Re: Auto-negotiation - Out of business

2016-11-25 Thread poma
On 25.11.2016 19:23, Francesco Giudici wrote: > The original issue is now solved. > Quick recap of the current status: > > *) [Merged] poma patch v1: > https://git.gnome.org/browse/network-manager-applet/commit/?id=037b61b7 > > *) [Merged] verify that both duplex and speed are set when >

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] nm-connection-editor: UI file for Proxy Tab

2016-11-25 Thread Thomas Haller
On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 05:58 +0530, Atul Anand wrote: Hi, to bring this patchset full-circle, it's now tracked by open bug https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621767 Thomas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___

OpenVPN and avoiding default route

2016-11-25 Thread Anders Blomdell
Would it make sense to let the OpenVPN server disable default-routing in network manager, for instance by checking if a 'push "route-gateway x.y.z.w"' has been done from the server? I mena smething like this, (nm-openvpn-service-openvpn-helper.c): /* Internal VPN subnet gateway */

Re: How to avoid using policy kit with openvpn

2016-11-25 Thread Lubomir Rintel
On Fri, 2016-11-25 at 15:20 +0200, matti kaasinen wrote: > > 2016-11-24 16:03 GMT+02:00 matti kaasinen : > > > To be more exact: service that dos not start anymore after I enable and > > later disable it is avahi-daemon.service. It is told in that unit file that: > >

Re: How to avoid using policy kit with openvpn

2016-11-25 Thread matti kaasinen
2016-11-24 16:03 GMT+02:00 matti kaasinen : > To be more exact: service that dos not start anymore after I enable and > later disable it is avahi-daemon.service. It is told in that unit file that: > Alias=dbus-org.freedesktop.Avahi.service. > In fact, it seems that any

Re: Auto-negotiation - Out of business

2016-11-25 Thread Francesco Giudici
What about: https://git.gnome.org/browse/network-manager-applet/log/?h=fg/c-e-ethernet-link ? On 24/11/2016 19:59, Francesco Giudici wrote: > > > On 24/11/2016 13:22, Thomas Haller wrote: >> ... >> sounds good. >> >> A warning however is not helpful, because it will emit a warning for >> every