Hi,
just stumbled across an issue while playing around with wireless connections
in KNM.
Why does NM require specific_object to be set when connecting to a wireless
network? Shouldn't the wireless and security settings suffice? What if I want
to connect to a hidden network where no AP is avail
Hi,
Am Freitag, 14. September 2007 22:22:33 schrieb Dan Williams:
> On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 11:49 +0200, Helmut Schaa wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 13. September 2007 19:15:13 schrieb Dan Williams:
> > > Yeah, I know this is a problem at the moment, because it's unlikely NM
> > > has gotten the configur
On Thursday 27 September 2007 17:25, Patton Echols wrote:
> There's a question here, but let me tell why first . . .
>
> After hearing the vulnerability of WPA to attacks on short pre-shared
> keys, I decided to reset my wireless routers to more robust keys.
>
> Resetting Network Manager to use a d
There's a question here, but let me tell why first . . .
After hearing the vulnerability of WPA to attacks on short pre-shared
keys, I decided to reset my wireless routers to more robust keys.
Resetting Network Manager to use a different key was more of a
challenge. (I had thought that, upon fi
With wpa_supplicant I use the following settings... When will this be
implanted in NetworkManager?
network={
ssid="WLAN"
scan_ssid=1
key_mgmt=IEEE8021X
auth_alg=OPEN
eap=TTLS
# Phase1 / outer authentication
ca_cert="/usr/lib/ssl/certs/CAs.pem"
# Phase 2 / inner authentication
phase2="auth=PAP"
id
Will NM 0.7 manage PPPoA connections?
Thank you!
G.L.
--
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://heruan.my.aldu.net
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.
