If you look at /proc/net/dev once connected there's counters available
showing how much data that has been transferred, I believe this
counter will reset each time the interface is disconnected from your
computer.
Your best choice is probably to write a script that counts the data
from /proc/net/d
This would be a great feature, can i also request that you also
consider pay as you go subscriptions, which have a capped limit of
both data and time, so it would be great to have a counter start tool
that could be used to count time and usage. So users could access how
much usage they have
Hi,
I recently started using the mobile broadband feature of NM, and it
works great. Unfortunately, I have a monthly upper threshold on my
subscription, which I guess is pretty common. If I exceed this limit, I
will get charged excessively per MB transferred. In my case the
threshold is 500 MB per
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:09:09 +0300
Pekka Pekka wrote:
> NetworkManager Applet 0.7.0.100
>
> and my SPM log...
>
> Commit Log for Wed Apr 29 18:15:53 2009
>
> Upgraded the following packages:
> akiradnews (20081019) to 20090428
> firefox (3.0.9+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1) to 3.0.10+nobinonly-0ub
NetworkManager Applet 0.7.0.100
and my SPM log...
Commit Log for Wed Apr 29 18:15:53 2009
Upgraded the following packages:
akiradnews (20081019) to 20090428
firefox (3.0.9+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1) to 3.0.10+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1
firefox-3.0 (3.0.9+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1) to
3.0.10+nobin
Pekka Pekka wrote:
> I've been using a 3G USB modem with NetworkManager applet for a while now
> with no problems. All of a sudden, it just stopped working.
>
> I tried things like restarting, deleting the modem's profile and creating it
> again, but it's still not working.
> I can connect with my
2009/4/30 Dan Williams
> On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 14:06 +0100, Marc Herbert wrote:
> > David Sundqvist a écrit :
> >
> > > If I set it to be managed by NM, will NM try to manage it in any way?
> > > Can I set it to be seen, but still unmanaged? Or maybe I could get NM
> > > to always output a connec
BTW, I'm running Ubuntu 8.10
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Pekka Pekka wrote:
> I've been using a 3G USB modem with NetworkManager applet for a while now
> with no problems. All of a sudden, it just stopped working.
>
> I tried things like restarting, deleting the modem's profile and creatin
I've been using a 3G USB modem with NetworkManager applet for a while now
with no problems. All of a sudden, it just stopped working.
I tried things like restarting, deleting the modem's profile and creating it
again, but it's still not working.
I can connect with my WLAN dongle though and my 3G m
Quoting Marc Herbert :
For instance this most obvious false positive: you are connected but not
to the internet. Then why would pidgin try to reach MSN servers in this
case?
There's also the granularity issue; one can't expect NM to determine
what ports are blocked by firewalls, proxied, etc
For instance this most obvious false positive: you are connected but not
to the internet. Then why would pidgin try to reach MSN servers in this
case?
post from two days ago.
http://www.nabble.com/-WISH--Make-NM-autodetect-if-it-can-reach-the-internet-td23286488.html
Currently, its seems to be t
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 17:17 +0200, David Sundqvist wrote:
> Quoting Marc Herbert :
> > There seems to be something fundamentally wrong in this no-connection/
> > /offline thing. Since NM can be configured to manage _not all_
> > interfaces (including none at all) then why are some applications
> >
David Sundqvist a écrit :
> Perhaps. Taking a quick look at the NM project webpage, it's not
> really that farfetched: "Using the awesome power and flexibility of
> dbus and hal, NetworkManager provides facilities for other
> applications like browsers, email clients, or system services to b
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 14:06 +0100, Marc Herbert wrote:
> David Sundqvist a écrit :
>
> > If I set it to be managed by NM, will NM try to manage it in any way?
> > Can I set it to be seen, but still unmanaged? Or maybe I could get NM
> > to always output a connected status instead of a no-conne
Quoting Marc Herbert :
There seems to be something fundamentally wrong in this no-connection/
/offline thing. Since NM can be configured to manage _not all_
interfaces (including none at all) then why are some applications
wrongly assuming NM is always managing the entire network
configuration? T
Your virtual machine is only going to see the virtual network that vmware
creates. The host system gets to access the hardware directly, all the guests
only see the virtual network.
-Original Message-
From: networkmanager-list-boun...@gnome.org on behalf of FS Inc.
Sent: Wed 4/29/2
Hey all.
I have two usb wireless devices that I have plugged into my computer. I am on
ubuntu 9.04 so the rt73usb is the kernel module used to drive them. However I
only want to use one of them in my host system. The other one I want to use
exclusively in a VM machine. It is also driven by
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 14:13 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> The attached patch can help with aging of results when moving into to a place
> with no access points (yeah, we can still find some).
Thanks for finding this, though I've committed a different fix that
should work the same, but
2009/4/30 Marc Herbert
> David Sundqvist a écrit :
>
> > If I set it to be managed by NM, will NM try to manage it in any way?
> > Can I set it to be seen, but still unmanaged? Or maybe I could get NM
> > to always output a connected status instead of a no-connection which
> > triggers firefox of
David Sundqvist a écrit :
> If I set it to be managed by NM, will NM try to manage it in any way?
> Can I set it to be seen, but still unmanaged? Or maybe I could get NM
> to always output a connected status instead of a no-connection which
> triggers firefox offline mode, etc. (should the c
Stephen J. Gowdy a écrit :
> When in the office I could previously
> do 50MB/s from my laptop. If I don't manually disable the wireless
> connection I only get 3MB/s. The routing table looks okay;
>
> [r...@antonia ~]# route
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask
On 30/04/09 12:30, Jon Escombe wrote:
Hi,
I've just installed the F11 preview, and seem to have a new issue with
the openvpn plugin.
I get a "the vpn connection xxx failed because there were no valid
secrets" error as soon and a try and make the connection. I am using
certs for authenticati
Hi,
I've just installed the F11 preview, and seem to have a new issue with
the openvpn plugin.
I get a "the vpn connection xxx failed because there were no valid
secrets" error as soon and a try and make the connection. I am using
certs for authentication, but perhaps the plugin is expecting
23 matches
Mail list logo
