Am 01/27/2010 11:44 PM, schrieb Dan Williams:
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 21:02 +0100, Gonsolo wrote:
I have a working UMTS connection via a option.ko based stick and a
working connection sharing via WIFI (iwlagn on the UMTS notebook and
ath5k on the other notebook).
I try to copy the linux source
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 00:06 +0100, Gonsolo wrote:
> Am 01/27/2010 11:43 PM, schrieb Dan Williams:
> > On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 21:16 +0100, Gonsolo wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> I encountered another Network Manager bug with connection sharing.
> >>
> &
Am 01/27/2010 11:43 PM, schrieb Dan Williams:
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 21:16 +0100, Gonsolo wrote:
Hi!
I encountered another Network Manager bug with connection sharing.
After I shared my UMTS connection via WLAN and suspended my notebook, I
can't find my WLAN connection again. Instead,
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 21:02 +0100, Gonsolo wrote:
> > I have a working UMTS connection via a option.ko based stick and a
> > working connection sharing via WIFI (iwlagn on the UMTS notebook and
> > ath5k on the other notebook).
> >
> > I try to copy the linux source v
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 21:16 +0100, Gonsolo wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I encountered another Network Manager bug with connection sharing.
>
> After I shared my UMTS connection via WLAN and suspended my notebook, I
> can't find my WLAN connection again. Instead, a new unreadable net
Hi!
I encountered another Network Manager bug with connection sharing.
After I shared my UMTS connection via WLAN and suspended my notebook, I
can't find my WLAN connection again. Instead, a new unreadable network
can be seen. It seems like a internationalization or Unicode problem.
I have a working UMTS connection via a option.ko based stick and a
working connection sharing via WIFI (iwlagn on the UMTS notebook and
ath5k on the other notebook).
I try to copy the linux source via scp from my old notebook to the new
(UMTS) one and it is horribly slow.
Is that problem known
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 17:24 +, Marc Herbert wrote:
> Gonsolo a écrit :
> >
> > I have a working UMTS connection via a option.ko based stick and a
> > working connection sharing via WIFI (iwlagn on the UMTS notebook and
> > ath5k on the other notebook).
>
Gonsolo a écrit :
>
> I have a working UMTS connection via a option.ko based stick and a
> working connection sharing via WIFI (iwlagn on the UMTS notebook and
> ath5k on the other notebook).
>
> I try to copy the linux source via scp from my old notebook to the new
>
Hi!
I have a working UMTS connection via a option.ko based stick and a
working connection sharing via WIFI (iwlagn on the UMTS notebook and
ath5k on the other notebook).
I try to copy the linux source via scp from my old notebook to the new
(UMTS) one and it is horribly slow.
Is that
What type of wifi card? It may be that driver issues prevent the wifi
card from completing the WPA Ad-Hoc network. WPA Ad-Hoc is more complex
than WEP ad-hoc and there have been kernel driver issues with that
configuration in the past. What kernel version are you using, what wifi
hardware, an
> broadband via NetworkManager and then create a new WLAN network also via
> NetworkManager like it is explained in
> http://magazine.redhat.com/2008/10/16/video-fedora-10-connection-sharing/ .
> It automatically adds DNS forwarding via dnsmasq (,I guess).
>
> And, how I said, it wo
On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 18:58 +0200, Quintin Beukes wrote:
> The type of encryption shouldn't make a difference to sharing ability.
> It's 2 completely differently networking layers.
Actually it does; you can't connect to a WPA2-only Ad-Hoc network with
the current wpa_supplicant and Linux kernel dr
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Quintin Beukes wrote:
> > It should not have to be ad-hoc. The wifi card is acting in ap(Access
> > Point) mode.
>
> How does this work?
>
Internally or how to configure?
To configure:
1. Create a new wireless connection with the add button
2. enter ssid
3. Kee
2010/1/18 Marc Herbert :
> Gonsolo a écrit :
>> I think my WG511 card would allow WPA
>
> Note that it is not because a card works as a WPA station that it works
> as an WPA Access Point.
>
I agree.
I remember that when I was testing a rt61-based card, I had problems
when tried to use WPA with a
Gonsolo a écrit :
> I think my WG511 card would allow WPA
Note that it is not because a card works as a WPA station that it works
as an WPA Access Point.
___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/l
> It should not have to be ad-hoc. The wifi card is acting in ap(Access
> Point) mode.
How does this work?
Q
___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
Am 17.01.2010 22:09, schrieb John Mahoney:
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Quintin Beukes wrote:
Are you sure the network is even established? Can you ping the other host?
You mentioned "ad-hoc". I've noticed NetworkManager has problems
establishing AdHoc networks using WPA. For the network
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Quintin Beukes wrote:
> Are you sure the network is even established? Can you ping the other host?
