>> Some additional information about this device, forgetting about the APP1
>> port issue...
>>
>> The MC8790 is really a Direct-IP capable device, but without DHCP.
>
> Interesting. Let's try to figure out how to support that. Maybe
> export the raw fwattr and let userspace figure it out inste
Aleksander Morgado writes:
> Some additional information about this device, forgetting about the APP1
> port issue...
>
> The MC8790 is really a Direct-IP capable device, but without DHCP.
Interesting. Let's try to figure out how to support that. Maybe
export the raw fwattr and let userspace f
On 04/04/2013 11:08 AM, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> On 04/03/2013 08:18 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 18:59 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
>>> On 03/04/2013 03:33 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 15:08 +0100, Gerald Richter - ECOS wrote:
> The following pa
On 04/03/2013 08:18 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 18:59 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
>> On 03/04/2013 03:33 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 15:08 +0100, Gerald Richter - ECOS wrote:
The following patch solves the problem for us. It works with all revisio
> >
> >
> > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > > Von: Aleksander Morgado [mailto:aleksan...@lanedo.com]
> > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. April 2013 19:00
> > > An: Dan Williams
> > > Cc: Gerald Richter; Marius Kotsbak; Harald Jung; networkman
k; Harald Jung; networkmanager-
> > l...@gnome.org
> > Betreff: Re: AW: Problems with Sierra MC 8790 with older firmware revision
> >
> > On 03/04/2013 03:33 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 15:08 +0100, Gerald Richter - ECOS wrote:
> > &g
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 18:59 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> On 03/04/2013 03:33 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 15:08 +0100, Gerald Richter - ECOS wrote:
> >> The following patch solves the problem for us. It works with all revisions
> >> we have available for testing
> >
> >
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. April 2013 19:00
> An: Dan Williams
> Cc: Gerald Richter; Marius Kotsbak; Harald Jung; networkmanager-
> l...@gnome.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: Problems with Sierra MC 8790 with older firmware revision
>
> On 03/04/2013 03:33 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Fri,
On 03/04/2013 03:33 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 15:08 +0100, Gerald Richter - ECOS wrote:
>> The following patch solves the problem for us. It works with all revisions
>> we have available for testing
>
> Pushed to git master and 0.6, thanks!
>
> Dan
>
>> Gerald
>>
>> --- mm
Montag, 25. Februar 2013 13:10
> > An: Dan Williams; Harald Jung
> > Cc: Marius Kotsbak; networkmanager-list@gnome.org
> > Betreff: AW: Problems with Sierra MC 8790 with older firmware revision
> >
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > we have now tested with two MC879
@gnome.org] Im Auftrag von Gerald Richter - ECOS
> Gesendet: Montag, 25. Februar 2013 13:10
> An: Dan Williams; Harald Jung
> Cc: Marius Kotsbak; networkmanager-list@gnome.org
> Betreff: AW: Problems with Sierra MC 8790 with older firmware revision
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> we have now t
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 16:42 +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> > On a side note, a user just reported an issue with a MC8790V (see the
> > trailing 'V' there), log attached. In this case, the issue is not about
> > using the APP1 port for PPP; the issue is that there is no non-APP port
> > shown, s
> On a side note, a user just reported an issue with a MC8790V (see the
> trailing 'V' there), log attached. In this case, the issue is not about
> using the APP1 port for PPP; the issue is that there is no non-APP port
> shown, so we don't specify any port being 'primary', and we end up
> choosin
(Resent with gzipped log)
>
> we have now tested with two MC8790 cards. One has work ever since with
> modem-manger, the other didn't (as Harald reported last week).
>
> From an usb point of view there is no difference (same product/vendor id
> etc.).
>
> The only difference is, that the card
Hi Dan,
we have now tested with two MC8790 cards. One has work ever since with
modem-manger, the other didn't (as Harald reported last week).
From an usb point of view there is no difference (same product/vendor id etc.).
The only difference is, that the card that isn't working reports Revision
15 matches
Mail list logo
