Re: Bearers in mixed CDMA+LTE modems

2012-02-25 Thread Dan Williams
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 11:12 -0600, Dan Williams wrote: > On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 11:26 +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > > >>> I believe we need a MMBearerType enum in the 0.6 API, so that we can > > >>> tell in CreateBearer() whether we want a 3GPP or CDMA (well, or > > >>> POTS) > > >

Re: Bearers in mixed CDMA+LTE modems

2012-01-19 Thread Dan Williams
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 11:26 +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > >>> I believe we need a MMBearerType enum in the 0.6 API, so that we can > >>> tell in CreateBearer() whether we want a 3GPP or CDMA (well, or POTS) > >>> bearer. This property would be redundant for 3GPP-only, CDMA-only or

Re: Bearers in mixed CDMA+LTE modems

2012-01-17 Thread Aleksander Morgado
>>> I believe we need a MMBearerType enum in the 0.6 API, so that we can >>> tell in CreateBearer() whether we want a 3GPP or CDMA (well, or POTS) >>> bearer. This property would be redundant for 3GPP-only, CDMA-only or >>> POTS-only modems, but would be mandatory if we have a mixe

Re: Bearers in mixed CDMA+LTE modems

2012-01-17 Thread Marcel Holtmann
Hi Aleksander, > > I believe we need a MMBearerType enum in the 0.6 API, so that we can > > tell in CreateBearer() whether we want a 3GPP or CDMA (well, or POTS) > > bearer. This property would be redundant for 3GPP-only, CDMA-only or > > POTS-only modems, but would be mandatory if

Re: Bearers in mixed CDMA+LTE modems

2012-01-17 Thread Aleksander Morgado
>> I believe we need a MMBearerType enum in the 0.6 API, so that we can >> tell in CreateBearer() whether we want a 3GPP or CDMA (well, or POTS) >> bearer. This property would be redundant for 3GPP-only, CDMA-only or >> POTS-only modems, but would be mandatory if we have a mixed >>

Re: Bearers in mixed CDMA+LTE modems

2012-01-17 Thread Aleksander Morgado
> I believe we need a MMBearerType enum in the 0.6 API, so that we can > tell in CreateBearer() whether we want a 3GPP or CDMA (well, or POTS) > bearer. This property would be redundant for 3GPP-only, CDMA-only or > POTS-only modems, but would be mandatory if we have a mixed >

Re: Bearers in mixed CDMA+LTE modems

2012-01-16 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 16:19 -0600, Dan Williams wrote: > On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 11:58 +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > > Hi Aleksander, > > > > > >> I believe we need a MMBearerType enum in the 0.6 API, so that we can > > > >> tell in CreateBearer() whether we want a 3GPP or CDMA (well, or POTS) > >

Re: Bearers in mixed CDMA+LTE modems

2012-01-16 Thread Dan Williams
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 12:34 +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > Hey Marcel, > > > > I believe we need a MMBearerType enum in the 0.6 API, so that we can > tell in CreateBearer() whether we want a 3GPP or CDMA (well, or POTS) > bearer. This property would be redundant for 3GPP-only,

Re: Bearers in mixed CDMA+LTE modems

2012-01-16 Thread Dan Williams
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 11:58 +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Hi Aleksander, > > > >> I believe we need a MMBearerType enum in the 0.6 API, so that we can > > >> tell in CreateBearer() whether we want a 3GPP or CDMA (well, or POTS) > > >> bearer. This property would be redundant for 3GPP-only, CDMA-

Re: Bearers in mixed CDMA+LTE modems

2012-01-13 Thread Aleksander Morgado
Hey Marcel, > I believe we need a MMBearerType enum in the 0.6 API, so that we can tell in CreateBearer() whether we want a 3GPP or CDMA (well, or POTS) bearer. This property would be redundant for 3GPP-only, CDMA-only or POTS-only modems, but would be mandatory if we have a m

Re: Bearers in mixed CDMA+LTE modems

2012-01-13 Thread Marcel Holtmann
Hi Aleksander, > >> I believe we need a MMBearerType enum in the 0.6 API, so that we can > >> tell in CreateBearer() whether we want a 3GPP or CDMA (well, or POTS) > >> bearer. This property would be redundant for 3GPP-only, CDMA-only or > >> POTS-only modems, but would be mandatory if we have a m

Re: Bearers in mixed CDMA+LTE modems

2012-01-13 Thread Aleksander Morgado
>> I believe we need a MMBearerType enum in the 0.6 API, so that we can >> tell in CreateBearer() whether we want a 3GPP or CDMA (well, or POTS) >> bearer. This property would be redundant for 3GPP-only, CDMA-only or >> POTS-only modems, but would be mandatory if we have a mixed >> 3GPP(LTE)+CDMA

Re: Bearers in mixed CDMA+LTE modems

2012-01-12 Thread Dan Williams
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 17:29 +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > Hey, > > I believe we need a MMBearerType enum in the 0.6 API, so that we can > tell in CreateBearer() whether we want a 3GPP or CDMA (well, or POTS) > bearer. This property would be redundant for 3GPP-only, CDMA-only or > POTS-only mo

Bearers in mixed CDMA+LTE modems

2012-01-11 Thread Aleksander Morgado
Hey, I believe we need a MMBearerType enum in the 0.6 API, so that we can tell in CreateBearer() whether we want a 3GPP or CDMA (well, or POTS) bearer. This property would be redundant for 3GPP-only, CDMA-only or POTS-only modems, but would be mandatory if we have a mixed 3GPP(LTE)+CDMA bearer. Th