Re: [PATCH] [resend] [3/3] Use libnl instead of iproute/AF_PACKET (nm_system_device_set_ip4_route)

On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 21:04 +0200, Benoit Boissinot wrote: > (resend) > > Removes the AF_INET implementation of nm_system_device_set_ip4_route, > reimplement it with libnl. > The fifth argument is now the prefixlen, and no longer the netmask (it > was always called with 255.255.255.255) Committed

Re: [PATCH] [resend] [2/3] Use libnl instead of iproute/AF_PACKET (nm_system_device_replace_default_ipv4_route)

On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 21:01 +0200, Benoit Boissinot wrote: > (resend) > (depends on the cleanup of the frugalware backend) > > Remove nm_system_device_replace_default_ip4_route from all > backends, implement it with libnl. Committed, thanks! One note though; we need to accept 0 as a gateway when

Re: [PATCH] [1/3] Use libnl instead of iproute/AF_PACKET (nm_system_device_add_route_via_device_with_iface)

On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 20:10 -0400, Benoit Boissinot wrote: > (depends on the cleanup of the frugalware backend) > > Remove nm_system_device_add_ip4_route_via_device_with_iface from all > backends, implement it with libnl. > Removes validate_ip4_route since we don't call system anymore Committed,

Re: Fedora 9 NetworkManager

On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 17:42 +0200, drago01 wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Second, you'll want to put: > > > > > > DNS1=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > > > DNS2=xxx

Re: Fedora 9 NetworkManager

On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 17:42 +0200, drago01 wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Second, you'll want to put: > > > > DNS1=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > > DNS2=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > > > > into your /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 > For me this seems

Re: Fedora 9 NetworkManager

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Second, you'll want to put: > > DNS1=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > DNS2=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > > into your /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 For me this seems not to work like it should NM only picked up the "DNS1" entry but ig

Re: Is Ignore interfaces supported?

On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 14:03 +0200, Benoit Boissinot wrote: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Simon Geard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 09:22 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > > On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 11:45 +, Nick Byrne wrote: > > > > Hi list, > > > > > > > > I would l

Re: NetworkManager should report killswitch state per device

On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 07:45 +0200, Helmut Schaa wrote: > Am Do 24 Apr 2008 19:24:33 CEST schrieb Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 12:17 +0200, Helmut Schaa wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> NetworkManager reports the current killswitch state as a global flag > >> (WirelessHard

Re: Is Ignore interfaces supported?

On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Simon Geard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 09:22 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 11:45 +, Nick Byrne wrote: > > > Hi list, > > > > > > I would like configure NM so that ignores my ethernet > > > interfaces, is this

Re: Is Ignore interfaces supported?

On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 09:22 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote: > On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 11:45 +, Nick Byrne wrote: > > Hi list, > > > > I would like configure NM so that ignores my ethernet > > interfaces, is this possible? > > > > Thanks > > Nick > Why would you want to do that? I've encountered a

Re: Is Ignore interfaces supported?

Thats fantastic thanks everyone. ps i meant to say version 0.7 and i have now updated to svn3370 which works even better thanks to the developers for a great tool. ___ NetworkManager-list mailing list NetworkManager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/