Re: WPA status 2006-01-08

2006-01-09 Thread Nikolaus Filus
Hi, On Sunday 08 January 2006 22:48, Dan Williams wrote: *) Your driver probably doesn't support WPA quite enough; you'll need a driver that does WEXT-18 or higher. This means that it needs to set the enc_capa bits on return from the SIOCGIWRANGE call, which only hostap seems to do right

Re: WPA status 2006-01-08

2006-01-09 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 10:58 +0100, Nikolaus Filus wrote: Hi, On Sunday 08 January 2006 22:48, Dan Williams wrote: *) Your driver probably doesn't support WPA quite enough; you'll need a driver that does WEXT-18 or higher. This means that it needs to set the enc_capa bits on return

Re: WPA status 2006-01-08

2006-01-09 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 10:55 -0500, Robert Love wrote: On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 16:48 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: *) Your driver probably doesn't support WPA quite enough; you'll need a driver that does WEXT-18 or higher. This means that it needs to set the enc_capa bits on return from the

Re: WPA status 2006-01-08

2006-01-09 Thread Robert Love
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 11:11 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: Just to use WPA. All cards should support WEP already since you don't need fancy calls to do that... Unless wpa_supplicant is trying to be clever. Seems to be. SIOCSIWAUTH not being supported shuts the whole process down. This is an

Re: WPA status 2006-01-08

2006-01-09 Thread Robert Love
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 11:16 -0500, Robert Love wrote: Seems to be. SIOCSIWAUTH not being supported shuts the whole process down. This is an Atheros. Alright, got it working. Nice! I still see a boatload of SIOCSIWAUTH Operation not supported errors. But, whatever. Is 0.4.7 + your patch

Re: WPA status 2006-01-08

2006-01-09 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 11:31 -0500, Robert Love wrote: On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 11:16 -0500, Robert Love wrote: Seems to be. SIOCSIWAUTH not being supported shuts the whole process down. This is an Atheros. Alright, got it working. Nice! I still see a boatload of SIOCSIWAUTH Operation

Re: WPA status 2006-01-08

2006-01-09 Thread Robert Love
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 11:46 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: I think 0.4.7 is OK, I'm using HEAD but looking at the changelog there's not much that should affect functionality since before Christmas at least. I think at the very least we should make sure 0.4.7 works correctly for us, and patch it

Re: WPA status 2006-01-08

2006-01-09 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 12:02 -0500, Robert Love wrote: On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 11:46 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: I think 0.4.7 is OK, I'm using HEAD but looking at the changelog there's not much that should affect functionality since before Christmas at least. I think at the very least we

Re: WPA status 2006-01-08

2006-01-09 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 10:55 -0500, Robert Love wrote: On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 16:48 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: *) Your driver probably doesn't support WPA quite enough; you'll need a driver that does WEXT-18 or higher. This means that it needs to set the enc_capa bits on return from the

Re: WPA status 2006-01-08

2006-01-09 Thread Robert Love
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 12:18 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: Note that while wpa_supplicant supports using driver-specific methods for WPA and other settings, we want to push all drivers towards conforming to the WEXT spec on this one. That means support for SIOCSIWAUTH and SIOCSIWENCODEEXT. We

Re: NM HEAD 1.721 AP_SCAN patched.]

2006-01-09 Thread Bill Moss
Yesterday, I built 1.710 which did not use the bogus AP_SCAN ctrl command and it worked fine. Today, I build 1.721 and the bug log showed the following because the invalid AP_SCAN ctrl command had been added to the NM code. Jan 9 12:45:43 localhost NetworkManager: information SUP: sending

WPA and CCMP

2006-01-09 Thread James Ettle
I've been playing around with CCMP (AES). I've found that if I first associate with TKIP, and then /system/networking/wireless/networks/ssid/we_cipher to 8 in gconf, NetworkManager then tells wpa_supplicant to use CCMP. It then goes on to authenticate and pick up an IP address. Although

Re: NM HEAD 1.721 AP_SCAN patched.

2006-01-09 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 14:38 -0500, Robert Love wrote: On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 14:27 -0500, Bill Moss wrote: 3. NM is now connecting at home with broadcast essid and at work with hidden essid. Was it not working before? It will fail out and refuse to connect if AP_SCAN can't be set.

Re: WPA and CCMP

2006-01-09 Thread Dan Williams
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 00:08 +, James Ettle wrote: I've been playing around with CCMP (AES). I've found that if I first associate with TKIP, and then /system/networking/wireless/networks/ssid/we_cipher to 8 in gconf, NetworkManager then tells wpa_supplicant to use CCMP. It then goes on to

Re: WPA status 2006-01-08

2006-01-09 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 12:27 -0500, Robert Love wrote: On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 12:18 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: Note that while wpa_supplicant supports using driver-specific methods for WPA and other settings, we want to push all drivers towards conforming to the WEXT spec on this one. That

Re: NM HEAD 1.721 AP_SCAN patched.]

2006-01-09 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 15:19 -0500, Bill Moss wrote: Yesterday, I built 1.710 which did not use the bogus AP_SCAN ctrl command and it worked fine. Today, I build 1.721 and the bug log showed the following because the invalid AP_SCAN ctrl command had been added to the NM code. Jan 9 12:45:43

HEAD 1.721 w/ patched wpa_supplicant 0.5.0

2006-01-09 Thread Bill Moss
1. Patched wpa_supplicant-0.5.0 using Dan's patch at http://people.redhat.com/dcbw/wpa_supplicant-ctrl-iface-ap-scan.patch and the .config file CONFIG_WIRELESS_EXTENSION=y CONFIG_DRIVER_WEXT=y CONFIG_DRIVER_WIRED=y CONFIG_IEEE8021X_EAPOL=y CONFIG_EAP_MD5=y CONFIG_EAP_MSCHAPV2=y