On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 12:24 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Dan Williams wrote:
>
> > Any bugs/issues you feel are super-important before a 0.6.6 release?
> > I'd actually like to take a look at the SSID -> GConf hashing again
> > because I've been getting some reports of crashing there, but I'd lik
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 00:47 +0100, Cyril Jaquier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> >> Yay! vpnc now has options for the specific vendor you're trying to talk
> >> to. That just makes me sad :( No, NM vpnc plugin doesn't support that
> >> option yet...
> >
> > The culprit is nm_vpnc_properties_validate() in
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 19:58 +0100, Alban Browaeys wrote:
> Network manager is unusable here for wifi network access. The item of
> the list of access point names are made of garbage characters and
> clicking on them try to set the essid to this garbage value.
> I also have :
> NetworkManager: [12
Network manager is unusable here for wifi network access. The item of
the list of access point names are made of garbage characters and
clicking on them try to set the essid to this garbage value.
I also have :
NetworkManager: [1202745653.483173] wpa_parse_wpa_ie_wpa():
wpa_parse_wpa_ie_wpa: malf
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 23:07 +0100, Will Stephenson wrote:
> On Monday 11 February 2008 17:27:53 Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 17:26 +0100, Will Stephenson wrote:
> > > On Friday 08 February 2008, Dan Williams said:
> > > > So a simple patch to dbus-binding-tool to make it ignore nam
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 22:50 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 09:13 -0800, Alexey Neyman wrote:
>
> >>
> >> It would be nice if I could ask NM to publish its settings into system:
> >> e.g. have a check box in the passphrase dialog that instructs it to
>
Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 09:13 -0800, Alexey Neyman wrote:
>>
>> It would be nice if I could ask NM to publish its settings into system:
>> e.g. have a check box in the passphrase dialog that instructs it to
>> publish the settings system-wide.
>
> This will be available thro
On Monday 11 February 2008 09:30:51 am Dan Williams wrote:
> Well, using ifup/ifdown (s-c-n's Activate/Deactivate) is mutually
> exclusive with NetworkManager. It just happens that you can use s-c-n
> to _configure_ the device right now until we get the connection editor
> save functionality imple
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 09:59 -0800, Alexey Neyman wrote:
> On Monday 11 February 2008 09:30:51 am Dan Williams wrote:
> > Well, using ifup/ifdown (s-c-n's Activate/Deactivate) is mutually
> > exclusive with NetworkManager. It just happens that you can use s-c-n
> > to _configure_ the device right n
On Feb 11, 2008 6:30 PM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This will be available through the Connection editor; you'll be able to
> do exactly that through a button there, assuming you have the
> appropriate permissions.
Talking about permissions seems like nm-system-setting does not work
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 09:13 -0800, Alexey Neyman wrote:
> On Monday 11 February 2008 06:12:39 am Dan Williams wrote:
> > At the moment, through system-config-network, which only supports WEP
> > and unencrypted networks. I'm working on adding support to the config
> > file format for WPA and dynam
On Monday 11 February 2008 06:12:39 am Dan Williams wrote:
> At the moment, through system-config-network, which only supports WEP
> and unencrypted networks. I'm working on adding support to the config
> file format for WPA and dynamic WEP stuff. So if you set up a wireless
> connection through
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 17:26 +0100, Will Stephenson wrote:
> On Friday 08 February 2008, Dan Williams said:
> > So a simple patch to dbus-binding-tool to make it ignore namespaced
> > nodes and attributes will allow us to use the TP namespace within the
> > existing introspection XML files and avoid
On Friday 08 February 2008, Dan Williams said:
> So a simple patch to dbus-binding-tool to make it ignore namespaced
> nodes and attributes will allow us to use the TP namespace within the
> existing introspection XML files and avoid the extra step of spec/*.
Ack, maybe it does so already - but is
On Feb 11, 2008 6:10 AM, Will Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the distinction between the two files in $SUBJECT? I see that -client
> is the same as nm-manager.xml minus the legacy methods, but what is the
> background to this? Is nm-manager.xml deprecated? Should both files alway
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 09:26 -0800, Alexey Neyman wrote:
> Dan,
>
> > I built the first pass last night, svn3302, it'll get pushed to
> > F8-updates-testing in the next updates push.
> >
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=401800
> >
> > It should already notice valid ifcfg files
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 16:01 +0300, Vasiliy G Tolstov wrote:
> I'm trying to compile latest networkmanager pptp plugin from current
> trunk (rev-3304)
I don't believe the pptp plugin has been updated to the new VPN api. I'm
sure patches doing so would be welcome.
-casey
I'm trying to compile latest networkmanager pptp plugin from current
trunk (rev-3304)
Building fails with message
nm-ppp-starter.c:48:31: error: dbus-dict-helpers.h: No such file or
directory
nm-ppp-starter.c: In function 'nm_ppp_dbus_process_helper_ip4_config':
nm-ppp-starter.c:1542: warning: i
Hi list
What's the distinction between the two files in $SUBJECT? I see that -client
is the same as nm-manager.xml minus the legacy methods, but what is the
background to this? Is nm-manager.xml deprecated? Should both files always
be installed?
cheers
Will
19 matches
Mail list logo
