On 7/08/22 01:17, Niels Möller wrote:
Hi,
I'm considering deleting some assembly files for older architectures and
older algorithms. They will still be supported via the corresponding C
implementations, just (likely) slower. Why do that? I see two reasons:
1. Delete code that it's no longer eas
Brad Smith writes:
> I'm fine with mips64 for *BSD and Linux.
Let's do that then.
> I am just not sure about triples for Irix which is why the MIPS case
> was added in the first place
I'm afraid keeping irix-specific things working needs some help from
irix users (if there still are any?). Cu
Magnus Holmgren writes:
> Tracking which internal symbols exist on different architectures to avoid
> errors and warnings when generating the symbols files for Debian is a major
> PITA, but I should probably give up on that and simply tag them all
> "optional".
Ignoring internal symbols (base
