Hi,
maybe someone can give me a hint about where to start debugging:
I am using Ubuntu 9.04 on several machines. On some machines Network
Manager works as expected when making connections system wide available
with the connection editor: It puts a file into
/etc/NetworkManager/system-connections.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Marc Herbert wrote:
>
> Rodney Morris a écrit :
>
> >
> > Below is my nm-system-settings.conf:
> >
> > [main]
> > plugins=ifcfg-rh, keyfile
> >
>
> > Thanks in advance for any help in resolving this mystery,
>
> Have you tried to reproduce with just "ifcfg-rh" and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I guess i emailed before reading up in the bugzilla...
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349151
+1 for the "dial this connection first" as well.
Rick Jones wrote:
| --On Thursday, July 23, 2009 15:04:13 -0400 Dan Williams
wrote:
| ¦
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
U guys have got to be kidding! (I mean it in a good way!)
I just signed up to see if this was on track or if i can help with
something.
I have the code (from the anon git source) building nicely and was just
about to start hacking.
Is there any p
--On Thursday, July 23, 2009 15:04:13 -0400 Dan Williams
wrote:
¦
¦ Yeah, reconnect of a failed connection (as opposed to a
¦ user-disconnected one) is definitely on the list. I was planning on
¦ doing some of the work for that in the 'inhibit' branch in git, so you
¦ can track that there. It
Hi Cedric,
> On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 10:16 -0500, Carl Karsten wrote:
> > Sounds like it would be good to just disable the switch,
> right? From
> > what I gather, the switch signals the OS, which then runs
> code to
> > disable the wifi hardware, so
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 10:16 -0500, Carl Karsten wrote:
> > Sounds like it would be good to just disable the switch, right? From
> > what I gather, the switch signals the OS, which then runs code to
> > disable the wifi hardware, so overridin
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 10:16 -0500, Carl Karsten wrote:
> Sounds like it would be good to just disable the switch, right? From
> what I gather, the switch signals the OS, which then runs code to
> disable the wifi hardware, so overriding that is very possible.
Depends on the machine. On some machi
