Hi Dan,
On Friday 27 February 2009 23:36:49 Dan Williams wrote:
> Ok, so it apparently sometimes needs an autoreconf then, and no
> patching? Just trying to make sure what needs (or doesn't) need to be
> done here. Is one of the patches in this thread required?
if you're patching .am file, you
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 01:56 +0300, Victor Ashirov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Mikhail Efremov wrote:
> > Hello!
> > On Friday 27 February 2009 17:14:34 you wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Mikhail Efremov wrote:
> >> > On Friday 27 February 2009 15:03:49 Victor
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 17:59 -0700, Drew Moseley wrote:
> Dan Williams wrote:
> > Is HAL being restarted anywhere in here while NM continues to run?
>
>
> Yes it is. That is where I am looking now. In the resync_devices()
> routine it seems like the nm_device_finalize is being triggered before
>
Hello!
I have some ideas for NetworkManager:
1. Add visual configurator for iptables.
2. Make gnome-ppp as part of NetworkManager.
3. Possibility of enabling toonel.net proxy server.
Dmitry Unruh.
Linux beginner. Programming beginner. English beginner. :)
___
Hi!
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Mikhail Efremov wrote:
> Hello!
> On Friday 27 February 2009 17:14:34 you wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Mikhail Efremov wrote:
>> > On Friday 27 February 2009 15:03:49 Victor Ashirov wrote:
>> >> > Does the following patch work better?
>> >>
>> >
Hi Mikhail,
On Friday 27 February 2009 12:32:24 Mikhail Efremov wrote:
> On Friday 27 February 2009 15:03:49 Victor Ashirov wrote:
> > > Does the following patch work better?
> >
> > No. It gives the same error.
>
> Try attached patch.
Yes, this patch fixes it.
Thanks,
Rob
signature.asc
Descr
Hello!
On Friday 27 February 2009 17:14:34 you wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Mikhail Efremov wrote:
> > On Friday 27 February 2009 15:03:49 Victor Ashirov wrote:
> >> > Does the following patch work better?
> >>
> >> No. It gives the same error.
> >
> > Try attached patch.
>
> NM from
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Mikhail Efremov wrote:
> On Friday 27 February 2009 15:03:49 Victor Ashirov wrote:
>>
>> > Does the following patch work better?
>>
>> No. It gives the same error.
>
> Try attached patch.
NM from git compiles fine except for tests. NM-0.7.1rc1 and rc2 still fail.
On Friday 27 February 2009 15:03:49 Victor Ashirov wrote:
>
> > Does the following patch work better?
>
> No. It gives the same error.
Try attached patch.
--
WBR, Mikhail Efremov
diff --git a/system-settings/plugins/keyfile/tests/Makefile.am b/system-settings/plugins/keyfile/tests/Makefile.am
in
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:14 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> Odd; what gcc version?
Oops, forgot to mention.
gcc (Gentoo 4.3.3 p1.0, pie-10.1.5) 4.3.3
gcc (GCC) 4.2.4 (Gentoo 4.2.4-r1 p1.1)
Both fail with the same error.
> Does the following patch work better?
No. It gives the same error.
x86_64-pc
I now actually have a Netscreen VPN box so I actually can test this out
too.
Sorry to insist on this Dan but any progress with NetScreen/Juniper
support in the vpnc plugin?
The vpnc plugin for NM does not support the vpnc "--vendor" option at
the moment and thus does not allow connecting
11 matches
Mail list logo
