Hello,
NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
> I can test with Clang 17. I'll test.
The particular tests (using valgrind) do not fail with Clang 17. I
checked the assembler output, and confirmed no issues.
With artifically modified source (so that it can replicate cnd_copy problem):
==
Hello,
Niels Möller wrote:
> 1. Do the changes on branch
>https://git.lysator.liu.se/nettle/nettle/-/tree/sc-is_zero?ref_type=heads
>help?
Yes. It helps. I confirmed the function cnd_copy has no problem
with the change (removing != 0, and require callers to use 0/1),
for the cases I
NIIBE Yutaka writes:
> I checked other compilers today.
Thanks for investigating! Questions:
1. Do the changes on branch
https://git.lysator.liu.se/nettle/nettle/-/tree/sc-is_zero?ref_type=heads
help?
2. If you install valgrind (including header files), do the recently
added tests
