gt; correctly with the parameters "ppp0 up". However when disconnecting, the
> > dispatcher script is called with the parameters "eth0 down". It has been
> > like that for quite some time now, but only recently has it started to
> > annoy me enough to investigate.
&g
, the
> dispatcher script is called with the parameters "eth0 down". It has been
> like that for quite some time now, but only recently has it started to
> annoy me enough to investigate.
>
> Is that worth a bug report?
Hm, I just realized NM actually "takes down&q
0 down". It has been like that for
quite some time now, but only recently has it started to annoy me enough to
investigate.
Is that worth a bug report?
___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.
On Mar 18, 2010, at 20:49, Dan Williams wrote:
>> Is that the intended behaviour? To me, autoconnect indicates that it's
>
> Yes.
>
>> to be automatically connected unless I tell it otherwise, which is what
>> deactivateConnection() would logically do.
>
> You're probably looking for the Disco
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 15:35 -0400, Pat Suwalski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm playing with NetworkManager 0.80, specifically the (new) autoconnect
> feature.
>
> I've found that if autoconnect is set to true on a Connection, the
> backend runs GetSettings() on all of the Connections that have
> auto
Hello,
I'm playing with NetworkManager 0.80, specifically the (new) autoconnect
feature.
I've found that if autoconnect is set to true on a Connection, the
backend runs GetSettings() on all of the Connections that have
autoconnect set and brings them up. This appears correct.
However, if I
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 00:06 +0100, Gonsolo wrote:
> Am 01/27/2010 11:43 PM, schrieb Dan Williams:
> > On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 21:16 +0100, Gonsolo wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> I encountered another Network Manager bug with connection sharing.
> >>
> &
Am 01/27/2010 11:43 PM, schrieb Dan Williams:
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 21:16 +0100, Gonsolo wrote:
Hi!
I encountered another Network Manager bug with connection sharing.
After I shared my UMTS connection via WLAN and suspended my notebook, I
can't find my WLAN connection again. Instead,
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 21:16 +0100, Gonsolo wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I encountered another Network Manager bug with connection sharing.
>
> After I shared my UMTS connection via WLAN and suspended my notebook, I
> can't find my WLAN connection again. Instead, a new unreadable net
Hi!
I encountered another Network Manager bug with connection sharing.
After I shared my UMTS connection via WLAN and suspended my notebook, I
can't find my WLAN connection again. Instead, a new unreadable network
can be seen. It seems like a internationalization or Unicode problem.
, 2010-01-26 at 17:43 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 16:31 -0500, Tony Espy wrote:
> > Dan Williams wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 15:44 -0500, Tom Sutherland wrote:
> > >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/352228
> >
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 16:31 -0500, Tony Espy wrote:
> Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 15:44 -0500, Tom Sutherland wrote:
> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/352228
> >>
> >> Wireless gets disconnected every so often and it ap
Dan Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 15:44 -0500, Tom Sutherland wrote:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/352228
Wireless gets disconnected every so often and it appears the only
workaround is to do a "sudo restart network-manager"
It makes sense that this i
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 15:44 -0500, Tom Sutherland wrote:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/352228
>
> Wireless gets disconnected every so often and it appears the only
> workaround is to do a "sudo restart network-manager"
>
> It makes sense th
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/352228
Wireless gets disconnected every so often and it appears the only
workaround is to do a "sudo restart network-manager"
It makes sense that this is a crappy firmware/driver issues with
specific Intel cards, but is it possib
Massimiliano,
As Pietro mentioned,
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Pietro Battiston wrote:
>
> (not really "daily", but frequently updated), patch it, build it and
> install it. If something goes wrong, just reinstall the original
> packages for your distribution (of which you will have kept a
g those a
> link to a fix to modem-manager that should solve my problem:
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/ModemManager/ModemManager/commit/?id=2fc0c039e65173123a39a0fb6c8f44804cbd773a
>
> I've already filled a bug report on Launchpad
> (https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506620) b
demManager/ModemManager/commit/?id=2fc0c039e65173123a39a0fb6c8f44804cbd773a
I've already filled a bug report on Launchpad
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506620) but I guess it'll take a lot
of time to have a fix.
