>
> Yeah, I thought the issue was that it doesn't like text mode, while
> gammu uses PDU mode, and we were going to fix MM to fall back to PDU
> mode if it was supported and text mode failed. But that fix isn't quite
> in yet.
>
> Dan
Hi,
I hope you find my reports useful :)
I check the git re
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 21:15 +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> +if (response->data[i] == '\r' && response->data[i + 1] ==
> '\n') {
> +if (i > 0)
> +g_byte_array_remove_range (response, 0, i);
> +else
> +/* good, we're already started
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 14:05 +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
> Removes all bonding options properties and adds a "options" dict to hold
> them all. Accessible via accessor functions. ifcfg interface is
> unchanged.
Applied with a few changes; instead of _by_key() use _by_name() since
that's more appropri
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 12:36 +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
> Adds two simple test cases for bonding masters and bonding slaves.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf
Applied, thanks.
Dan
> .../tests/network-scripts/ifcfg-test-bond-main |5 +
> .../tests/network-scripts/ifcfg-test-bond-slave|
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 14:33 +0100, PongráczI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried the sms-send.py from the master branch (cloned 5 days ago, no changes
> in the repo), with Huawei E173s-2 modem and I got Operation not allowed error
> message. Receiving info and sms are ok with the python scripts.
>
> I att
>
> Attached a patch for review, which does this echo removal in the v1
> parser. I'm assuming here that all known devices do prefix their replies
> with :-) If that is not the case, I can improve the patch to
> make this behaviour configurable per plugin (even for the probing
> process). At lea
Hi,
I tried the sms-send.py from the master branch (cloned 5 days ago, no changes
in the repo), with Huawei E173s-2 modem and I got Operation not allowed error
message. Receiving info and sms are ok with the python scripts.
I attached the gammu log, which was able to send sms, to analyze and fi
Hello Matej,
On 02/13/2012 11:12 AM, Matej Kovacic wrote:
Hi,
The first patch updates FirewallD DBus service& path& interface.
The second one adds calling of FirewallD1.zone.removeInterface method
during device deactivation.
Firewall Manager package is already available? Or when we can expe
