You can just type in your user password.
--Pat
On 11-01-12 11:09 PM, Violet*** wrote:
Hi My Name is Vi ~ I've always had Wi-Fi, but it was not password
protected. I just set it up to be password protected and when I log-in
My Linux is asking me to:
[Enter password for default keyring to unlock]
Make certain he has the Notification Area in the panel. Try adding a new
one to the panel.
--Pat
On 30/11/10 03:01 PM, Joao Ferreira gmail wrote:
Hello,
A friend of mine showed me a computer in which the nm-applet control
icon (top-right corner) does not appear.
It used to be there before bu
On 09/07/10 04:21 PM, Pat Suwalski wrote:
I just upgraded my system from 0.7.2 proper to 0.7.2.997. In the
process, I seem to have lost the ability to scan for access points.
nm-tool returns a blank list, but otherwise the output is identical. The
wired interface works perfectly.
Disregard. A
Hello,
I just upgraded my system from 0.7.2 proper to 0.7.2.997. In the
process, I seem to have lost the ability to scan for access points.
nm-tool returns a blank list, but otherwise the output is identical. The
wired interface works perfectly.
Using dbus-send and d-feet, there definitely a
settings, rather than
listing individual MAC addresses.
Pat Suwalski
diff -ur network-manager-0.8.orig/src/system-settings/nm-sysconfig-settings.c
network-manager-0.8/src/system-settings/nm-sysconfig-settings.c
--- network-manager-0.8.orig/src/system-settings/nm-sysconfig-settings.c
2010-
Hi,
I was wondering if there was a way to apply something like
no-auto-default to all devices, where one config file would work for all
machines. Basically, I don't want to hardcode a MAC address.
This is nm 0.7.2. I effectively want the system settings daemon
disabled, as I'm dealing with h
Hello,
I just spend quite a bit of time debugging a problem as a result of poor
wording in the D-Bus Interface Specification:
http://projects.gnome.org/NetworkManager/developers/spec.html
Maybe it's since been corrected, but it states that the
Connection.Updated() signal:
settings - a{sa
On Mar 18, 2010, at 20:49, Dan Williams wrote:
>> Is that the intended behaviour? To me, autoconnect indicates that it's
>
> Yes.
>
>> to be automatically connected unless I tell it otherwise, which is what
>> deactivateConnection() would logically do.
>
> You're probably looking for the Disco
Hello,
I'm playing with NetworkManager 0.80, specifically the (new) autoconnect
feature.
I've found that if autoconnect is set to true on a Connection, the
backend runs GetSettings() on all of the Connections that have
autoconnect set and brings them up. This appears correct.
However, if I
On 08/03/10 04:24 PM, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
As far as I understand, there can be single user settings service which
is registered on system bus. How is it expected to work together with
fast user switching? E.g. I had to check something under clean user
account, so I started second X session an
If you use gnome jetting in insecure mode it uses a clear text file in
your home directory.
--Pat
On 2009-10-11, at 18:28, "D.P." wrote:
Hi, people
[ system archlinux, kernel 2.6.31.3-brainfuck modified,
netbook acer aspire one, networkmanager 0.7.1, xfce 4.6.1 ]
0. The first issue - nm-a
Kos wrote:
> hey,
>
> I came across the following mockup
> (http://onlinedev.blogspot.com/2008/02/shape-of-things-to-come.html) and
> I really liked it.
> It is clean and simple.
>
> I would be happy to see it implemented.
It shows a little more information than most users would be interested
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> Well, I'll try to take a good look at this thing when I get it. Maybe
> the information can be of help in some way.
Having worked on this part of the eeePC, I have some useful information.
The atl2 driver on the unit works great, the upstream source
James M. Leddy wrote:
>> In the former case you do need to make
>> sure that the AP is set up for a password, and you'd better hope that
>> the AP uses the same string-to-key as NM.
>
> Isn't that standardized?
