nettle.texinfo
index 39d01159..76934637 100644
--- a/nettle.texinfo
+++ b/nettle.texinfo
@@ -950,6 +950,52 @@
Hi Niels,
On 12/3/21 4:09 AM, Niels Möller wrote:
Tianjia Zhang writes:
Hi Niels,
Would you mind writing a short description of the algorithm for the
manual? I think it should go under "Miscellaneous hash functions". Would
be nice with some brief background on this hash function (origin,
"Jayakumar, Jaikanth" writes:
> There is a small confusion, I believe the bug reported here
> (https://lists.lysator.liu.se/pipermail/nettle-bugs/2021/009457.html)
> is related to CVE-2021-20305, right ? and this (CVE-2021-20305) is
> fixed in version 3.7.2.
Which *two* problems are you asking
