Thomas Haller schreef op 06-10-2016 14:28:
In such a setup the actual address doesn't matter. 0.0.0.0 should work
just fine.
That's very interesting, thank you.
___
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org
Greg Oliver schreef op 05-10-2016 22:55:
The easiest is if your server pushes them with push.
You are absolutely correct - and I do that for our company. Other
companies that we are partners with where our engineers log into their
networks do not like it when they push default routes on us th
Greg Oliver schreef op 05-10-2016 22:10:
I cannot remember the last networkManager this worked in (GUI), but I
am trying to add static routes for VPN connections and it no longer
takes interfaces as gateways. Not knowing the IP of the gateway until
connection, what is the proper procedure for ad
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre schreef op 26-07-2016 7:04:
Ternary tends to mean "having three parts", and has other significance
in
IT. Using "Tertiary" seems to be a better choice, even though they may
both be used interchangeably (afaict from dictionary.com anyway).
In the Dutch language apparent
Beniamino Galvani schreef op 21-07-2016 10:10:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 09:54:03AM +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
How do I check that dnsmasq is using the server? NetworkManager
started
dnsmasq with
/usr/sbin/dnsmasq --no-resolv --keep-in-foreground --no-hosts
--bind-interfaces --pid-file=/run/Netw
A user reported having two dhcp-option in his config, either pushed by
the server or local, I don't know yet.
One of the dhcp-option was faulty, it was 10.8.0.1 but there was no
response from that server apparently.
The order given was:
public internet DNS
private VPN DNS
In the log from Ne
Francesco Giudici schreef op 19-05-2016 10:16:
Hi Xen,
thanks for sharing your thoughts, we are always glad to receive
advice
on how to improve NetworkManager and make it more user friendly.
There is already a nCurses interface to NM: nmtui (please, give it a
try!).
We found from the
Francesco Giudici schreef op 17-05-2016 23:39:
Hi,
a couple of months ago we launched the survey on NetworkManager
usage.
We want to share a short summary of the main outcomes:
https://people.freedesktop.org/~fgiudici/NMsurvey/
It is also available in pdf format if you prefer:
https://people
Dan Williams schreef op 05-04-16 19:47:
> On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 10:53 +0200, Xen wrote:
>> Question:
>>
>> Currently when NM manages a link/device (say eth0) any attempt to
>> manually configure it (using e.g. ifconfig) will quickly result in
>> this
>> acti
Question:
Currently when NM manages a link/device (say eth0) any attempt to
manually configure it (using e.g. ifconfig) will quickly result in this
action being undone by NM.
Should there be any sense of not interfering with manual configuration?
I mean in a general sense what you see happening
Using an ULA (as long as it is stable) is really the same as ignoring
the first 64 bits. Any number that never changes can be ignored in a
computation, or ceases being a variable in that sense (quite literally).
Op 22-3-2016 om 16:17 schreef Xen:
Meaning, he wants his router to generate an
The issue is getting a bit cloudy here because you are responding to
such disperse things in isolation So I don't know really what it's
about at this point. But thank you for the discussion regardless. I'm
intending to install Linux just so I can use Calligra just so I can have
a reasonably
Using an ULA (as long as it is stable) is really the same as ignoring
the first 64 bits. Any number that never changes can be ignored in a
computation, or ceases being a variable in that sense (quite literally).