Not nearly as much as it should be. Perhaps the situation has improved
in modern ti
Aaron Konstam wrote:
> I am confused as usual. You are seeming to say that 40/128 ASCII
> passphrase are for APs that already have a passwphrase stored in their
> memory.
>
> But then things get confusing. Are you saying that a 40/128 HEX
> passphrase can actually change the passphrase stored in t
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
> Now I have gnome running, just to set things up and I use the
> networkmanager applet but eventually I don't want to use gnome (I have
> it installed and won't delete it but don't want to run it) but a very
> simple window manager only. Is there a way to run t
Giovanni Lovato wrote:
> How can I use a PKCS12 certificate to authenticate against a WPA
> wireless network? Setting it on Client/Key certificate doesn't work...
I'm not up to speed on the pkcs12 functionality of NM, but in the past I
had to:
openssl pkcs12 -in cert.p12 -out cert.pem
T
Hi Bruce,
bruce wrote:
> I have FC5, running gnome, and NetworkManager. The Network apps have been
> installed, and verified as being on the laptop. The processes (ps -aux |
> grep Net) shows the Network Manager process as running. Also, nn-applet is
> running.
If nm-applet is indeed running, it
Hello Aaron,
Aaron Konstam wrote:
> Lets try again. CVI => CVS
> And the question is how does one download a src version of NM in order
> to compile it from a SVN database?
From:
http://developer.gnome.org/tools/svn.html
Just type:
svn co http://svn.gnome.org/svn/NetworkManager/t
Phix wrote:
> All I have to do here is enter my WPA-PSK and it connects flawlessly.
> How do I configure my system so it connects automatically, like on my
> sister's opensuse system?
Hello.
I think you are a little confused. The password you need to enter is the
one to unlock your keyring, which
Derek Broughton wrote:
> The problem with that would be that the flood of messages already
> doesn't make much sense. More isn't necessarily better.
You keep saying that. But more is better in this case. Especially if the
messages are from a different vantage point, and in this case, from the
s
Derek Broughton wrote:
> I don't think the driver does - because, as I say, it normally scans
> and associates without any trouble. It's wpa_supplicant that seems to
> break things.
You're comparing a one-time scan ("iwlist scan") with continuous
scanning that actually makes wpa_supplicant (and
Derek Broughton wrote:
> You have a different definition of "apparent" than I do :-(
It literally shows everything it does, is what "apparent" means to me.
> wpa_supplicant puts out way more information than I can use, and none
> of it seems remotely helpful. When I connect to an unsecured wirel
Rohit Kumbhar wrote:
> I 'm sorry I didn't put that question correctly. How does NM determine
> the authentication type for a *new* connection? The folder for
> hasn't been created under my
> .gconf/system/networking/wireless/networks/ yet.
The connection type comes from the feedback NetworkMana
M. Willis Monroe wrote:
> I only say this because it's somewhat of a pain killing NM both the
> daemon and the applet, then restarting dbus (which kills many other
> programs) and NM and the applet when you're done.
You shouldn't need to do it quite like that. On Ubuntu, I just stop the
daemon
George Whitmore wrote:
> I just saw this post and I'm having almost the same issues of NO
> connection with ANY WPA encryption settings.
> I noticed your explanination that editing the config file is NOT needed.
> Got a problem with that as Ubuntu wiki "how to" for installing
> wpa_supplicant IS
Stian Jordet wrote:
> I have a problem that NetworkManager often (but not always) don't find
> my wireless network after a resume. It always works after a fresh boot,
> it sometimes work after resume. It always finds my neighbours
> unencrypted network everytime, but I don't know if my WEP-encrypti
Darren Albers wrote:
> Debian Etch (Due in December), Ubuntu Dapper/Edgy, and slackware 10.2
> (The only distro's I have any knowledge of) all have Glib >=2.10 so
> none of the changes will affect them but Debian Stable currently has
> 2.8.
