On 29 November 2012 13:03, Pavel Simerda psimerda redhat com wrote:
From: footkeong Chien fkchien_...@hotmail.com
I would like to know whether there is any alternative way to set
static ip for Ubuntu using command lines without affecting the
etc/network/interfaces.
...
Is this a
On 12 December 2011 09:29, Jeff Hoogland jeffhoogl...@linux.com wrote:
Attached are the two outputs you requested, digging through them now to see
if I can pinpoint the issue.
Did you find out anything?
I converted the outputs to csv, loaded them into an OpenOffice
spreadsheet, summed up
On 12 December 2011 06:33, Jeff Hoogland jeffhoogl...@linux.com
wrote:
but the issue I am having is that this newer version is using nearly
110megs more RAM than version 0.8.0 does - any ideas why this might
be?
Technical progress...
Seriously, have you checked where the difference comes
On 17 November 2011 21:08, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
Based on our IRC debugging yesterday, I've gone ahead and pushed a fix
to ModemManager that uses only USB interface 0 for PPP on these devices
since that's what the Windows driver indicates. The driver didn't have
a section for
On 15 November 2011 10:45, Joseph Gunn gun...@curlycloud.com wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:19:13 +0200
Uwe Geuder networkmanagerlist-ugeu...@snkmail.com wrote:
Probably the implementers of the N900 reasoned a bit like me: Because
entering the PIN is not relevant at the AT modem interface
On 13 November 2011 19:49, Thomas Bechtold thomasbecht...@jpberlin.de wrote:
i tried NM 0.9 (latest from git) with MM 0.5 (from ubuntu 11.10) and
recognized that MM does not detect a wrong SIM-Pin (with a Nokia N900).
i used a wrong Pin (1234) and got the attached NM logs when i tried to
On 15 November 2011 09:12, Thomas Bechtold thomasbecht...@jpberlin.de wrote:
i just tested with a N900.It's more a general question and not a specific
problem with the N900.
Ok. Then my general remark would be: Aren't all phones used like that,
that they are first powered on and registered to
However, no it looks in OpenSUSE I cannot even run ifup br0
when network manager is running.
Thanks for your answer.
On 6 September 2011 06:59, Bin Li wrote:
The best way is to use ifup mode in openSUSE,
Yes, I've already managed to use my WLAN connections with ifup. However,
I could not
If I understood it correctly in Debian/Ubuntu network manager will leave
additional interfaces defined in /etc/interfaces unmanaged.
So you can combine your main internet access managed by networkmanager
(eth0, wlan0, ppp0 depending on where you are) with additional manual
network setting you
I understand that this a upstream list and most readers are interested
in the bleeding edge. However, I have to support some systems for
naive users and I prefer to use a plain vanilla distribution as long
as possible. So please bear with my question regarding versions
straight from the museum...
Thanks Dan for your quick reply. It's too late here for taking more
logs so let me just reply quickly on your other questions.
Huh, because they are $120 on eBay which isn't cheap at all :)
Otherwise I'd buy one.
This operator http://saunalahti.fi/ gives you one for free even you
just shop for
Hi!
Hm. I'm looking through lots of NetworkManager pages/docs and the GIT
repositories, and I see that there has been something titled Local
caching nameserver support using dnsmasq added in 0.8.2.
Interesting. I'm using Ubuntu LTS so I'm not at the leading edge with
nm, I guess it's 0.8.
Hi!
I've never understood how network manager works if more than
1 network interface is in use. Is it designed for such usage at all?
What I want to do:
- use wlan0 to connect to the internet using network manager. Access
points might change from time to time, e.g. when travelling.
- use
13 matches
Mail list logo