>
> You mentioned "ad-hoc". I've noticed NetworkManager has problems
> establishing AdHoc networks using WPA. For the network doesn't
> establish in the first place,
Are you sure the network is even established? Can you ping the other host?
You mentioned "ad-hoc". I've noticed NetworkManager has problems
establishing AdHoc networks using WPA. For the network doesn't
establish in the first place, so sharing won't work.
Maybe this is your problem as well?
try
Am 17.01.2010 18:04, schrieb Marc Luethi:
On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 17:37 +0100, Gonsolo wrote:
It works with WEP64 encryption but not with WPA/WPA2 encryption.
If your notebook sets up an "ad hoc" WiFi network, you can't use WPA or
WPA2.
AFAIK, the "ad hoc" WiFi mode is still limited to WEP enc
aring via a configuration option?
No, very simple: Plug in UMTS Stick and WLAN Pcmcia card, connect mobile
broadband via NetworkManager and then create a new WLAN network also via
NetworkManager like it is explained in
http://magazine.redhat.com/2008/10/16/video-fedora-10-connection-sharing/ .
The type of encryption shouldn't make a difference to sharing ability.
It's 2 completely differently networking layers.
Though, how are you sharing it? Are you building custom firewall
rules, or using some automated sharing via a configuration option?
Quintin Beukes
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 6:3
Hi!
I wanted to inform you that I was able to share my connection with WEP64
but not WPA/WPA2.
I am connecting my Ipod Touch 2nd generation to my notebook (ath5k based
WLAN card, Ubuntu Karmic) which is connected to the internet via UMTS
(Huawei E220, "option" kernel module).
It works with
> connection..."? Basically, I would like to be able to share any
> > > active internet connection to any other medium, wired or wireless or
> > > whatever.
> >
> > Would this help you?
> >
> > http://doctormo.wordpress.com/2009/12/06/ubuntus-inte
to any other medium, wired or wireless or
> > whatever.
>
> Would this help you?
>
> http://doctormo.wordpress.com/2009/12/06/ubuntus-internet-connection-sharing/
Yes, thank you. Why wasn't this feature touted and advertized as much
as Wireless network sharing w
ot;Create new wireless network..." dialog generic like "Share network
> connection..."? Basically, I would like to be able to share any
> active internet connection to any other medium, wired or wireless or
> whatever.
Would this help you?
http://doctormo.wordpress.com/
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 11:31:29AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 19:24 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> > Looking at a video Dan Williams posted to Redhat Magazine shows enabling
> > it is now as simple as creating the new connection in ad-hoc mode with ipv4
> > settings as 'av
n't have a dhcp server installed, but I do have dnsmasq installed.
Yes, NM will do all these things. dnsmasq is both a caching DNS server
and a lightweight DHCP server. So NM just uses it for both functions.
> I have a wired connection that has internet access through a firewall behind
&
computers, and they will get IP addresses via DHCP from your machine.
Dan,
Just to clarify, does nm actually instantiate a dhcp server, and create the
subnet etc?
I don't have a dhcp server installed, but I do have dnsmasq installed.
I have a wired connection that has internet access
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 19:24 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> Looking at a video Dan Williams posted to Redhat Magazine shows enabling
> it is now as simple as creating the new connection in ad-hoc mode with ipv4
> settings as 'available to other computers' but on my F12 system this doesn't
> start
On Sunday 06 December 2009 11:24:47 am Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> Looking at a video Dan Williams posted to Redhat Magazine shows enabling
> it is now as simple as creating the new connection in ad-hoc mode with ipv4
> settings as 'available to other computers' but on my F12 system this
> doesn't s
Looking at a video Dan Williams posted to Redhat Magazine shows enabling
it is now as simple as creating the new connection in ad-hoc mode with ipv4
settings as 'available to other computers' but on my F12 system this doesn't
start dnsmasq etc. Is it still required to set this all up manually or do
2009/11/17 Jud Craft
> > When doing that, in the IPv4 tab, choose the "Shared" IPv4 method.
> > Then, hook up your wired cable, and pick your new shared connection from
> > the menu. NM will now NAT the wired subnet to the current default
> > connection, which I assume would be your wifi. You c
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 01:18 +0100, Benoit Boissinot wrote:
> Forgot to hit reply all, sorry.
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Benoit Boissinot
> Date: Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:17 AM
> Subject: Re: Internet connection sharing
> To: Dan Williams
>
&
Forgot to hit reply all, sorry.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Benoit Boissinot
Date: Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:17 AM
Subject: Re: Internet connection sharing
To: Dan Williams
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 02:05 +0100, Ben
> When doing that, in the IPv4 tab, choose the "Shared" IPv4 method.
> Then, hook up your wired cable, and pick your new shared connection from
> the menu. NM will now NAT the wired subnet to the current default
> connection, which I assume would be your wifi. You can also share 3G ->
> wired thi
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 02:05 +0100, Benoit Boissinot wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Fernando Pereira
> wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply.
