- Original Message -
From: Dan Irwin rummymob...@gmail.com
To: networkmanager-list@gnome.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 7:42:48 AM
Subject: IPv6 breakage caused by active IPv6 on an inactive interface?
Hello,
I suspect NetworkManager has a small problem regarding IPv6 and
Pavel Simerda psime...@redhat.com writes:
Those are device routes created to mimic the kernel-installed routes
but with a proper metric to prioritize the selected interface. It is a
hack in 0.9.8 (and prior) to get over kernel's crazy autoconfiguration
feature.
Trying to work around kernel
sure. The unknown object type one always annoys me...
On 02/06/2014 05:51 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
Most of these warnings are things libnm-glib can't do anything
about, and they are pretty annoying when running nmcli or nmtui,
and libraries usually shouldn't print random warnings anyway.
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 11:05 +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Pavel Simerda psime...@redhat.com writes:
Those are device routes created to mimic the kernel-installed routes
but with a proper metric to prioritize the selected interface. It is a
hack in 0.9.8 (and prior) to get over kernel's crazy
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 11:17 -0500, Dan Winship wrote:
sure. The unknown object type one always annoys me...
Pushed.
Dan
On 02/06/2014 05:51 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
Most of these warnings are things libnm-glib can't do anything
about, and they are pretty annoying when running nmcli or
Branch review request.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724314
A couple fixes for mobile broadband here, and one cleanup.
Thanks!
Dan
___
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
