Hello everybody,
this is my first post to this list, and it combines submitting a patch
for a new feature, and a request for help.
The attached patch is against NetworkManager-openvpn-0.7.0-16.svn4027
(Fedora 9) and adds support for the --auth option of openvpn. The
configuration import feature
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 14:59 -0800, the_leech wrote:
>
> Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> >
> > You can add custom routes in the IPv4 tab of the connection editor for
> > the VPN connection. You can also check "ignore automatically provided
> > routes" if you don't care what the server sends you.
> >
Hi,
I tagged and uploaded NM 0.7.0-rc1 on Sunday night. Yes, there are
still bugs, and yes, we'll fix the bad ones, and yes, some people's pet
bugs will only get fixed after the final release. I'll do an rc2 this
coming weekend, and we'll wrap up the 0.7 development cycle by November
15th. This
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 15:18 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 14:25 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 20:15 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > > > >
Dan Williams wrote:
>
>
> You can add custom routes in the IPv4 tab of the connection editor for
> the VPN connection. You can also check "ignore automatically provided
> routes" if you don't care what the server sends you.
>
>
Dan,
Would you please elaborate on how to do that?
I just need
Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 14:25 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 20:15 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:48:40PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 14:25 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 20:15 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:48:40PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 00:58 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] w
Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:48:40PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 00:58 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Hello, I am a new user to Linux and tried to find the proper resources
> > > before seeking help.
> > >
> > > I am
I think this will fix my issue... only append the newline if we're not parsing
the last line of the file.
--- src/NetworkManagerPolicy.c.orig 2008-11-03 09:33:08.0 -0500
+++ src/NetworkManagerPolicy.c 2008-11-04 17:02:39.0 -0500
@@ -306,7 +306,8 @@
if (add_l
Hi -
Each time I unplug, or reconnect my network cable, a blank line gets added to
the end of /etc/hosts.
# wc -l /etc/hosts
4 /etc/hosts
(unplug my cable...)
# wc -l /etc/hosts
5 /etc/hosts
(plug cable back in...)
# wc -l /etc/hosts
6 /etc/hosts
Guessing that it is the g_string_append_c() call
Hi Dan,
So the first thing that draw me off is that we are stupidly mapping
the HAL
devices 1:1 to our devices. That is wrong. We should not do this.
So for
example my Option card has three TTYs and one network device. This
all is
one device. Currently it shows up as three devices. The number of
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 20:15 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:48:40PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 00:58 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Hello, I am a new user to Linux and tried to find the proper
> resources before seeking help.
> > >
> > > I
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 13:52 -0500, Miner, Jonathan W (US SSA) wrote:
> I understand the need for multiple lease files, based on network.
>
> My concern was the two different directories being used. I was trying to
> solve a network problem, and couldn't understand why my lease files were
> seve
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:48:40PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 00:58 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hello, I am a new user to Linux and tried to find the proper resources
> > before seeking help.
> >
> > I am using NM 0.7.0-lp.0025.o.4
> > I am using a Sierra Wireless
I just submitted a patch for this card up stream? What distro are you
running? You try Ubuntu Intrepid ?
You will need hal entries for it to find it in your distro. I use the
ATT Sierra Wireless now.
Only thing with Ubuntu Intrepid (as temporary work around till network
manager gets updated), yo
I understand the need for multiple lease files, based on network.
My concern was the two different directories being used. I was trying to solve
a network problem, and couldn't understand why my lease files were several
months old... Then I discovered that NM was putting lease files somewhere e
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 17:24 +0100, Marco Franke wrote:
> Good evening,
>
> I went with a notebook in the range of my AccessPoint and the NetworkManager
> need 40s to create with it. Is it normal?
Not usually, no, but it depends greatly on how strong the AP's signal
is.
> How can I get inform
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 18:42 -0600, fREW Schmidt wrote:
> Ok, so I got networkmanager up and running and I can't see any
> networks listed in the add new connection screen.
>
> I am using knetworkmanager as an interface, but I presume that it's a
> lower level issue, so I'll post the output to nm-t
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 00:58 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello, I am a new user to Linux and tried to find the proper resources before
> seeking help.
>
> I am using NM 0.7.0-lp.0025.o.4
> I am using a Sierra Wireless 881 WCDMA modem with ATT
>
> As far as I can tell, I successfully install
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 15:54 +0100, Pablo Martí wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 03:11:13PM +0100, Pablo Martí wrote:
> >> Sure! I also think that the Firefox approach is not the right one, is
> >> just that I'm not very f
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 11:47 -0500, Miner, Jonathan W (US SSA) wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I've noticed that the native Fedora "ifup-eth" script puts its lease files
> into
>
> /var/lib/dhclient/dhclient-${DEVICE}.leases
>
> but, NetworkManager puts the lease files into
>
> /var/run/dhclient-${DEVICE}.le
Hello, I am a new user to Linux and tried to find the proper resources before
seeking help.
I am using NM 0.7.0-lp.0025.o.4
I am using a Sierra Wireless 881 WCDMA modem with ATT
As far as I can tell, I successfully installed the modem driver and it is
listed as /dev/ttyUSB0
Unfortunately, when
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 10:04 +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Tambet,
>
> >> So the first thing that draw me off is that we are stupidly mapping
> >> the HAL
> >> devices 1:1 to our devices. That is wrong. We should not do this.