I downloaded the
ModemManager-2fc0c039e65173123a39a0fb6c8f44804cbd773a.tar.bz2
nager stop
>>> that the interfaces started by NetworkManager are not always stopped.
>>>
>>> Note: this is a F12 qemu-kvm guest with multiple (two) NICs defined.
>>>
>>> Bug or "feature"??
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Feature. It
) NICs defined.
Bug or "feature"??
Feature. It allows you to do 'service NetworkManager restart' and have
the connection survive. This is implemented for wired static and DHCP
interfaces only and was requested quite a few times by people who run
headless servers where yo
Manager stop
> > > that the interfaces started by NetworkManager are not always stopped.
> > >
> > > Note: this is a F12 qemu-kvm guest with multiple (two) NICs defined.
> > >
> > > Bug or "feature"??
> >
> > Feature. It allows you to
stopped.
> >
> > Note: this is a F12 qemu-kvm guest with multiple (two) NICs defined.
> >
> > Bug or "feature"??
>
> Feature. It allows you to do 'service NetworkManager restart' and have
> the connection survive. This is implemented for wire
o) NICs defined.
>
> Bug or "feature"??
Feature. It allows you to do 'service NetworkManager restart' and have
the connection survive. This is implemented for wired static and DHCP
interfaces only and was requested quite a few times by people who run
headless servers where
I notice that if I stop the NetworkManager service:
/etc/init.d/NetworkManager stop
that the interfaces started by NetworkManager are not always stopped.
Note: this is a F12 qemu-kvm guest with multiple (two) NICs defined.
Bug or "feature&quo
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 14:39 -0400, francois mazerolle wrote:
> Hi !
>
>
> I'm under Ubuntu 9.04 and using Network Manager to manage my wireless
> connexions.
>
> The problem is that , at home, my router doesn't broadcast his SSID.
> Let me explain the situation.
>
> This morning, I'm at home, c
Hi !
I'm under Ubuntu 9.04 and using Network Manager to manage my wireless
connexions.
The problem is that , at home, my router doesn't broadcast his SSID. Let me
explain the situation.
This morning, I'm at home, connected on my HOME network with the SSID not
broadcasted.
I close the cover of m
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 15:52 +0300, Tambet Ingo wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 05:05, zign wrote:
> > Hi, I think I got a bug in network-manager 7.0.100 and 7.1 when
> > connecting to eap-tls wireless network with a CA chain.
> >
> > I found that the Network-manager only
Hi, I think I got a bug in network-manager 7.0.100 and 7.1 when
connecting to eap-tls wireless network with a CA chain.
I found that the Network-manager only pass the the first CA cert to the
wpa_supplicant if you have more than one CA cert in the file, which may result
in the connection
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 05:05, zign wrote:
> Hi, I think I got a bug in network-manager 7.0.100 and 7.1 when
> connecting to eap-tls wireless network with a CA chain.
>
> I found that the Network-manager only pass the the first CA cert to the
> wpa_supplicant if you have more than
Hi, I think I got a bug in network-manager 7.0.100 and 7.1 when
connecting to eap-tls wireless network with a CA chain.
I found that the Network-manager only pass the the first CA cert to the
wpa_supplicant if you have more than one CA cert in the file, which may
result in the connection failure
Hi,
I have been testing blueman and network-manager under Ubuntu Intrepid.
Blueman is set to integrate with NM.
