FWIW,
I, Koukousoulas Pantelis, agree to relicense my contributions to
NetworkManager as LGPL-2.1+ as proposed by Thomas Haller. (I don't know if
there is any code from me
left in NetworkManager, since I haven't touched the project for many years,
but in case there is, I happily agree to relicense
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 3:32 AM, brom...@lavabit.com wrote:
Hello!
I'd like to try cnetworkmanager. The only thing that stops me is the
following options:
--wep-hex=KEY use this WEP key of 26 hex digits
--wep-pass=KEYuse this WEP passphrase
--wpa-psk-hex=KEY use
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Sanjay Pallikera san...@ridgerun.com wrote:
Hi Pantelis,
I hope 'nmcli' uses Dbus, because I want NM (without UI) with DBus strictly
for my project.
Please don't send personal emails, send to the list instead.
All 3 solutions that Thomas mentioned use DBus
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Sanjay Pallikera san...@ridgerun.com wrote:
Sorry Pantelis,
Actually I can not see the 'Reply' button in the following link,
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/networkmanager-list/2012-September/msg00115.html
So I shoot email to your email ids,
Could you
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Sanjay Pallikera san...@ridgerun.com wrote:
So I need not include pkt...@gmail.com also? just I will reply to
networkmanager-list@gnome.org is that ok?
Yep
___
networkmanager-list mailing list
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Sanjay Pallikera san...@ridgerun.com wrote:
Hello,
Actually I want to integrate NM with embedded systems without UI, so I want
only a command line tool or a daemon.
Kindly pls provide some info on this.
Thanks in advance
Sanjay
NM is actually just a
Hi,
Sorry for taking so long to test the latest adsl branch, I was in a
situation where I couldn't
compile NetworkManager's git. Now that I have a system with latest
ubuntu (12.04 alpha)
here are my rough results:
1) I needed to add --enable-more-warnings=no in order to get
NetworkManager git to
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Thomas Bechtold
thomasbecht...@jpberlin.de wrote:
That's not working in my case because both conenctions should grap the
default route, but the modem connection should have a higher priority.
My humble opinion is that it should be like this by default, i.e.,
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 21:38 +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote:
This is a first cut at experimental PPPoE support for ADSL devices.
There are several shortcuts and the code is ugly, but it works so
it can be used as a strawman
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Alex Pyattaev alex.pyatt...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry to bring it up again,
but I had to go through the whole code of NM to find the root of this problem,
and it seems that it has nothing to do with NM itself, but rather with
interaction between NM and
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Goldstein goldstein...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm new to the list. Sorry if this kind of message is not appropriate.
The thing is that I find it a bit annoying that nm applet does not show the
nm-secure-lock icon on top of the nm-signal-XX icon when I'm
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Timo Babst timo.ba...@epfl.ch wrote:
Hello, I am using NetworkManager Applet 0.8. It works great except for one
very annoying thing : there is a checkbox that says show password and
someone (luckily a friend) was able to copy my password just by using this
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Tim Evans tkev...@tkevans.com wrote:
Just upgraded my Lenovo ThinkPad T61 from Fedora 14 to Fedora 15 (via
preupgrade) and lost my Intel AGN wireless in the process. Wireless was
working well with F-14.
Actually, NetworkManager itself barfs (see debug output
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:59 PM, raghunathan.kailasanat...@wipro.com wrote:
Hi list,
I am cross-compiling nm for an embedded target. I don't require
any GNOME/GTK/GUI/applet functionality. Do I still require dbus-glib ? If not,
how can I remove that from the config ?
D-BUS is not a GUI
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 3:22 AM, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org wrote:
Hm, new code in the 21st century without IPv6 support? :(
I would need that fixed before I could test this.
Well, the reason that I didn't try to implement IPv6 in the first
version is that unfortunately my provider
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Gerd Bavendiek
gerd.bavend...@googlemail.com wrote:
I have a ID 1199:6832 Sierra Wireless, Inc. MC8780 Device.
Unfortunately NetworkManager in Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic
was the last version I could use the device with. I recently checked
Ubuntu 11.04 Natty (coming
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Aleksander Morgado
aleksan...@lanedo.com wrote:
From a cursory reading of the bug reports you cited it seems like some
sierra modems crash when ModemManager sends CFUN=1 to them.
Can you help verify if this is indeed the case with yours as well?
So
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Aleksander Morgado
aleksan...@lanedo.com wrote:
Attached a patch which should do AT+CFUN=1 only if product ID is not
0x6832. Can you guys test it?
Minor fix in the previous patch, please use the one here instead.
I updated the package in my ppa with your
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
Great work, I've pushed this to the 'adsl' branch which I just created
off git master. Lets keep testing and after 0.9 comes out we'll merge
this right into 0.9.2. Any further patches you post can get dumped
right into
This is the third version, with some minor bugfixes.
