On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 14:39 -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 13:21 +0100, Thomas Haller wrote:
> >
> > Patch lgtm, but it doesn't apply anywhere.
>
> Sorry, patch was against 1.0.
I actually tried it on 1.0. But somehow I messed up, because now the
patch cleanly applies there..
On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 13:21 +0100, Thomas Haller wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 17:03 -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
> > The existing checks assumed that all AP/AdHoc connections would use
> > the
> > shared IP method. But what we really want to check for here is
> > whether the
> > connection is AP/A
On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 17:03 -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
> The existing checks assumed that all AP/AdHoc connections would use
> the
> shared IP method. But what we really want to check for here is
> whether the
> connection is AP/AdHoc. Leave the existing 'shared' check for
> backwards
> compatibi
The existing checks assumed that all AP/AdHoc connections would use the
shared IP method. But what we really want to check for here is whether the
connection is AP/AdHoc. Leave the existing 'shared' check for backwards
compatibility.
Also move the check above the timestamp check, since the user
