On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Sven Nielsen wrote:
> Yes, every card / driver is different ;) And documentation on the parameters
> is sparse usually..
>
> If your driver supports some "undefined" positive sens value you can
> experiment with different settings and
> see if you find some rela
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Sven Nielsen wrote:
> Yes, every card / driver is different ;) And documentation on the parameters
> is sparse usually..
>
> If your driver supports some "undefined" positive sens value you can
> experiment with different settings and
> see if you find some rela
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 3:26 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> I have now tried a test with a different laptop running the following
> wireless:
> 03:03.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 2200BG
> [Calexico2] Network Connection (rev 05)
>
> [root@lapmike2 ~]# lsmod|
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 2:21 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
>> iwconfig wlan0 sens -65
>> I get:
>> Error for wireless request "Set Sensitivity" (8B08) :
>> SET failed on device wlan0 ; Operation not supported.
>>
>> I was doing this as root so it
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 2:11 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> I seem to have been thwarted at the first try - I had done the
> walkaround and found the mid point but when I set the sens value by
> doing
> iwconfig wlan0 sens -65
> I get:
> Error for wireless request "
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Sven Nielsen wrote:
> No, according to "man iwconfig" it would mean setting it to some negative
> value:
> Go to the location in the middle between your access points. You find this by
> issuing "iwlist scan"
> repeatedly. Monitor the "Signal level": If both AP
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Sven Nielsen wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 20:17:27 +0000
> mike cloaked wrote:
>
>> I totally agree but I would like to know where any misconfiguration
>> has happened - all I do is boot the machine and NetworkManager shows
>>
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Sven Nielsen wrote:
> I am sorry that there seems to be some issues with the software/hardware you
> are using.
>
> You can try if fine-tuning the "sens" parameter of iwconfig helps.
>
> Check the signal level you get with iwconfig, then adapt the sens value, and
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:06 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Sven Nielsen wrote:
>>> >
>>> > That is of course fine - but there are use cases where the two APs are
>>> > both in one's own home - and both have the same ssi
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Sven Nielsen wrote:
>> >
>> > That is of course fine - but there are use cases where the two APs are
>> > both in one's own home - and both have the same ssid and that
>> > presents a problem - at least for me.
>> >
> I cannot see the problem either. I think yo
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> Is there a way to get NM to always choose the one with the strongest
>> signal at the time of making the initial connection?
>
> Not at this time, but it's reasonable to pick the highest signal
> strength AP if there are two connections for
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Jirka Klimes wrote:
> On Thursday 10 of February 2011 14:20:12 Byte Soup wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I was wondering about the reason codes Im seeing in my /var/log/syslog, for
>> example:
>>
>> Feb 10 13:15:57 Homer NetworkManager: (eth1): supplicant connection
>> s
2011/1/11 José Queiroz :
> I could swear that this was already discussed here, but the only reference I
> found was another message of mine.
>
> In the lack of good references, I ran to my kubuntu box. I also have an ESS
> in my home.
>
> My syslog shows several messages from wpa_supplicant about
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Franco Miceli
wrote:
> Mike,
>
> I have been dealing with the AP algorithm selection a few months ago. The
> one that selects the best connection is NM. If you get the src you can see
> it in the file nm-device-wifi.c (for the wireless connections).
>
> The way it
-- Forwarded message --
From: mike cloaked
Date: 2011/1/9
Subject: Re: NetworkManager connection priority - same ssid ?
To: José Queiroz
2011/1/9 José Queiroz :
> AFAIK, the selection of which AP to connect, in a ESSID, is done by
> "wpa_supplicant", not by NM
I have a home LAN where there are two wireless access points. I run
Fedora F14 and use NetworkManager to connect. The access points both
use the *same* ssid and encryption to try to make a seamless wifi
network around the house.
How does NetworkManager decide on which of the two APs to connect to
16 matches
Mail list logo
