Re: [PATCH](or feature-request) build both systemd and ck versions

2012-10-18 Thread Luke T . Shumaker
At Thu, 18 Oct 2012 05:19:57 -0400 (EDT), Pavel Simerda wrote: > In my opinion, you should have just one binary. It is easy to detect systemd > at runtime, as it requires cgroups and creates one. Symlink management is > an overkill here. CK should be likewise very easy to detect. In absence of > bo

Re: [PATCH](or feature-request) build both systemd and ck versions

2012-10-17 Thread Luke T . Shumaker
At Wed, 17 Oct 2012 15:02:09 -0400, Luke T. Shumaker wrote: > The attached patch ... And I forgot to attache the patch, sorry! all-sessions.patch Description: Binary data ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org ht

[PATCH](or feature-request) build both systemd and ck versions

2012-10-17 Thread Luke T . Shumaker
I propose that the build system should generage both `NetworkManager-ck' and `NetworkManager-systemd' binaries and symlink `NetworkManager' to one of them. This way a distro that supports both sysvinit and systemd (such as Arch) can easily offer both. In the case of Arch, the correct version can