There's no doubt that periodic scanning is indeed important and convenient.
But there's not always the case that people want to actually know about all
the networks around them, but they just want to connect to a specific one.
For example, if you have wired connection you most likely want to conne
On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 16:53 +0100, Peter Roediger wrote:
> Alright, but wouldn't it be way smarter to just scan for wireless
> networks on unplugging the wired network? Then it would connect
> immediately and automatically to the preferred network without any
> user interaction.
> This is somethin
On Tue, 2006-12-26 at 14:18 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > SSID before. It's all based of SSID, and while that may have worked in
> > the past, we'll probably have to change that to some combination of SSID
> > +BSSID sooner rather than later.
>
> I s
On 12/28/06, Timo Hoenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> KNetworkManager tells NetworkManager that there is user interaction --
> which in turn raises the scanning frequency -- whenever there is a mouse
> enter event on the tray icon.
Thanks Timo!
___
Net
On Thursday 28 December 2006 11:53, Peter Roediger wrote:
> Alright, but wouldn't it be way smarter to just scan for wireless networks
> on unplugging the wired network? Then it would connect immediately and
> automatically to the preferred network without any user interaction.
> This is something
Alright, but wouldn't it be way smarter to just scan for wireless networks
on unplugging the wired network? Then it would connect immediately and
automatically to the preferred network without any user interaction.
This is something that probably needs to be changed in nm itself but not in
the app
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-12-25 at 10:11 -0500, Darren Albers wrote:
> On 12/24/06, Peter Roediger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1) My laptop (like many other laptops i think) has a bright and, when not
> > connected, flashing LED for the ipw2200 which I turn off when I'm on the
> > wired network. When t
Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> SSID before. It's all based of SSID, and while that may have worked in
> the past, we'll probably have to change that to some combination of SSID
> +BSSID sooner rather than later.
I still don't understand why you need this change. Why is the SSID
not
On Mon, 2006-12-25 at 09:54 -0500, Darren Albers wrote:
> On 12/24/06, Timothy Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 25 December 2006 00:53, Darren Albers wrote:
> >
> > > Ok so lets narrow the focus to just the issues you are having, next
> > > time you reboot and it does not see your ac
On 12/24/06, Peter Roediger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> As I'm using a dhcp served network now, with both, wired and wireless LAN
> available, i thought i should give the current stable version (0.6.4) of
> network manager a try. I'm on a pretty customized debian unstable, with
> 2.6.1
On 12/24/06, Timothy Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 25 December 2006 00:53, Darren Albers wrote:
>
> > Ok so lets narrow the focus to just the issues you are having, next
> > time you reboot and it does not see your access point if you run the
> > command iwlist scanning does it sho
On Sun, 2006-12-24 at 18:28 +0100, Peter Roediger wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> As I'm using a dhcp served network now, with both, wired and wireless
> LAN available, i thought i should give the current stable version
> (0.6.4) of network manager a try. I'm on a pretty customized debian
> unstable, with 2.
On Monday 25 December 2006 00:53, Darren Albers wrote:
> Ok so lets narrow the focus to just the issues you are having, next
> time you reboot and it does not see your access point if you run the
> command iwlist scanning does it show all the access
> points after a few runs?
I think I've made a
On 12/24/06, Timothy Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If it were always like that I would be happy;
> but if I re-boot it may or may not come up like this.
> NM may see only one network, or it may see none.
> As I said, NM in my experience is completely unpredictable.
>
Ok so lets narrow the fo
On Sunday 24 December 2006 21:43, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> There are two things that involve keys in your wireless link:
> authentication (are you allowed to connect to the access point) and
> encryption (is the data you send and receive over the air encrypted). If
> you use WEP, then your data
On Sunday 24 December 2006 21:43, Darren Albers wrote:
> What you are calling Open are really unencrypted access points, though
> I guess it is common for people to call them open, but when you select
> WEP there are open and shared modes and that is what we are talking
> about so lets forget abou
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> On Sunday 24 December 2006 17:54, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
>
>>> I checked my access point (a Linksys WRT54LG running dd-wrt)
>>> and there is no mention of "shared" or "open" that I can see.
