I am not able to connect to my companies WPA2 enterprise wireless.
A windows-savvy network friend of mine says he thinks the problem is:
"the company is not using client-side certificates AFAIK. The problem
is probably that the certificate is invalid (expired) because our PKI
at the company is no
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> active device support to NM SVN trunk this weekend; each device is now
> independent and can be active/inactive irrespective of any other device.
ya!
:-)
___
NetworkManager-l
On 11/1/07, Darren Albers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First of all I am not a Dev so if you are upset at my comment do not
> reference the devs but to me. I don't want their hard work being
> diminished by me ;-). I
well I didn't mean my tone to be "upset" with anyone, exactly. I
simply want
On 10/28/07, Darren Albers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not a dev but my first thought was "Great idea" but then I
> realized that it is probably way too much info for the user. In
> /most/ cases the user will see a large number of AP's and will pick
> the one with the best signal and this i
I don't know how you should get started ... but here is my vote for
that as a a worthy feature.
P
On 8/16/07, Doug Anson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi:
>
>
>
> I'm new to NetworkManager and have an interest in coding up a new feature
> into it. I think it would be great to have the abil
On 8/8/07, Thomas M Steenholdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's strange. I've been running with that device for ages with no
> problem at all. What's your distro/version etc.?
>
>
SLED10 -- no sp1 yet
> By me and yes - but it's a hack in the current state of affairs.
> > 3)if simply changing t
On 8/8/07, Thomas M Steenholdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As to why we don't just use the AP_SCAN 1 "workaround" -> AP_SCAN 2
> works for other drivers, it should work for the iwl4965 people too. This
> is a problem of fixing things in the place that need fixing, not working
> around thing every
On 8/8/07, Thomas M Steenholdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> wpa_supplicant only - ap_scan=1:
>
> The hidden network is found during the scanning, but is never identified
> as my network, since wpa_supplicant expects a certain SSID and the
> hidden net shows an SSID of "" (SSID mismatch). The devi
On 8/8/07, Thomas M Steenholdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The right way to fix the problem as I see it, would probably be to get
> the mac80211 pre-auth scanning working properly.
whatever the "right way" is, this really needs to be fixed. NM is
entirely needed for users who depend on gui utili
On 8/6/07, Thomas M Steenholdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'll force it to use 1 or 2 this evening, and see what kind of success
> that will give me.
>
> I'll keep you guys posted.
Thank you Thomas.
If changing this value works, then the next challenge for me will be
figuring out how to do
On 8/5/07, Peter Van Lone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ps -- forgot to include that I'm using SLED10
___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
On 8/5/07, Darren Albers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have seen others post the same issues and they generally have
> various levels of success by using wpa_supplicant with ap_scan=2 or 1.
> I forgot which one NM uses but you may have need to use the other to
> connect to a hidden AP however
12 matches
Mail list logo