NM: 0.7.0 (svn 20081018t105859)
Blueman: 1.10
In all the years I have used GNU/Linux (since 97) I have never managed to
use a GUI application to create a bluetooth connection to the int
2009/5/21 Dan Williams
> On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 09:15 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
> >
> >
> > 2009/5/21 Dan Williams
> > On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 10:23 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > &
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 09:15 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
>
>
> 2009/5/21 Dan Williams
> On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 10:23 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've just been bitten by a small bug in
2009/5/21 Dan Williams
> On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 10:23 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've just been bitten by a small bug in src/nm-gsm-device.c +443:
> >
> > const char *responses[] = { "+CREG: 0,0", "+CREG: 0,1
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 10:23 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just been bitten by a small bug in src/nm-gsm-device.c +443:
>
> const char *responses[] = { "+CREG: 0,0", "+CREG: 0,1", "+CREG: 0,2",
> "+CREG: 0,3",
Hi all,
I've just been bitten by a small bug in src/nm-gsm-device.c +443:
const char *responses[] = { "+CREG: 0,0", "+CREG: 0,1", "+CREG: 0,2",
"+CREG: 0,3", "+CREG: 0,5", NULL };
If an external implementation has send '+CREG=1'
n a new ticket in GNOME Bugzilla?
There's already a bug open for it.
dan
___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 10:23 +0100, Brian Morrison wrote:
> Paul Menzel wrote:
> > Dear NetworkManager hackers,
> >
> >
> > somehow the PIN for my SIM card was locked and the dialog popped up to
> > enter the PUK code. (But the field said PIN: .)
> >
> > $ grep -i puk /var/log/daemon.log
> >
Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear NetworkManager hackers,
>
>
> somehow the PIN for my SIM card was locked and the dialog popped up to
> enter the PUK code. (But the field said PIN: .)
>
> $ grep -i puk /var/log/daemon.log
> xxx NetworkManager: (ttyHS0): GSM puk secret required
>
> The PUK code i
could enter four. The
workaround was to put the SIM into a mobile phone and unlock it there.
This has been already reported [1][2][3][4]. Is that a known problem and
should I open a new ticket in GNOME Bugzilla?
Thanks,
Paul
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/network-manager-applet/+bug/318265
[2
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 15:28 -0700, Russell Suter wrote:
> All,
>
> Apologies up front if this isn't proper procedure for submitting a
> patch, but I'm still new.
No problem; you've hit the correct procedure on the first try :)
> There is a slight annoyance/bug in
All,
Apologies up front if this isn't proper procedure for submitting a
patch, but I'm still new.
There is a slight annoyance/bug in the advanced page of the pptp setup
page. If one selects MPPE and chooses 128 bit, the next time they come
into the screen, the MPPE check box
Thanks.. I hadn't svn updated in the last several days.
-Original Message-
From: Tambet Ingo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 8/15/2008 10:17 AM
To: Miner, Jonathan W (US SSA)
Cc: NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: bug in resolv.conf rewrite
On Fri, A
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Miner, Jonathan W (US SSA)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I may have found a bug in the resolv.conf rewriting code. Here is the
> scenario that caused this:
>
> 1) Booted up with wireless network, ISP #1. I didn't verify, but the file
I may have found a bug in the resolv.conf rewriting code. Here is the scenario
that caused this:
1) Booted up with wireless network, ISP #1. I didn't verify, but the file
should have contained:
nameserver A.B.C.35
nameserver A.B.C.36
2) Connected to physical ethernet, ISP #2. The con
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-04-19 at 23:56 +, Stefán Freyr Stefánsson wrote:
>> Hi again.
>>
>> It seems that my previous bug report was invalid. I have already closed the
>> bug and added a comment explaining
On Sat, 2008-04-19 at 23:56 +, Stefán Freyr Stefánsson wrote:
> Hi again.
>
> It seems that my previous bug report was invalid. I have already closed the
> bug and added a comment explaining it.
>
> I had missed one combination when trying to connect to the wireless
Stefán Freyr Stefánsson wrote:
> Hi again.
>
> It seems that my previous bug report was invalid. I have already closed the
> bug and added a comment explaining it.
>
> I had missed one combination when trying to connect to the wireless network,
> namely selecting &
Hi again.