2.6.4, even.
--Pat
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 2) I'm a ultraportable user, so my screen is limited to 1024x768. It's
> irksome that the configuration screen is larger vertically than resolution
> -- have to ALT-F7 and move it around just to see the options.
I took a look at the glade file to see if it could be easi
Dan Williams wrote:
> I don't think it should; but this may be affected by ap_scan value. In
> any case, we shouldn't consider roaming by the driver as association
> loss, and neither should wpa_supplicant.
What seems to happen is that iwconfig shows that it continues hopping
even if wpa_supplica
Hello,
I'm just having a heck of a time connecting to access points at OLS with
NetworkManager. It seems that many, many people are in the same position.
The network setup here is several WRT54G's running OpenWRT, all with the
ESSID "linux", no security.
What happens is that nm constantly hops b
Pierre Marc Dumuid wrote:
> If I connect to a wired network.. do a wireless scan for the ESSID's in
> the area (and possibly the MAC addresses of the routers) and auto-set
> the IP / Gateway / DNS info based on the wireless router's in the area..
I believe this is an inherently bad idea. Especi
Michael Doube wrote:
> I've generally failed to get good functionality out of NetworkManager -
> it's been easier to use ifup et al., I think becuase NM doesn't seem to
> recognise my security settings (I use an open security mode, not
> restricted, and an ASCII WEP key) . There's nowhere to tell N
Jon Nettleton wrote:
> The reason it is not designed like this is for security. If firefox
> stores it's passwords in a keyring ( it doesn't yet ), and you download
> random spyware/virus from the web and launch it, with the cookie jar
> method the rogue program would have access to all your web p
Jon Nettleton wrote:
> I think he is talking about the application acl dialog box, not the
> password dialog. This should happen once for each keyring item that is
> accessed by nm-edit. Selecting always allow should work so you are
> never prompted to allow nm-edit to that keyring key again. I
Dan Williams wrote:
> That's odd. Once you've typed your password in once, it should unlock
> the keyring and you shouldn't have to type a password again until the
> timeout, or until you log out. That's how it works for other apps, and
> for the nm-applet in particular. Otherwise it would just
One of the problems I'm having with getting my nm-edit program to be
user friendly is that gnome-keyring asks about every single key that the
user tries to access.
I notice that all of the keys are just stored in the "default" keyring.
My question is: would it make sense to store all of the Netwo
Vincent wrote:
> When implementing this, please also make a "delete profile" (or whatever
> you want to call it) button. I had this new unsecured network I could
> connect to, which after a few days all of a sudden is secured. Now
> everytime I login and this network is spotted it askes for a passw
Antony J Mee wrote:
> More immediately, the static IP config stuff could be
> implemented quite trivially as yup ... you've guessed it...
> a ~cough~ VPN ~cough~ plugin. The architecture provides a
> neat dbus interface precisely to set 'static' IP4Config,
> routing information etc. one some inter
Jeff Moore wrote:
> I am hoping that something like the nm-edit suggestion below is in the
> works or is already implemented. I don't have a very good knowledge of
> the inner workings of NM so I would like to ask all of you if there is
> something in place that would allow an individual to statica
Daniel Espinosa wrote:
> What about to have the oportunity to disable the DHCP of each
> connection, then you can allow the user to store static IP's for each
> network and save this data to a gconf key.
I'm all for it, but it has to be implemented in the applet before an
editor could take advanta
Robert Love wrote:
>> Before I get too far on the interface, I want to solidify some things.
>> First, only WEP keys are actually stored in human-readable form (the way
>> the user entered them). So, I can't think of a nice way to let users
>> handle something like WPA-PSK, unless nm-applet also
Hello Robert,
Robert Love wrote:
> We definitely need a wireless properties editor. I don't like the idea
> of having nm-applet provide UI for editing the entries, but we should
> have a separate (launchable from the applet, to be sure) utility for
> editing the stored networks.