Op 22-3-2016 om 16:17 schreef Xen:
Meaning, he wants his router to generate an
Op 22-3-2016 om 11:10 schreef Tim Coote:
There are further complications arising from ISP disconnection or prefix
renumbering. Homenet rfcs discuss the use of ULAs (similar in concept to rfc
1918 addresses) to handle the startup situation of building a house before its
connected to an ISP, bu
Op 21-3-2016 om 13:43 schreef Stuart D. Gathman:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016, Xen wrote:
"Addressable" is NOT the same thing as "exposed". Any sane IPv6
There is a fundamental issue with this and that is that this is a rather
arbitrary "sanest method of configuratio
Op 21-3-2016 om 11:23 schreef Tim Coote:
If Bart’s view is typical, I guess that the answer to my original
question is ‘No’. That’s a shame as further separation of the various
Linux models (embedded, networking, phone, tablet, desktop, server,
cloud), is, imo, unhelpful. But at least it give
Op 21-3-2016 om 11:23 schreef Tim Coote:
If Bart’s view is typical, I guess that the answer to my original
question is ‘No’. That’s a shame as further separation of the various
Linux models (embedded, networking, phone, tablet, desktop, server,
cloud), is, imo, unhelpful. But at least it give
Op 21-3-2016 om 14:05 schreef Thomas Haller:
Note that there are also private stable addresses:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7217
https://blogs.gnome.org/lkundrak/2015/12/03/networkmanager-and-privacy-in-the-ipv6-internet/
Thomas
Hi thanks.
That part seems to actually be a good feature,
Op 21-3-2016 om 00:29 schreef Stuart Gathman:
On 03/20/2016 11:36 AM, Xen wrote:
By the way, if UPnP was ever a problem in terms of NAT security,
obviously the problem is much worse in IPv6, since there is not even
any NAT and all devices are always exposed.
"Addressable" is NO
f IPv6 gives some freedom or liberation, it is mostly due to the
router allowing this. Everyone his own IP address. Everyone his own
front door. People love that, in a way. But it also means you no longer
have a family.
Op 20-3-2016 om 16:05 schreef Xen:
Op 20-3-2016 om 11:56 schreef Ti
are alarm clocks that
stop working if your internet access goes down.
This system is not good Is all I'm saying.
I hope this informs some of the decisions being made. Good luck.
Bye. Bart.
Op 20-3-2016 om 16:36 schreef Xen:
By the way, if UPnP was ever a problem in terms of NAT security,
f IPv6 gives some freedom or liberation, it is mostly due to the
router allowing this. Everyone his own IP address. Everyone his own
front door. People love that, in a way. But it also means you no longer
have a family.
Op 20-3-2016 om 16:05 schreef Xen:
Op 20-3-2016 om 11:56 schreef Ti
Op 20-3-2016 om 11:56 schreef Tim Coote:
Is it intended that NetworkManager will conform to /support / exploit
the Homenet network name and address assignment and routeing protocols
(http://bit.ly/1LyAE7H), either to provide end to end connectivity or
to provide a monitoring layer so that the a
Just want to say that I have been trying (in OpenSUSE) to get a rather
simple scenario working, but failed, probably due to kernel mechanics:
- main connection receives all traffic destined for port 80, 443.
- VPN receives all else.
I just consider it a more special case of directing VPN traffi
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015, Simon Geard wrote:
On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 17:18 +0200, Xen wrote:
In a command line shell you will just never learn or remember to
write Ne instead of ne..
Why would I need to? I just type 'ne' and tab, and let (case
insensitive) command-line completi
On 09/14/2015 01:35 PM, Thomas Haller wrote:
On Sat, 2015-09-12 at 19:56 +0200, Xen wrote:
==
Seriously I would suggest to get rid of the CamelCase name. It
breaks compatibility or congruency with a lot of other things and
as a user you are constantly wondering
Hi, thanks for your responses.
On 09/14/2015 02:10 PM, Thomas Haller wrote:
You bring up so many different points, that it's hard to keep track of
them. It would be better to discuss them individually or open Bugs for
it.
I know, just imagine having to file bug reports for all of them ;-).
K
Hi,
It's not that I ever really liked NM, but.
After I set up my VPN with dispatcher.d scripts (it seems my SuSE
install doesn't automatically call any ifup.d scripts but then it
doesn't have /etc/network/ either. ;-)).
I managed to also integrate it with the plasma applet thing for KDE 4,
28 matches
Mail list logo
