Hi Niels :)
"Niels Möller" writes:
> I've now merged OCB support to the master branch. Some changes from the
> development branch:
Sweet! I can confirm that it performs as expected on our test vectors.
> * I moved the corresponding nettle_aead struct to an internal heade
I've now merged OCB support to the master branch. Some changes from the
development branch:
* I added space for one extra block to struct ocb_key (making it 64
bytes rather than 48). Currently unused, but available for future
optimization.
* I moved the corresponding nettle_aead struct
Niels Möller writes:
> My current understanding is that the most important improvement over the
> initial implementation is to call the underlying block cipher with more
> than one block at a time (enabling parallelism on some hardware, and
> reducing overhead).
I've kept doing this, but going
ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
> A nettle release reasonable soon would be good, but I'm afraid it will
> be a bit tight to fit to the debian schedule. In the best case, we could
> have a release out around new year or early January. I guess it likely
> counts as a "transition", even
Justus Winter writes:
> Thanks for working on OCB. As you may know, the Debian freeze is coming
> up (as in really soon, starting next month or so), and it would be great
> to have OCB in Nettle in the next version of Debian.
Thanks for encouragement. Any feedback on the development branch
Hi Niels :)
ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
> Hi, when working on OCB, and trying to have some consistency between
> similar functions, I'm looking at the various "all-in-one"
> *_message_encrypt and *_message_decrypt functions. They are motivated in
> part by convenience, for