It seems that my previous bug report was invalid. I have already closed the
bug and added a comment explaining it.
I had missed one combination when trying to connect to the wireless network,
namely selecting "Open System" and "WEP Passphrase". Using that combina
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 16:13 +0100, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 08:16 +0100, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> >
> >> NetworkManagerDispatcher dispatches dbus signals to more traditional
> >> if-up.d style scripts. Unfortunately it doesn't work when the device is
> >>
Dan Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 08:16 +0100, Alan Jenkins wrote:
NetworkManagerDispatcher dispatches dbus signals to more traditional
if-up.d style scripts. Unfortunately it doesn't work when the device is
removed. It needs to look up the real interface name e.g. eth0, by
calling
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 08:16 +0100, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> NetworkManagerDispatcher dispatches dbus signals to more traditional
> if-up.d style scripts. Unfortunately it doesn't work when the device is
> removed. It needs to look up the real interface name e.g. eth0, by
> calling a method on the db
NetworkManagerDispatcher dispatches dbus signals to more traditional
if-up.d style scripts. Unfortunately it doesn't work when the device is
removed. It needs to look up the real interface name e.g. eth0, by
calling a method on the dbus device object but the object has already
been deleted by the
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 17:39 +0800, charlyliu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was trying to use the pppoe features. I create a connection in gconf. But I
> don't really know what it should have. Now I only put the directory ppp,
> copying the settings of a vpn connection, the directory pppoe with the
> u
Hi all,
I was trying to use the pppoe features. I create a connection in gconf. But I
don't really know what it should have. Now I only put the directory ppp,
copying the settings of a vpn connection, the directory pppoe with the
username, password and service key and the directory connection w
re is a fix?
> 3.How can i used it without trouble?
Sounds like a bug; could you attach to the NetworkManager process with GDB and
get a backtrace from NM when it fails to respond to further D-Bus commands?
Also, logs from NetworkManager (either run it manually with --no-daemon or grab
Hello,
I have worked with the network manager for 2 months. I have wrote a small
programm in Ruby which communicate over DBus with the network manager. I used
the signals.
Unfortunately, the networkmanager didn't like my programm and usually it has
stopped to update the gui and has taken no D
Eddie Armstrong wrote:
> Can anyone tell me why other users (other than primary user) cannot log
> onto the internet using knetworkmanager?
Thanks for your help and for all the polite replies
___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@g
Can anyone tell me why other users (other than primary user) cannot log
onto the internet using knetworkmanager? I have to log in and start
knetworkmanager and then switch users before they can access the
internet through knetworkmanager
Or am I in the wrong place?
TIA
Eddie
___
On Jan 14, 2008 4:28 AM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 11:07 +0100, Wander Winkelhorst wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I think I've found a bug in NM 0.6.5 where it marks AP's as invalid
> > too agressivly. I've hacked arou
On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 11:07 +0100, Wander Winkelhorst wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I think I've found a bug in NM 0.6.5 where it marks AP's as invalid
> too agressivly. I've hacked around it and then I'd thought I'd check
> out SVN. The bug doesn't seem to be in
I reported this against gnome-icon-theme:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509199
Rui
___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
on theme and those are only if the icon theme does not
> > specify replacements for the Stock Icons. I tested this on my Ubuntu
> > 7.10 system running NM 0.7 and this was how it behaved.
> >
>
> I'd be insterested to see which icons you're talking about.
> Th
this on my Ubuntu
> 7.10 system running NM 0.7 and this was how it behaved.
>
I'd be insterested to see which icons you're talking about.
The icons I attached in the bug are specific to nm-applet, thus they
are not provided by gnome-icon-theme, these icons are for the
animations (Det
Hi!
I think I've found a bug in NM 0.6.5 where it marks AP's as invalid too
agressivly. I've hacked around it and then I'd thought I'd check out SVN.
The bug doesn't seem to be in the SVN version; the whole structure of the
file is different.
