Hi
Attached patch fixes a warning on 64-bit systems and includes
instead of as libc headers should generally be preferred to
linux kernel headers, AFAIK; this fixes build on systems where
linux/if.h doesn't get installed as glibc already provides the necessary
structs and defines.
Ok to commit?
Hi
Attached patch adds basic support for the GNU/Linux distribution
paldo[1] to NetworkManager. Distro detection in configure uses
lsb_release, I hope that's ok.
Ok to commit?
Can I commit future fixes for the paldo backend without explicit
approval?
Regards,
Jürg
[1] http://www.paldo.org/
di
Ok, so I was able to at least fix the open network connection by
shutting down iptables. Not my most favorite thing in the world to do
on a public WiFi network. So I have a request:
Can Network Manager modify the local firewall as needed for
connectivity. IE before NetworkManager sends a reques
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 17:32 +, Jon Escombe wrote:
> From memory, if I enter insufficient values into the WPA Enterprise
> dialog, NM will happily launch wpa_supplicant with what it's been given.
Correct. There are myriad possible configurations and I simply did not
check for any specific
Dan Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 10:58 -0500, Robert Love wrote:
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 14:37 +, Jon Escombe wrote:
Grr, let me try that again...
Nice work.
So you've posted three patches (well, two different sets). I think all
of the fixes look right, particularly the changes i
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 10:58 -0500, Robert Love wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 14:37 +, Jon Escombe wrote:
>
> > Grr, let me try that again...
>
> Nice work.
>
> So you've posted three patches (well, two different sets). I think all
> of the fixes look right, particularly the changes in the
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 14:37 +, Jon Escombe wrote:
> Grr, let me try that again...
Nice work.
So you've posted three patches (well, two different sets). I think all
of the fixes look right, particularly the changes in the latest patch.
Would you mind rediffing a single patch (assuming you s
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 07:23 -0800, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> I've been working with more documentation for wpa_supplicant
> configuration and one part of this is a "configuration wizard" that can
> be used to generate example configurations. It is not yet complete and
> is likely to miss something. A
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 03:34:07PM -0500, Robert Love wrote:
> So I have two questions: what are the EAP versions of the 2nd
> authentications? E.g., what is "EAP-TTLS/EAP-MSCHAPv2" and how does it
> differ from "EAP-TTLS/MSCHAPv2" ?
EAP-TTLS allows phase 2 (tunneled) authentication to use both
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 09:59 -0500, Robert Love wrote:
> So this was totally supposed to be a private email to Dan.
>
> And I am totally an idiot.
>
> At least I did not begin the email with my usual greeting to Dan,
> "Sweetest Dan" and then talk about how we both enjoy covering ourselves
> in th
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 10:05 -0500, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> Not sure about Dan, but I've been giving several talks about NM.
> I've got another one coming up at FUDCon in two weeks. I was asked
> to submit it to GUADEC, but haven't had time to do so yet.
Alright, so maybe NM is covered.
Robert Love wrote:
Dan,
Are you going to GUADEC?
Are you talking?
Are you talking on NM?
If you are going, I'd love to get together. It makes sense to traverse
the Atlantic in order to meet. Maybe we can do some NM loving there.
If you are not talking on NM, I think I'll submit a talk.
So this was totally supposed to be a private email to Dan.
And I am totally an idiot.
At least I did not begin the email with my usual greeting to Dan,
"Sweetest Dan" and then talk about how we both enjoy covering ourselves
in the blood of squirrels and singing old Floyd songs backwards.
Please
Dan,
Are you going to GUADEC?
Are you talking?
Are you talking on NM?
If you are going, I'd love to get together. It makes sense to traverse
the Atlantic in order to meet. Maybe we can do some NM loving there.
If you are not talking on NM, I think I'll submit a talk. I need to
find somet
Jon Escombe dresco.co.uk> writes:
> Patch follows inline (can't post as an attachment from here - so can only
> apologise if the formatting gets messed up)
Grr, let me try that again...
diff -urN NetworkManager.orig/gnome/applet/nm-gconf-wso.c
NetworkManager.patched/gnome/applet/nm-gconf-wso.c
Dan Williams redhat.com> writes:
> See if the applet gets the key required dbus method call, the code for
> which is probably in applet-dbus-info.c. The applet is supposed (1) to
> serve that info from the gnome-keyring, or (2) if it doesn't find it
> there, pop up a dialog to get it. If (1), i
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 13:44 +0100, Jan wrote:
> well this linksys access points don't have hidden essid if i remember
> correctly. i just want to get around having to type "wireless campus
> network..." every time i'm in the range of a new access point of the
> hidden university wireless lan. what
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 11:05 +, Jon Escombe wrote:
> Jon Escombe dresco.co.uk> writes:
>
> > I've found an issue which I think may be at the root of all this..
> >
> > nm_ap_security_new_from_ap() appears to match on *any* of the capabilities
> > defined for each encryption type. In my case,
well this linksys access points don't have hidden essid if i remember
correctly. i just want to get around having to type "wireless campus
network..." every time i'm in the range of a new access point of the
hidden university wireless lan. what nm should is the following:
ap: broadcast: "hidden es
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jan wrote:
>>> also, just a thought on hidden SSIDs. if the user configures
>>> NetworkManager with some SSIDs they are looking for, NetworkManager
>>> could/should probe explicitly for those as part of it's scanning
>>> process.
>> Actually, we do.
> > also, just a thought on hidden SSIDs. if the user configures
> > NetworkManager with some SSIDs they are looking for, NetworkManager
> > could/should probe explicitly for those as part of it's scanning
> > process.
>
> Actually, we do. When you scan, the hidden ESSID's show up -- just not
>
Jon Escombe dresco.co.uk> writes:
> I've found an issue which I think may be at the root of all this..
>
> nm_ap_security_new_from_ap() appears to match on *any* of the capabilities
> defined for each encryption type. In my case, my WPA2-EAP network was being
> configured as a WPA2_CCMP_PSK netw
22 matches
Mail list logo