Pantelis Koukousoulas (3):
ADSL: Settings and initial scaffolding
ADSL: Carrier Handling and PPP support
ADSL: Add libnm-glib and nmcli code
cli/src/connections.c| 66 -
cli/src/devices.c|4 +
cli
to
lookup interface index
[1304668252.347821] [nm-device.c:3912] nm_device_state_changed():
(ueagle-atm0): device is available,
In this version, we hack the nm-device.c:nm_device_get_priority() to get better
priority
instead of changing the DeviceType enum.
Signed-off-by: Pantelis Koukousoulas pkt
.
Relevant extract from logs:
info (ueagle-atm0): carrier now ON (device state 20)
info (ueagle-atm0): device state change: unavailable - disconnected (reason
'carrier-changed') [20 30 40]
Signed-off-by: Pantelis Koukousoulas pkt...@gmail.com
---
include/NetworkManager.h |1 +
src/nm-device
) successful, device
activated.
NetworkManager[29155]: info Activation (ueagle-atm0) Stage 5 of 5 (IP
Configure Commit) complete.
Signed-off-by: Pantelis Koukousoulas pkt...@gmail.com
---
cli/src/connections.c | 66 ++--
cli/src/devices.c |4 +
cli/src/settings.c
) successful, device
activated.
NetworkManager[1495]: info Activation (ueagle-atm0) Stage 5 of 5 (IP
Configure Commit) complete.
Signed-off-by: Pantelis Koukousoulas pkt...@gmail.com
---
configure.ac |1 +
include/NetworkManager.h |3 +
src/Makefile.am
to
lookup interface index
[1304668252.347821] [nm-device.c:3912] nm_device_state_changed():
(ueagle-atm0): device is available,
In this version, we hack the nm-device.c:nm_device_get_priority() to get better
priority
instead of changing the DeviceType enum.
Signed-off-by: Pantelis Koukousoulas pkt
-by: Pantelis Koukousoulas pkt...@gmail.com
---
include/NetworkManager.h |1 +
src/nm-device-adsl.c | 519 +-
src/nm-device-adsl.h |5 +-
src/ppp-manager/nm-ppp-manager.c | 31 +++-
src/settings/nm-settings.c |2
) successful, device
activated.
NetworkManager[29155]: info Activation (ueagle-atm0) Stage 5 of 5 (IP
Configure Commit) complete.
Signed-off-by: Pantelis Koukousoulas pkt...@gmail.com
---
cli/src/connections.c | 66 ++--
cli/src/devices.c |4 +
cli/src/settings.c
) successful, device
activated.
NetworkManager[29155]: info Activation (ueagle-atm0) Stage 5 of 5 (IP
Configure Commit) complete.
Signed-off-by: Pantelis Koukousoulas pkt...@gmail.com
---
cli/src/connections.c | 66 ++--
cli/src/devices.c |4 +
cli/src/settings.c
it to
3 patches, in a bisect-friendly way (after each patch, NM builds and does
something useful)
* I 'm now happily waiting for your comments / advice / testing etc :) :)
Cheers,
Pantelis
Pantelis Koukousoulas (3):
Settings and initial scaffolding
Carrier Handling and PPP
-by: Pantelis Koukousoulas pkt...@gmail.com
---
include/NetworkManager.h |1 +
src/nm-device-adsl.c | 519 +-
src/nm-device-adsl.h |5 +-
src/ppp-manager/nm-ppp-manager.c | 31 +++-
src/settings/nm-settings.c |2
priority, it was placed above
the ethernet device.
Signed-off-by: Pantelis Koukousoulas pkt...@gmail.com
---
include/NetworkManager.h | 18 +-
introspection/Makefile.am|1 +
introspection/nm-device-adsl.xml | 15 ++
libnm-util/Makefile.am |2 +
libnm-util/libnm
Maybe this can be a little off-topic, but is there any intent to add support
to PPPoE over wifi?
Maybe it is working already? When reading the source I think I saw that wired
is not required for PPPoE, but maybe I read wrong ...
Nevertheless, as an answer to this patch series it is indeed off
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
I personally have some random Zoom ueagle III based device, so I can at
least help test the carrier stuff and device detection.
Cool, thanks :) For now I have a problem in the device detection path, it seems
NetworkManager
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 08:32 -0400, Super Bisquit wrote:
Is it possible to add a none option to the --with-distro when
building.
This patch (for a previous version of cross linux from scratch) could give you
an idea on where you would need to hack to add this option:
Hi,
I just wanted to announce that I 'm going to be working on adding
support for ADSL
modems in NetworkManager for a while, as a nice project to learn NM
internals and
in order to finish what we started 2 years ago at Chania LUG's coding camp.
It also makes NetworkManager more complete (and if
35 matches
Mail list logo
