Fwd: Multi Active Devices

2008-12-20 Thread Etienne Zind
gers dirty in your elegantr GObj C code, although I might need some "emlightment" from you guys to be sure it worth it. Please have a look at my shell script (working). Any comment will be welcome. [1] http://lartc.org/howto/index.html [2] http://parad0x.org/~barbu/de

Multi Active Devices

2008-12-20 Thread Etienne Zind
gers dirty in your elegantr GObj C code, although I might need some "emlightment" from you guys to be sure it worth it. Please have a look at my shell script (working). Any comment will be welcome. [1] http://lartc.org/howto/index.html [2] http://parad0x.org/~barbu/dev/mad/mad-setup

Re: three privacy questions

2008-12-19 Thread Etienne Zind
2008/12/20 Chuck Anderson : > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 09:21:50AM +0800, Etienne Zind wrote: >> >> As iproute is already heavily used in NM, the blocking might be done >> >> with `ip rule` or `ip route` ath can do `reject`,`unreachable` and >> >> `prohibits`

Re: three privacy questions

2008-12-19 Thread Etienne Zind
fic remove all our default route(s) and replace them with some "unreachable" or "reject" route according to what kind of error we want to generate on outgoing trafic. Then we add a route to the VPN server, or all the IPs needed to setup the VPN: $ route add $VPN_IP1 dev $VPN_DEV

Re: three privacy questions

2008-12-19 Thread Etienne Zind
lation. $ ip rule from all unreachable or $ ip route add unreachable default Should do the trick -- Regards, Etienne Zind The motive for DRM schemes is to increase profits for those who impose them, but their profit is a side issue when millions of people's fr