> >> So for
> >> example my Option card has three TTYs and one n
Hi -
I've noticed that the native Fedora "ifup-eth" script puts its lease files into
/var/lib/dhclient/dhclient-${DEVICE}.leases
but, NetworkManager puts the lease files into
/var/run/dhclient-${DEVICE}.lease
It looks like this is coming from nm-dhcp-manager.h, which builds
NM_DHCP_MANAGER_RU
Good evening,
I went with a notebook in the range of my AccessPoint and the NetworkManager
need 40s to create with it. Is it normal?
How can I get informations about the problem? How can I start the NM with
debug informations?
Thanks
--
Mfg der bijektive Homomorphismus ist ein Isomorphis
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Tambet Ingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Pablo Martí <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> OK thanks for the links. I really think this can be done outside of NM
>>>
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Pablo Martí <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> OK thanks for the links. I really think this can be done outside of NM
>> applet to things started.
>>
>> Writing a wispr-applet that listens to D-Bu
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 03:11:13PM +0100, Pablo Martí wrote:
>> Sure! I also think that the Firefox approach is not the right one, is
>> just that I'm not very fond on NM's dispatcher
>> architecture/capabilities. I kinda l
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Patryk Zawadzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Pablo Martí <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> No, the very first time you interact with the hotspot, you'll be
>> redirected to the login page anyway. You'll have to accept the ToS and
>> *pay*.
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 03:11:13PM +0100, Pablo Martí wrote:
> Sure! I also think that the Firefox approach is not the right one, is
> just that I'm not very fond on NM's dispatcher
> architecture/capabilities. I kinda like the description/mockup given
> here [0]. Marcelo asked in nm-list 1 year ag
El mar, 04-11-2008 a las 15:02 +0100, Patryk Zawadzki escribió:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:13:37PM +0100, Pablo Martí wrote:
> >> The benefit is that the user is not redirected to the hotspot webpage,
> >> but is logged
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:13:37PM +0100, Pablo Martí wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:29:22PM +0200, Tambet Ingo wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Nov 4
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Pablo Martí <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, the very first time you interact with the hotspot, you'll be
> redirected to the login page anyway. You'll have to accept the ToS and
> *pay*. The use-case discussed here is after paying for the access, not
> having to exp
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 03:02:04PM +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:13:37PM +0100, Pablo Martí wrote:
> >> The benefit is that the user is not redirected to the hotspot webpage,
> >> but is logge
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Patryk Zawadzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:13:37PM +0100, Pablo Martí wrote:
>>> The benefit is that the user is not redirected to the hotspot webpage,
>>> but i
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:13:37PM +0100, Pablo Martí wrote:
>> The benefit is that the user is not redirected to the hotspot webpage,
>> but is logged in automatically. It might seem a silly difference, but
>> is a request
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:13:37PM +0100, Pablo Martí wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:29:22PM +0200, Tambet Ingo wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Nov
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Pablo Martí <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:29:22PM +0200, Tambet Ingo wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > On T
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:29:22PM +0200, Tambet Ingo wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:44:59AM +0200, Tambet Ingo wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Add a d
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:29:22PM +0200, Tambet Ingo wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:44:59AM +0200, Tambet Ingo wrote:
> >>
> >> Add a dispatcher script that runs "xdg-open $url" for a specific SSID
> >> you need it
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:44:59AM +0200, Tambet Ingo wrote:
>>
>> Add a dispatcher script that runs "xdg-open $url" for a specific SSID
>> you need it for and you're done.
>
> Do we have per-user dispatcher scripts or are
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:44:59AM +0200, Tambet Ingo wrote:
>
> Add a dispatcher script that runs "xdg-open $url" for a specific SSID
> you need it for and you're done.
Do we have per-user dispatcher scripts or are you suggesting to open
the browser as root here :) ?
- Alexander
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Tomas Kovacik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and this is HAL .fdi problem?:
>
> dmesg:
> [82410.648181] usb 2-2: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address
> 2
> [82410.821948] usb 2-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
> [82411.050542] cdc_acm 2-2:1.1:
Hi Tambet,
So the first thing that draw me off is that we are stupidly mapping
the HAL
devices 1:1 to our devices. That is wrong. We should not do this.
So for
example my Option card has three TTYs and one network device. This
all is
one device. Currently it shows up as three devices. The
Tambet Ingo wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:54 AM, Marcel Holtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So the first thing that draw me off is that we are stupidly mapping the HAL
>> devices 1:1 to our devices. That is wrong. We should not do this. So for
>> example my Option card has three TTYs an
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:41 AM, Slokunshialgo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know I posted something about this awhile ago, but thinking about it a
> bit more, a couple of questions and ideas have arisen in my mind. For
> those who may not have read this before, the idea is to have something
> usi
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:54 AM, Marcel Holtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So the first thing that draw me off is that we are stupidly mapping the HAL
> devices 1:1 to our devices. That is wrong. We should not do this. So for
> example my Option card has three TTYs and one network device. This al
47 matches
Mail list logo
