Hi Ian,
It's possibly not related to my problem but are you using a shared
key(restricted)?
Rob.
Ian Campbell wrote:
I'm having a strange problem with NetworkManager 0.5.1 and 0.5.2 from
2006-02-21 (The two current builds in the Gentopia portage overlay)b
NetworkManager will set the essid a
I'm having a strange problem with NetworkManager 0.5.1 and 0.5.2 from
2006-02-21 (The two current builds in the Gentopia portage overlay)
NetworkManager will set the essid and the wep key for the network properly,
it'll get an ip address and set a route, and then it will just... hang there,
spinni
* Robert Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-01 22:10]:
> On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 21:49 -0500, Brian Magnuson wrote:
>
> > Confirmed. The 2nd hunk doesn't appear to be needed. Just the first diff
> > wrapping the set_mode in an if() is needed.
>
> Excellent!
>
> Thanks for the good work.
No probl
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 21:49 -0500, Brian Magnuson wrote:
> Confirmed. The 2nd hunk doesn't appear to be needed. Just the first diff
> wrapping the set_mode in an if() is needed.
Excellent!
Thanks for the good work.
> P.S. While I was trying out various things I got one of these. After this I
* Robert Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-01 21:30]:
> On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 20:43 -0500, Brian Magnuson wrote:
>
> > Ah, I see. Ok, so something like this might be more appropriate?
> > Basically
> > back to the original posters concept. More elses could be added as
> > appropriate.
>
> Ye
Hi,
I've forwarded this to the list. I don't think it got through because I
joined the list shortly after sending it.
Rob.
Original Message
Subject:Re: shared key FC5 Test 3
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 13:56:15 +0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 20:43 -0500, Brian Magnuson wrote:
> Ah, I see. Ok, so something like this might be more appropriate? Basically
> back to the original posters concept. More elses could be added as
> appropriate.
Yes, this is exactly what I had in mind. Good work!
> Additionally I move
* Robert Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-01 20:19]:
>
> wpa_supplicant drivers and kernel drivers are two different things.
>
> the get_driver() function returns the kernel driver.
>
> you are passing that in where we request the wpa_supplicant driver. it
> won't work for most drivers.
>
> w
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 20:10 -0500, Brian Magnuson wrote:
> Sorry I don't follow you here. My 2nd patch (I think) handles the cases for
> the other supplicant drivers. I admittedly don't really know anything about
> the control connect to wpa_supplicant that I'm messing with here but it does
> se
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 20:00 -0500, Brian Magnuson wrote:
> No, but it seemed pretty uncontroversial. Could be less so by switching that
> check to != IW_MODE_INFRA. I agree though that it's not obvious why this
> would be needed at all.
The real thing that bothers me is putting the set_frequenc
* Robert Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-01 19:54]:
> On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 19:38 -0500, Brian Magnuson wrote:
>
> > Appears to be ok. Comments?
>
> Unfortunately, it won't work for everyone. There are only a handful of
> wpa_supplicant drivers. ndiswrapper just happens to be one of them.
>
* Robert Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-01 19:54]:
> On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 19:31 -0500, Brian Magnuson wrote:
>
> >
> > --- src/nm-device-802-11-wireless.c 2006-02-21 11:39:33.0 +0100
> > +++ src/nm-device-802-11-wireless.c 2006-03-01 19:06:34.0 +0100
> > @@ -1808,8 +1808,10 @@
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 19:31 -0500, Brian Magnuson wrote:
>
> --- src/nm-device-802-11-wireless.c 2006-02-21 11:39:33.0 +0100
> +++ src/nm-device-802-11-wireless.c 2006-03-01 19:06:34.0 +0100
> @@ -1808,8 +1808,10 @@
> /* Must be in infrastructure mode dur
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 19:38 -0500, Brian Magnuson wrote:
> Appears to be ok. Comments?
Unfortunately, it won't work for everyone. There are only a handful of
wpa_supplicant drivers. ndiswrapper just happens to be one of them.
Robert Love
_
* Brian Magnuson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-01 19:36]:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-01 18:29]:
> >
> > This patch created by me solve the problem:
> >
>
> After de-mangling this patch seems to work. I haven't done much
> testing but this keeps me online for more than a c
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-01 18:29]:
>
> This patch created by me solve the problem:
>
After de-mangling this patch seems to work. I haven't done much
testing but this keeps me online for more than a couple of seconds. I've
undone the line-wrapping, fixed the indentation
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 16:08 -0500, Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'm trying to connect to a friend's network using nm-openvpn. However
> I'm also using nm-vpnc to connect to my university wifi network and to
> reach the net.
>
> When I activate the openvpn VPN, vpnc quits a few seconds later
Hi all
I'm trying to connect to a friend's network using nm-openvpn. However
I'm also using nm-vpnc to connect to my university wifi network and to
reach the net.
When I activate the openvpn VPN, vpnc quits a few seconds later and of
course openvpn fails since it can't reach the net.
Is th
This patch created by me solve the problem:
Index: src/nm-device-802-11-wireless.c
===
RCS file:
/cvs/gnome/NetworkManager/src/nm-device-802-11-wireless.c,v
--- src/nm-device-802-11-wireless.c 2006-02-21
11:39:33.0 +0100
This patch created by me solve the problem:
Index: src/nm-device-802-11-wireless.c
===
RCS file:
/cvs/gnome/NetworkManager/src/nm-device-802-11-wireless.c,v
--- src/nm-device-802-11-wireless.c 2006-02-21
11:39:33.0 +0100
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 13:51 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The problem is in ../src/nm-device-802-11-wireless.c at
> function "static gboolean nm_device_802_11_wireless_scan
> (gpointer user_data)". Probe to substitute with:
>
> static gboolean
> nm_device_802_11_wireless_scan (gpointer use
The problem is in ../src/nm-device-802-11-wireless.c at
function "static gboolean nm_device_802_11_wireless_scan
(gpointer user_data)". Probe to substitute with:
static gboolean
nm_device_802_11_wireless_scan (gpointer user_data)
{
return FALSE;
}
The problem is in ../src/nm-device-802-11-wireless.c at
function "static gboolean nm_device_802_11_wireless_scan
(gpointer user_data)". Probe to substitute with:
static gboolean
nm_device_802_11_wireless_scan (gpointer user_data)
{
return FALSE;
}
23 matches
Mail list logo
