On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 10:02 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> > Again, if you can get dispatcher debugging that would be great.
> > Slaves
> > should never have IP information *unless it's been added externally
> > to
> > NM* by something, since they are slaves.
On Fri, Nov 13, Dan Williams wrote:
> Again, if you can get dispatcher debugging that would be great. Slaves
> should never have IP information *unless it's been added externally to
> NM* by something, since they are slaves.
I think the VPN route error happend with gsm. This week the reconnect
d
On Fri, 2015-11-13 at 21:38 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
>
> > If anyone believes anything important is missing it's a good time
> > to
> > speak up now.
>
> The interface for scripts in /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/ is in
> a
> poor state. IMO there are l
On Tue, Nov 03, poma wrote:
> Please bring the bridges back to network-manager-applet!
Thanks for finding this...
The current way of how things are broken is that even if a bridge is
active the GNOME GUI still wants to manage a "cabled connection". But
instead of actually doing that it tries to
On Mon, Nov 02, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> If anyone believes anything important is missing it's a good time to
> speak up now.
The interface for scripts in /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/ is in a
poor state. IMO there are likle two ways how third party apps interact
with NM: either they receive "
On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 18:02 +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> It's been some time since the work on NetworkManager 1.2 has begun. A
> lot of what's been planed has been implemented and we believe we
> should
> wrap up the work and do a major release.
>
> The wiki page with 1.2 fe
* Dan Williams
> I wouldn't get rid of "Automatic (Addresses only)" since this is what
> enables you to ignore DNS servers/routes and use your own.
Actually, contrary to to what you'd intuitively expect, that method
does *not* ignore receive routes. Only DNS servers are ignored. The
only differen
On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 07:53 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
> * Lubomir Rintel
>
> > If anyone believes anything important is missing it's a good time to
> > speak up now.
>
> A couple of suggestions:
>
> 1) IPv6 method cleanup:
>* Get rid of «Automatic (DHCP only)»
>* Get rid of «Automatic
* Lubomir Rintel
> If anyone believes anything important is missing it's a good time to
> speak up now.
A couple of suggestions:
1) IPv6 method cleanup:
* Get rid of «Automatic (DHCP only)»
* Get rid of «Automatic (Addresses only)»
* Replace «Ignore» with «Disabled», which should set t
On 02.11.2015 18:02, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> It's been some time since the work on NetworkManager 1.2 has begun. A
> lot of what's been planed has been implemented and we believe we should
> wrap up the work and do a major release.
>
> The wiki page with 1.2 feature page has b
Hello everyone,
It's been some time since the work on NetworkManager 1.2 has begun. A
lot of what's been planed has been implemented and we believe we should
wrap up the work and do a major release.
The wiki page with 1.2 feature page has been updated with the features
we're like to see in the re
11 matches
Mail list logo