On Fri, 2015-11-06 at 23:40 +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Thomas Schäfer <tschae...@t-online.de> writes:
> > lsusb-20151106-suse.txt (good case)
> > lsusb-20151106.txt (manjaro - bad case)
> >
> >
> > both use kernel 4.1.x
> >
> > The diff is not bi
Thomas Schäfer <tschae...@t-online.de> writes:
> lsusb-20151106-suse.txt (good case)
> lsusb-20151106.txt (manjaro - bad case)
>
>
> both use kernel 4.1.x
>
> The diff is not big:
Yes, the device appears identical, switched to the same mode with a
single c
* Dan Williams
> I wouldn't get rid of "Automatic (Addresses only)" since this is what
> enables you to ignore DNS servers/routes and use your own.
Actually, contrary to to what you'd intuitively expect, that method
does *not* ignore receive routes. Only DNS servers are ignored. The
only
On Fri, 2015-11-06 at 17:22 +0100, Thomas Schäfer wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> That was the problem. option has occupied to much resources.
> After removing option and qmi_wwan and adding them in reverse order
> everything works as expected.
> So now I have to find the right people of manjaro.. or they
Am 05.11.2015 um 22:14 schrieb Dan Williams:
On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 19:15 +0100, Thomas Schäfer wrote:
So my question is: Who does decide between qmi-wwan or ppp?
ModemManager does, based on device discovery. So it's likely that the
version of ModemManager that you typed as "mm??" isn't
Thomas Schäfer writes:
> [ 369.482170] option 1-2:1.0: GSM modem (1-port) converter detected
> [ 369.482562] usb 1-2: GSM modem (1-port) converter now attached to ttyUSB0
> [ 369.482639] option 1-2:1.1: GSM modem (1-port) converter detected
> [ 369.483008] usb 1-2: GSM
Hi,
That was the problem. option has occupied to much resources.
After removing option and qmi_wwan and adding them in reverse order
everything works as expected.
So now I have to find the right people of manjaro.. or they read this
thread accidentally.
Thank You very much!!
Thomas
Am
get the 'lsusb
> -v' output for the device so we can figure out how to restrict it. Any
> chance you can provide that?
Yes:
lsusb-20151106-suse.txt (good case)
lsusb-20151106.txt (manjaro - bad case)
both use kernel 4.1.x
The diff is not big:
diff -u lsusb-20151106.txt lsusb-20151106-su