> > Hum... if it does NAT then how can users know about that? But actually, many
> > times I want to share the internet I get via wireless to my wired
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Fernando Pereira wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
> Hum... if it does NAT then how can users know about that? But actually, many
> times I want to share the internet I get via wireless to my wired
> connection. It acts the same way?
Yes you can create a shared wire
Thanks for the reply.
Hum... if it does NAT then how can users know about that? But actually, many
times I want to share the internet I get via wireless to my wired
connection. It acts the same way?
Cheers
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:19 PM, John Mahoney wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:19 P
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:19 PM, John Mahoney wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Fernando Pereira wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>> first of all this is my first post to this list. Cheers everybody!
>>
>> I'm just starting a telecom projects related so I'm using linux (ubuntu)
>> quite intensiv
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Fernando Pereira wrote:
> Hi there,
> first of all this is my first post to this list. Cheers everybody!
>
> I'm just starting a telecom projects related so I'm using linux (ubuntu)
> quite intensively.
> One thing that i'm doing all the time is to share the networ
Hi there,
first of all this is my first post to this list. Cheers everybody!
I'm just starting a telecom projects related so I'm using linux (ubuntu)
quite intensively.
One thing that i'm doing all the time is to share the network access with
NAT (you know... iptables, masquerading, ip forwarding.
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 12:01 +0100, Neill Rutherford wrote:
> This is a request for guidance. I am new to Linux.
>
> Internet -> Option ICON 225 -> HP 5271 Pavillon Laptop =>DLink 660
> PCMCIA Card. =>LinkSys Wrk54G
> (FireStarter
> with IC
This is a request for guidance. I am new to Linux.
Internet -> Option ICON 225 -> HP 5271 Pavillon Laptop =>DLink 660
PCMCIA Card. =>LinkSys Wrk54G
(FireStarter
with ICS) WAN
Accesspor
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 11:54 -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> Is there something special I need to do to support wireless security
> when sharing my network connection on my laptpop?
>
> On my ubuntu Thinkpad T61 running ath9k driver I can "Create New
> Wireless Network..." without any security
> and m
Is there something special I need to do to support wireless security when
sharing my network connection on my laptpop?
On my ubuntu Thinkpad T61 running ath9k driver I can "Create New Wireless
Network..." without any security
and my iPhone will connect to the laptop's wireless.
If I try and enabl
>That's because (a) drivers universally suck for master mode, and (b)
>there's a hell of a lot more setup required for master mode than adhoc.
>At the moment, I don't see a compelling reason to use master mode over
>adhoc until drivers get better.
er.. I didn't mean to complain about the "lack"
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 13:36 +, netzt...@bluewin.ch wrote:
> Hi all
>
> >> On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 09:30 +0900, Jacobs Shannon wrote:
> >> > I now realize that I
> >> > didn't do quite enough testing to pin it to the DNS, but
> >> > I'll check with an external IP address the
> >> > next time I
t; > dnsmasq-base (alone) is working properly for the
> > > > connection sharing. I've noticed a few minor behavioral
> > > > differences, but I think that's probably just
> > > > some differences in the security settings.
> > > >
>
Hi all
>> On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 09:30 +0900, Jacobs Shannon wrote:
>> > I now realize that I
>> > didn't do quite enough testing to pin it to the DNS, but
>> > I'll check with an external IP address the
>> > next time I see it...
I ran into a DNS-related problem with dnsmasq (once i had discove
> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 06:51:11 -0400
> From: Dan Williams
>
> On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 09:30 +0900, Jacobs Shannon wrote:
> > > Not sure what I did differently this last time, but
> > > dnsmasq-base (alone) is working properly for the
> > > conne
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 09:30 +0900, Jacobs Shannon wrote:
> > Not sure what I did differently this last time, but
> > dnsmasq-base (alone) is working properly for the
> > connection sharing. I've noticed a few minor behavioral
> > differences, but I think that's
> Not sure what I did differently this last time, but
> dnsmasq-base (alone) is working properly for the
> connection sharing. I've noticed a few minor behavioral
> differences, but I think that's probably just
> some differences in the security settings.
>
> The
Not sure what I did differently this last time, but dnsmasq-base
(alone) is working properly for the connection sharing. I've noticed
a few minor behavioral differences, but I think that's probably just
some differences in the security settings.
The other problems I mentioned are minor,
I tried connection sharing using a different WLAN adapter and with an
additional laptop which uses the shared connection.
I bought ZyXEL AG-220 WLAN adapter (ID 0586:3412) which uses zd1211rw driver. I
plugged it in to the same PC which has the WL54H card - because it is a PCI
card I did not
ers,
without sharing connection first ( try some file transfers, between the
two computers, wait a few minutes, restart a file transfer... ). if the
connection is rock stable, then you can suspect the connection sharing,
but I guess you
Hi!