>>> I am asked if I want to use a key, and if so what kind
>>>
On 12/24/06, Timothy Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 24 December 2006 17:54, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
>
> > > I checked my access point (a Linksys WRT54LG running dd-wrt)
> > > and there is no mention of "shared" or "open" that I can see.
> > > I am asked if I want to use a key, and if
On Fri, 2006-12-22 at 19:42 -0500, Darren Albers wrote:
>
> > No.
> > It always tries to connect to a network I very seldom use.
>
> Are both open network or is one WEP and the other open? I /think/
> that Network Manager will not automatically connect to an unencrypted
> network but I am not ce
On Sunday 24 December 2006 17:54, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > I checked my access point (a Linksys WRT54LG running dd-wrt)
> > and there is no mention of "shared" or "open" that I can see.
> > I am asked if I want to use a key, and if so what kind
> > (WEP, WPA, RADIUS, etc).
>
> My Netgear config
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> On Saturday 23 December 2006 23:47, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
>
>>> What exactly is the different between "shared" and "open"?
>>> I just have a key set on my access point,
>>> and I give that key on each machine accessing the AP.
>>> Is that shared or op
Hi all!
As I'm using a dhcp served network now, with both, wired and wireless LAN
available, i thought i should give the current stable version (0.6.4) of
network manager a try. I'm on a pretty customized debian unstable, with
2.6.19 kernel, an ipw2200 (driver version 1.2.0) network card and wire
On Saturday 23 December 2006 23:47, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > What exactly is the different between "shared" and "open"?
> > I just have a key set on my access point,
> > and I give that key on each machine accessing the AP.
> > Is that shared or open?
> >
> > Actually, I tried replying both "sh
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> On Saturday 23 December 2006 02:00, Darren Albers wrote:
>>
>> This is off topic for this list but I still have no idea what this:
>> "with files all over the place" means On my system they are in the
>> location I expect them to be.
>
> In the clas
On Sat, 2006-12-23 at 03:38 +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> On Saturday 23 December 2006 02:00, Darren Albers wrote:
>
> > > I should say that I am using KDE rather than Gnome.
> > > It seems that NetworkManager leans fairly heavily towards Gnome.
> > > Maybe it is not a good choice for KDE users?
On Saturday 23 December 2006 02:00, Darren Albers wrote:
> > I should say that I am using KDE rather than Gnome.
> > It seems that NetworkManager leans fairly heavily towards Gnome.
> > Maybe it is not a good choice for KDE users?
>
> Oops, I forgot that you are running KDE, I am not sure where
>
On 12/22/06, Timothy Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I read your FAQ, and deleted the entries in .gconf/system/networking/wireless/
> relating to the network I did not want to connect to.
> But this didn't appear to have the slightest effect;
> when I re-booted the deleted network still came
On Saturday 23 December 2006 00:42, Darren Albers wrote:
> > It always tries to connect to a network I very seldom use.
>
> Are both open network or is one WEP and the other open? I /think/
> that Network Manager will not automatically connect to an unencrypted
> network but I am not certain sinc
On 12/22/06, Timothy Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No.
> It always tries to connect to a network I very seldom use.
Are both open network or is one WEP and the other open? I /think/
that Network Manager will not automatically connect to an unencrypted
network but I am not certain since I
On Friday 22 December 2006 17:52, Darren Albers wrote:
> > 1) I have two WiFi networks in this house,
> > but I always use one of them, with ESSID dd-wrt.
> > I read somewhere that NM would work out which network
> > was usually used;
> > but in my case this does not seem to work -
> > NM always c
On 12/22/06, Timothy Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've recently gone over to NM,
> and it has solved a few problems for me,
> but it has brought a few new ones with it:
>
> 1) I have two WiFi networks in this house,
> but I always use one of them, with ESSID dd-wrt.
> I read somewhere that N
I've recently gone over to NM,
and it has solved a few problems for me,
but it has brought a few new ones with it:
1) I have two WiFi networks in this house,
but I always use one of them, with ESSID dd-wrt.
I read somewhere that NM would work out which network
was usually used;
but in my case this
32 matches
Mail list logo