Hi,
I'm pleased to announce the release of NetworkManager 0.7.3, the latest
version of the super-stable release series. NM 0.7.x releases are
maintenance-only and will no longer receive major features since the
0.8.x release are stable release. But for those of you still running
0.7.x (like OLPC
Am 29.07.2010 um 00:02 schrieb Dan Williams :
> On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:01 +0200, van Schelve Hans-Gerd wrote:
>>
>> Am 28.07.2010 um 11:10 schrieb Dan Williams :
>>
>>> On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 09:53 +0200, van Schelve Hans-Gerd wrote:
Am 23.07.2010 um 01:39 schrieb Dan Williams :
>>
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:01 +0200, van Schelve Hans-Gerd wrote:
>
> Am 28.07.2010 um 11:10 schrieb Dan Williams :
>
> > On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 09:53 +0200, van Schelve Hans-Gerd wrote:
> >>
> >> Am 23.07.2010 um 01:39 schrieb Dan Williams :
> >>
> >>> On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 08:45 +0200, van Schel
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 09:32 -0300, Franco Miceli wrote:
> Dan,
>
> Thanks for your answer. I see what you say. You can request X number
> of scans without being sure that the firmware will execute them.
>
> I understand that to do what I say, that would be mandatory. But in
> order to mitigate th
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 14:54 -0400, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 17:34, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 19:20, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> That is, well, unfortunate... Sierra firmware is usually top-notch so
> >> I'd consider firmware crashes to be less of an issu
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 17:34, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 19:20, Dan Williams wrote:
>> That is, well, unfortunate... Sierra firmware is usually top-notch so
>> I'd consider firmware crashes to be less of an issue here than with say
>> Huawei or ZTE devices. But they still c
Dan,
Thanks for your answer. I see what you say. You can request X number of
scans without being sure that the firmware will execute them.
I understand that to do what I say, that would be mandatory. But in order to
mitigate the problem of not seeing all AP in range at the start of the
autoconnec
Am 28.07.2010 um 11:10 schrieb Dan Williams :
> On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 09:53 +0200, van Schelve Hans-Gerd wrote:
>>
>> Am 23.07.2010 um 01:39 schrieb Dan Williams :
>>
>>> On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 08:45 +0200, van Schelve wrote:
Hi.
We found a reproducable bug with NetworkManager.
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 09:30 -0300, Franco Miceli wrote:
> So far, trying to get this problem solved, I have made a initscript
> that runs before NM. This script enables the wireless interface and
> performs a couple of scans (iwlist).
>
> Doing this (which performs as asked, finding almost all the
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 20:36 +0200, Klaus Lichtenwalder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just wondering, when I plug my 3g USB modem, NetworkManager
> (ModemManager?) asks for the pin to unlock the sim card. No problem with
> that, except that it shows the pin entered. Shouldn't that be more like
> a password
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 16:01 +0800, bensonwu wrote:
> Dear Dan:
>
> My modem (option GIO225) can works in fedora 13 and fedora 11. But it
> can't work in MeeGo (2.6.33.3-10 kernel version).
> I try the all serial ports, but not any response in minicom. In fedora
> 13 or 11, it's ok.
>
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 14:54 -0400, .. ink .. wrote:
> i have looked for an official area to report bugs but couldnt find any
> and hence i decided to report it here. Can somebody point me to a bug
> tracker for this project? I use kde and i am aware of bugs.kde.org but
> not gnome's equivalent.
>
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 05:54 +0200, Mirko Gasparovic wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> since Ubuntu Karmic, I'm not able to establish a connection to the 3G
> Network with the network manager. With Jaunty worked all out of the box.
> I have a Asus eeePC 1000HG wi
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 02:32 +, Gary Trakhman wrote:
> yup:
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul 11 19:40 driver ->
> ../../../../bus/pci/drivers/ath5k
>
> and
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul 11 19:40 driver ->
> ../../../../bus/pci/drivers/r8169
NM gets the driver from udev attributes; you c
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 17:05 -0400, Pat Suwalski wrote:
> On 09/07/10 04:21 PM, Pat Suwalski wrote:
> > I just upgraded my system from 0.7.2 proper to 0.7.2.997. In the
> > process, I seem to have lost the ability to scan for access points.
> > nm-tool returns a blank list, but otherwise the output
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 21:04 -0400, Daniel Gnoutcheff wrote:
> For exported connections, nm_settings_connection_interface_update() is
> supposed to cause the emission of a
> NM_SETTINGS_CONNECTION_INTERFACE_UPDATED signal. This is usually done
> by chaining up to the NMExportedConnection implementa
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 14:04 -0600, Matt Warnock wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I'm running NM 0.8 on a Dell Studio 1555 Laptop with Ubuntu 10.04, using
> the Broadcom STA wireless driver. I regularly run between home and the
> office. I usually don't hibernate, I just suspend by closing the lid and
> go, a
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 09:50 +0530, Mohammed Arafat Kamaal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm building NM for a embedded linux platform. Since udhcpc is
> available on it, I would like to make use of it instead of dhclient or
> dhcpcd. Also udhcpc is comparatively lighter when compared to
> dhclient/dhcpcd. The
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 15:58 -0600, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> I finally got round to investigating this issue:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network.networkmanager.devel/13607
>
> To summarize, notifications of the "scanning" property of NMDeviceWifi
> are not always generated when
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 21:50 -0700, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> ---
> serviceproviders.2.dtd |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Pushed, thanks!
> diff --git a/serviceproviders.2.dtd b/serviceproviders.2.dtd
> index 485b0aa..4c96220 100644
> --- a/serviceproviders.2.dtd
> +
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 09:53 +0200, van Schelve Hans-Gerd wrote:
>
> Am 23.07.2010 um 01:39 schrieb Dan Williams :
>
> > On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 08:45 +0200, van Schelve wrote:
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> We found a reproducable bug with NetworkManager. In the end you have a
> >> connection but resolv.conf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I wanted to inquire what is the current status about command line
interfaces for networkmanager supporting VPN.
As far as I can see there were 2 attempts:
- - nmcli from Tambet
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/networkmanager-list/2008-February/msg
i have looked for an official area to report bugs but couldnt find any and
hence i decided to report it here. Can somebody point me to a bug tracker
for this project? I use kde and i am aware of bugs.kde.org but not gnome's
equivalent.
There seem to be a bug somewhere on how NM accepts and handles
23 matches
Mail list logo
