e correct firewall(s) rule(s) should replace both.
I'm not sure either whether we should be punching holes in the firewall
automatically or if this is the proper way to do that. I'm especially
not sure if we should be calling firewall-cmd instead of talking D-Bus
and if it's all righ
Hello,
I just added a change request for the patch to make it work.
Regards,
Thomas
On 11/21/2016 01:10 PM, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
Hi poma,
please raise the issue with the firewalld developers. It could be that
we indeed have a circular dependency and should break it down.
Related: https://gi
Hello Matej,
On 02/13/2012 11:12 AM, Matej Kovacic wrote:
Hi,
The first patch updates FirewallD DBus service& path& interface.
The second one adds calling of FirewallD1.zone.removeInterface method
during device deactivation.
Firewall Manager package is already available? Or when we can expe
Hello Jiri,
On 02/10/2012 04:45 PM, Jiri Popelka wrote:
The first patch updates FirewallD DBus service& path& interface.
The second one adds calling of FirewallD1.zone.removeInterface method
during device deactivation.
Jiri Popelka (2):
firewall: update FirewallD DBus service& path& inte
Hello Ludwig,
On 07/27/2011 01:45 PM, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
Jiri Popelka wrote:
On 06/30/2011 11:11 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 19:03 +0200, Thomas Woerner wrote:
we were talking some time ago about classification of network
connections according to their trust level in
