On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 17:00 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 16:31 +0200, Thomas Woerner wrote:
> > Hello Ludwig,
> >
> > On 07/27/2011 01:45 PM, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> > > Jiri Popelka wrote:
> > >> On 06/30/2011 11:11 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > >>> On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 19:03
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 12:38 -0700, Evan Broder wrote:
> Includes subject_match and phase2_subject_match (string) parameters,
> and altsubject_matches and phase2_altsubject_matches (list of string)
> parameters.
>
> subject_match is matched against a substring of the subject from the
> certificate
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 18:12 -0400, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We don't really need to wait before both IPv4 and IPv6 are established before
> applying all the settings to the device. Instead, we can apply each separately
> when they are ready, which will bring up the interface sooner
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 12:17 +0200, wp1191918-hgvs wrote:
>
>
> Marius Kotsbak hat am 26. Juli 2011 um 02:17
> geschrieben:
>
>
> > Den 25. juli 2011 12:08, skrev wp1191918-hgvs:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have found the following problem with an Ericsson F5521gw 3G modem:
> > >
> > > 1. sta
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 23:27 +0200, Marius Kotsbak wrote:
> On 27. juli 2011 21:53, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 11:32 +0200, Marius Kotsbak wrote:
> >> Den 19. juli 2011 17:51, skrev Dan Williams:
> >>> As long as the attributes we add aren't required, it should be fine to
> >>> ad
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 22:10 -0400, Eric Shienbrood wrote:
> Another way to do it:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> That way, the plan types and the usage types can still be declared as
> enumerations.
That actually looks pretty good. Oleg, does that look OK to you? If
so, lets rev the pat
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 11:39 -0400, Daniel Gnoutcheff wrote:
> On 07/30/2011 08:11 AM, Marius Kotsbak wrote:
> > On 28. juli 2011 07:08, Eugene Arshinov wrote:
> >> Hi again
> >>
> >> Here is the second question. Sometimes it happens that NetworkManager
> >> connects to a mobile network (for which
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 09:02 +0100, Andrew Bird wrote:
> The current UI requires the user to mouse-over and reveal a tool
> tip (or click an indicator) to discover the registration state
> (aka polling). If the user inadvertently re-registers on a
> roaming network, the operation is silent until the
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 18:18 -0400, Eric Shienbrood wrote:
> I can look at doing that. What should we call it? I think MSISDN is a
> GSM term. How does GetPhoneNumber() sound?
Hm, old message. Yes, that method sounds fine.
Dan
>
> Eric
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Dan Williams w
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 00:12 +0200, Marius Kotsbak wrote:
> On 27. juli 2011 22:12, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 14:58 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 15:45 +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> >>> Hi Oleg,
> >>>
> > The only tricky part is that in some cases so
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 18:24 -0400, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> On 07/29/2011 05:54 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 10:23 -0400, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> As I'm not subscribed to this mailing-list, I'd appreciate it if
> >> you could Cc me on your replies. Thanks
On 07/30/2011 08:11 AM, Marius Kotsbak wrote:
> On 28. juli 2011 07:08, Eugene Arshinov wrote:
>> Hi again
>>
>> Here is the second question. Sometimes it happens that NetworkManager
>> connects to a mobile network (for which "Connect automatically" is set)
>> even if "Mobile network" item in tray
On 28. juli 2011 07:08, Eugene Arshinov wrote:
> Hi again
>
> Here is the second question. Sometimes it happens that NetworkManager
> connects to a mobile network (for which "Connect automatically" is set)
> even if "Mobile network" item in tray icon's context menu is
> unchecked. Shouldn't that
13 matches
Mail list logo
