On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Kristian Slavov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can do all sorts of magic, but that wasn't the point. You don't always
> have an access to DHCP and/or DNS servers to configure all sorts of things
> (or your request is denied).
Sure but there is no point in impleme
Dan Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 12:15 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Kristian Slavov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unfortunately the office network has also a DHCP server.
Wouldn't it make more sense to properly configure the DHCP server then? ;)
Yeah,
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 12:05 +0200, Christoph Höger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if you take nm-openvpn revision 3632 you'll see that if you (in the
> advanced -> TLS tab) choose TLS cipher or TLS auth and later deactivate
> those boxes, that the changes where not accepted. I'm not sure if this
> is still in t
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 12:15 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Kristian Slavov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Unfortunately the office network has also a DHCP server.
>
> Wouldn't it make more sense to properly configure the DHCP server then? ;)
Yeah, seriously, hav
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 00:04 +0200, Christoph Höger wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> is anyone currently actively developing nm-openvpn or is it just getting
> pulled to latest nm api changes?
I'm mostly occupied with making the 0.7 plugin rock.
> I'm asking because I figured some weirdness in the TLS-Tab
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Kristian Slavov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately the office network has also a DHCP server.
Wouldn't it make more sense to properly configure the DHCP server then? ;)
--
Patryk Zawadzki
___
NetworkManager-lis
Hi,
if you take nm-openvpn revision 3632 you'll see that if you (in the
advanced -> TLS tab) choose TLS cipher or TLS auth and later deactivate
those boxes, that the changes where not accepted. I'm not sure if this
is still in the latest development files, but if so here is the patch:
You simply n
Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 12:01 +0300, Kristian Slavov wrote:
Hi,
Is NM capable of handling the following scenario?
A laptop, when located at office, has a static address. Once outside,
DHCP is used to get an address.
NM 0.7 is, but since you're mixing the two there will be s