So when is version 0
that would be great they use the same style. GNOME
> > > default theme switched to Tango style in version 2.20 (I'm talking
> > > Tango as the style, not the Tango the icon theme) that's why I wanted
> > > to replace the icons with the set attached on the bug repo
on 2.20 (I'm talking
> > Tango as the style, not the Tango the icon theme) that's why I wanted
> > to replace the icons with the set attached on the bug report.
> > They fit nicely with the current GNOME desktop
> >
> > Thank you
>
> So as nobody r
at stock icons should inherit from icon theme, but for
> specific icons, that would be great they use the same style. GNOME
> default theme switched to Tango style in version 2.20 (I'm talking
> Tango as the style, not the Tango the icon theme) that's why I wanted
> to replace t
heme switched to Tango style in version 2.20 (I'm talking
Tango as the style, not the Tango the icon theme) that's why I wanted
to replace the icons with the set attached on the bug report.
They fit nicely with the current GNOME desktop
Thank you
--
Baptiste Mille-Mat
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 19:40 -0500, Darren Albers wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2008 8:57 AM, Baptiste Mille-Mathias
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello gents and Happy New Year,
> >
> > I wanted to bring your attention on bug 504822 in order to have
> > beautiful t
On Jan 4, 2008 8:57 AM, Baptiste Mille-Mathias
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello gents and Happy New Year,
>
> I wanted to bring your attention on bug 504822 in order to have
> beautiful tango icons for the NM-applet.
> It could be fantastic to have these before the UI Free
Hello gents and Happy New Year,
I wanted to bring your attention on bug 504822 in order to have
beautiful tango icons for the NM-applet.
It could be fantastic to have these before the UI Freeze; as NM-applet
is one of the latest application not using tango icons.
thank you
--
Baptiste Mille
> card.
>
> Dan
>
>
> > >
> > > Dan
> > >
> > >
> > > > Much thanks,
> > > > Ohad.
> > > >
> > > > On Dec 25, 2007 12:57 AM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > O
> >
> > > Much thanks,
> > > Ohad.
> > >
> > > On Dec 25, 2007 12:57 AM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 10:55 +0200, Ohad Lutzky wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> &
had.
> > >
> > > On Dec 25, 2007 12:57 AM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 10:55 +0200, Ohad Lutzky wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > Apparently it's not a WPA issue after all. Please chec
etc. It's just another
example of drivers being inconsistent.
Dan
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> > > Much thanks,
> > > Ohad.
> > >
> > > On Dec 25, 2007 12:57 AM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 20
downstream (Debian, Ubuntu) for the time
being?
>
> Dan
>
>
> > Much thanks,
> > Ohad.
> >
> > On Dec 25, 2007 12:57 AM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 10:55 +0200, Ohad Lutzky wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 10:55 +0200, Ohad Lutzky wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Apparently it's not a WPA issue after all. Please check patch attached here:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/112009/comments/12
Contrary to the bug report, it's _
Hi all,
Apparently it's not a WPA issue after all. Please check patch attached here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/112009/comments/12
--
Man is the only animal that laughs and weeps, for he is the only
animal that is struck with the difference between
On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 00:31 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The problem here is that the card is powered down during suspend or
> > hibernate. When the card is down, it looses the association, and you
> > have to go back through the entire connection process anyway, just get
> > association, a
> The problem here is that the card is powered down during suspend or
> hibernate. When the card is down, it looses the association, and you
> have to go back through the entire connection process anyway, just get
> association, authenticate, and get an address back.
