We can possibly tweak this, since drivers are better these days than
they used to be. The 6 minute interval was chosen a fairly long time
ago.
Great!
Scanned signal strength reported from drivers is still not reliable, but
is getting a lot better. NM cannot rely on signal strength for
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 08:32 +0100, Soren Hansen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:08:47PM -0500, steve wrote:
Does anyone have need for this type of plugin, or is this software
only useful for me?
It could definitely be useful, please share it!
+1
Dan
quality is a subjective value that usually includes things like TX
retries, decryption errors, and other connection information in addition
to signal strength. You can have a fairly high signal-to-noise ratio
but still have an overloaded radio channel with lots of collisions,
which means
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 15:17 +, yelo_3 wrote:
quality is a subjective value that usually includes things like TX
retries, decryption errors, and other connection information in addition
to signal strength. You can have a fairly high signal-to-noise ratio
but still have an overloaded
That's almost certainly a driver issue. If the driver is saying that
quality of the AP is 30%, but you cannot connect, then the driver is
wrong. The driver should be factoring all necessary information into
the quality measurement.
I will post a bug to ipw2200 tracer, thank you for the
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 19:40 +, yelo_3 wrote:
That's almost certainly a driver issue. If the driver is saying that
quality of the AP is 30%, but you cannot connect, then the driver is
wrong. The driver should be factoring all necessary information into
the quality measurement.
I
understood. how much time should pass between the two clicks to be considered
not a dos?
I truely cannot realize if the scan is done only the first time of a series of
clicks or the scan-when-click feature has been disabled because of this reason
