Hi Dan,
Sorry for replying late and thanks for taking care of this.
Dan Williams d...@redhat.com writes:
So I'll propose a different solution: check the last patch in the
dcbw/dns-iface git branch, and let me know if that works for you?
Hi Dan,
Dan Williams d...@redhat.com writes:
cat /var/run/NetworkManager/dnsmasq.conf
server=192.168.1.1
server=fe80::4e60:deff:fed8:d7c5@eth0
server=192.168.1.1
server=fe80::4e60:deff:fed8:d7c5@wlan0
I suppose it doesn’t really hurt, at least not in my case, but wouldn’t
it be cleaner
up in
the situation where priv-last_iface is NULL when adding a link-local
IPv6 DNS server (e.g. fe80::4e60:deff:fed8:d7c5%wlan0), leading to a
segmentation fault.
--
Best regards,
Michael
From 48d5f34f709dbf00ea0bffeabb4e5db136500a32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Stapelberg mich
Hi Dan,
Dan Williams d...@redhat.com writes:
Sending the interface name is a hack anyway just to make netconfig and
resolvconf happy, even though prioritizing DNS information based on
interface name is bogus. NM merges and prioritizes the DNS
configuration before sending to
Hi Howard,
Quoting Howard Chu (2012-05-06 17:09:11)
Killing and restarting dnsmasq each time you need to make a change has all
the
elegance of a kick in the groin. Problems like this wouldn't exist if you
used
I totally agree, but it’s necessary at the moment to make my system work.
:00:00 2001
From: Michael Stapelberg mich...@stapelberg.de
Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 14:56:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Use SIGKILL to be able to immediately start a new dnsmasq
afterwards
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
This fixes the problem
Hi Dan,
Excerpts from Dan Williams's message of 2011-08-25 22:54:53 +0200:
Pushed to 0.9 and 0.8 with a small fix to avoid the extra allocation
when the interface is not returned. If you can re-verify my
g_strdup_printf - strncat conversion that'd be great.
Yep, it works correctly. Thanks!
Hi Dan,
Excerpts from Dan Williams's message of 2011-08-20 00:47:59 +0200:
Thanks! Though we do risk buffer overflows because the buffer being
passed into the function is only INET6_ADDRSTRLEN long, so we need to be
more careful here when appending the interface name. I've reworked that
a
99cd08234bffdaebbafb5e4deff302809fa819ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Stapelberg mich...@stapelberg.de
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 13:43:07 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Use '@interface' for link-local DNS servers in the dnsmasq
config
---
src/dns-manager/nm-dns-bind.c|3 ++-
src/dns