Ha, that's not true on my lap
ormation is wrong. But I am still
> confused by the logs: after the line "Activation (eth0): cancelled",
> dhclient is still running. Is that expected ? NM announces it is giving
> up but goes on trying just in case ? And this dhclient is still running
> while NM is connecting thr
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 07:19:05AM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> NM ignores link changes during device activation. This is for a number
> of reasons. The first is driver variance, and because during the
> activation, the device may bounce up and down due to dhclient starting
> up, or whatever. Dr
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 12:35 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 10:54:49AM +, Rui Tiago Matos wrote:
> > On 11/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > That would help if libsmbios is present but the driver is not loaded. The
> > > problem here is that libs
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 10:54:49AM +, Rui Tiago Matos wrote:
> On 11/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That would help if libsmbios is present but the driver is not loaded. The
> > problem here is that libsmbios was not installed (I had never heard of
> > it, and it is not
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 11:39 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 05:10:24PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > That's a Fedora 7, with a knetworkmanager from svn20070815, while the bug
> > > has been fixed (I think) on 20070827:
> > > 200
On 11/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That would help if libsmbios is present but the driver is not loaded. The
> problem here is that libsmbios was not installed (I had never heard of
> it, and it is not installed by default). In that case, the error message
> gives no useful
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 05:10:24PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> > That's a Fedora 7, with a knetworkmanager from svn20070815, while the bug
> > has been fixed (I think) on 20070827:
> > 2007-08-27 07:30 Helmut Schaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * src/
ora
> > > didn't push an update to fix that annoying bug.
> >
> > Which Fedora version? F7 or F8?
>
> That's a Fedora 7, with a knetworkmanager from svn20070815, while the bug
> has been fixed (I think) on 20070827:
> 2007-08-27 07:30 Helmut
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 04:16:16PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Your message motivated me to try to compile knetworkmanager from svn. As
> > you predicted, it solved my problem. Thanks a lot ! I wonder why fedora
> > didn't push an update to fix that annoying bug.
>
&
kely fixed in KNM 0.2.1.
>
> Hi !
>
> Your message motivated me to try to compile knetworkmanager from svn. As
> you predicted, it solved my problem. Thanks a lot ! I wonder why fedora
> didn't push an update to fix that annoying bug.
Which Fedora version? F7 or F8?
>
oximatively, every 6 seconds.
>
> KNM 0.2.1 is not yet officially released.
> Your connection-problem will be most likely fixed in KNM 0.2.1.
Hi !
Your message motivated me to try to compile knetworkmanager from svn. As
you predicted, it solved my problem. Thanks a lot ! I wonder why fedor
Hi Eric,
Am Donnerstag, 1. November 2007 11:16:12 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hi,
>
> On my laptop, when I boot and login, I have no connection.
>
> I click on knetworkmanager's icon to select my wifi access point, I have
> the progress bar going up to 100% and the "signal strength" staircase
> i
Hi,
On my laptop, when I boot and login, I have no connection.
I click on knetworkmanager's icon to select my wifi access point, I have
the progress bar going up to 100% and the "signal strength" staircase
icon appears. Looks good, but I don't actually have a connexion: after 4
or 5 seconds the
ets
itself and decides on what seems to it as the best network, which means
switching back to managed mode. We haven't found any combination of actions
which allows us to work around the no-channel bug when using networkmanager,
leaving manual usage of iwconfig as the only way to create a wire
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 16:34 +0300, Ohad Lutzky wrote:
> Here's a bug I've reported under Ubuntu (I can't find a bugzilla in
> which to report it upstream):
>
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sour
On 8/15/07, Ohad Lutzky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Here's a bug I've reported under Ubuntu (I can't find a bugzilla in which to
> report it upstream):
>
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/112009
>
> -
Here's a bug I've reported under Ubuntu (I can't find a bugzilla in which to
report it upstream):
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/112009
-
I'm trying to use NetworkManager to create an ad
a computer with just one source of Internet has that turned off
by NM it is a serious Bug I think. Your better at reading the messages
and perhaps you can find a reason I missed.
Karl
___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnom
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 01:01 +0530, Ritesh Khadgaray wrote:
> If i use a pcmcia or a usb wireless card, plugging the same adds
> wireless option and unplugging the cards removes the wireless option.
>
> With rfkill switch on my dell d620 set to enable removes wireless card
> from hal listing but no
101 - 200 of 282 matches
Mail list logo