I've decided
Hello,
I've noticed for a while now that nm-applet leaves around a little
square (presumably the remains of a menu or something) after some time
running (little screenshot attached).
I thought this was just Gentoo weirdness, but my Ubuntu install is doing
it too. I didn't realize it was nm-applet
Adam Guthrie wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to figure out how I can shutdown and restart
NetworkManager with the --no-daemon option (for debugging).
Right now my system starts NetworkManager and all the
related stuff when I start it up. I would like to be able to
shutdown -- and restart -- the daemon,
Joris Vuffray wrote:
I can confirm this behaviour on gentoo running gnome 2.14.
From time to time, nm-applet will ask for the keyring password two or
three times at the same time, popping two or three dialogs. Usually I
pick the first one of these dialogs to enter my password and then
everyth
Matthew Saltzman wrote:
Then use a non-broken mailer.
Suggestions for a non-broken, modern, text-mode mail client welcome.
Pine only offers reply-to-sender, reply-to-"reply-to", and reply-to-all.
Apparently, mutt is the same. That pretty much takes care of the ones
that jump to mind. mail,
Gene Heskett wrote:
Ok, so where do I set that in t-bird?
"Reply to all".
--Pat
___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
Hello,
My ath_pci card is showing signal strength at about half of what it
should be. This is consistent with how iwlist shows it, but the GNOME
wireless applet has always shown it correctly.
I don't know off-hand if it's always special cased, but it looks like it
might have to be. Maybe when the
Hello,
I recently installed NetworkManager 0.6.1 (-r2 in Gentoo), and went back
to my Atheros card.
I can't associate with WPA anymore for some reason, but I'll need more
time to figure that out. As fallback, I tried a good old WEP association.
Interestingly, the dhclient usage info showed up in
Robert Love wrote:
I think many users these days, and most users going forward, use
passphrases, so the best bet we can have is default to "passphrase" as
the key type and expect our users to change it if needed. Otherwise, as
Dan wrote, we are just asking for confusion.
Hm. Well, then somethi
Robert Love wrote:
Basically:
WEP key: 26 characters, [A-F]|[a-f]|[0-9]
String: < 26 characters, no restrictions.
I am saying, my passphrase is a legitimate hex key.
It cannot work beautifully if ASCII and Hex keys are also valid
passphrases.
I don't see how -- to the best
Robert Love wrote:
This won't fly.
As just one example, my passphrase at home is a legitimate hex key (I
am, yes, an idiot). Differentiating between ASCII and passphrase is
even harder. We need to ask.
I've seen this in an implementation. It works beautifully.
Basically:
WEP key: 2
Dennis Kaarsemaker wrote:
...and of course Murphy loves me and decided that somehow madwifi scuks
even harder than I thought - with the neccessary patches applied to NM
and the madwifi Driver all worked fine a few days ago but today it
decided not to do WPA anymore. So I won't be able to test unt
Robert Love wrote:
_
Authentication type: | Open system \/ |
|-|
| Shared key |
| 802.1x |
'-'
The problem with this is that once
Eli Criffield wrote:
NM should still try to be the way all linux systems (servers included)
configure there network. That would include a drop dead easy applet
that makes smart guesses about what you want, and a text interface if
your system doesn't even running X, probably even text configuratio
Darren Albers wrote:
> Have you tried the patch posted by Dan that patchs madwifi-ng to tell
> NetworkManager that it supports WPA?
>
> http://madwifi.org/ticket/444
>
> With that patch NetworkManager sees my Atheros card as supporting WPA.
Yeah, that definitely got it. Good stuff!
I spent hour
Hello,
I'm trying to get NetworkManager running with madwifi and wpa-psk. It
tends to work (after a long association time) with WEP, but with wpa it
just pops up a message saying "The requested wireless network requires
security capabilities unsupported by your hardware."
I know it should work, s
58 matches
Mail list logo