On the ThinkPad I get an error message while my browser is downloading
something from Internet. In the tray in the lower right hand corner of the
Windows screen the Wireless icon gets a red cross. After a while the Wireless
icon changes when the ThinkPad gets a new IP address and then the
a lot of difficulties to
merge bssids.
I suggest you to test only the connection between your two computers,
without sharing connection first ( try some file transfers, between the
two computers, wait a few minutes, restart a file transfer... ). if the
connection is rock stable, then you c
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 17:48 +0200, Juhani Jaakola wrote:
> I have a PC with A-Link WL54H WLAN card (driver rt2500pci) and a USB 3G
> modem. I connect to the Internet via the 3G modem and I want to share that
> connection with other PCs via WLAN. I'm running Fedora 10.
>
> I connected to Internet
I have a PC with A-Link WL54H WLAN card (driver rt2500pci) and a USB 3G modem.
I connect to the Internet via the 3G modem and I want to share that connection
with other PCs via WLAN. I'm running Fedora 10.
I connected to Internet with "Auto GSM network connection". Then I chose "Create New
Wir
Dan Williams wrote:
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 16:18 +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Bill Moseley wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 05:19:33PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 21:12 -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
I'm running Ubuntu 8.10 on a Thinkpad T60p w/ Atheros wireless.
madwifi or a
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 16:18 +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Bill Moseley wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 05:19:33PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 21:12 -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> >>> I'm running Ubuntu 8.10 on a Thinkpad T60p w/ Atheros wireless.
> >> madwifi or ath5k?
Bill Moseley wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 05:19:33PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 21:12 -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
I'm running Ubuntu 8.10 on a Thinkpad T60p w/ Atheros wireless.
madwifi or ath5k? Only ath5k is supported, because madwifi isn't in the
upstream kernel. Ne
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 05:19:33PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 21:12 -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > I'm running Ubuntu 8.10 on a Thinkpad T60p w/ Atheros wireless.
>
> madwifi or ath5k? Only ath5k is supported, because madwifi isn't in the
> upstream kernel. NetworkManager
o made it look easy:
>
> http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/10/16/video-fedora-10-connection-sharing/
>
> But when I select "Create New Wireless Network..." from the nm-applet
> menu the applet just says I've connected to my existing wireless
> network. And with other computers
made it look easy:
>
> http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/10/16/video-fedora-10-connection-sharing/
>
> But when I select "Create New Wireless Network..." from the nm-applet
> menu the applet just says I've connected to my existing wireless
> network. And with other computers I do
I'm running Ubuntu 8.10 on a Thinkpad T60p w/ Atheros wireless.
Can someone point me to docs on sharing my connection with my
wireless card when I'm on my wired LAN?
This video made it look easy:
http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/10/16/video-fedora-10-connection-sharing/
But whe
On Sat, 2008-03-08 at 16:48 -0500, Darren Albers wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After some discussion in a related thread on fedora-devel, I've thought
> > through the WiFi connection shar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Darren Albers wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> After some discussion in a related thread on fedora-devel, I've thought
>> through the WiFi connection
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After some discussion in a related thread on fedora-devel, I've thought
> through the WiFi connection sharing a bit more, and been schooled on a
> few things.
>
> Mac OS X pro
Hi,
After some discussion in a related thread on fedora-devel, I've thought
through the WiFi connection sharing a bit more, and been schooled on a
few things.
Mac OS X provides a full infrastructure-mode network when sharing an
internet connection over wireless. It also provides DHCP to cl
On Sun, 2006-08-27 at 07:51 -0400, Saikat Guha wrote:
> Would NM be the appropriate place to have "connection sharing" that just
> works?
Quite appropriate. This has been planned for a while, and blocks on
multiple active devices, which in turn blocks on getting the last little
On Sun, 2006-08-27 at 20:35 -0400, Saikat Guha wrote:
> As for the restrictions themselves, I don't know whether NM is the
> best
> place to enforce firewalling of the internal network when it doesn't
> handle firewalling of the actual internet interface. IMHO, it makes
> more
> sense for NM to all
rewalling
needs) do the right thing for internal hosts.
That said, if this were to be implemented, the actual security
restrictions provided by NM are a secondary matter IMHO. Adding the
NAT'ing/connection-sharing functionality would be more valuable -- even
without enhanced security for the inte
> If ethX is internet-facing and ethY is to be NAT'ed, perhaps
> a rule at the very top of the iptables chain that whitelists all traffic
> initiated from someone on ethY being routed to ethX should do the trick.
>
> iptables -I FORWARDING --in-interface ethY -j ACCEPT
> iptables -t nat -I POSTROU
On Sun, 2006-08-27 at 20:42 +0200, Nicolas "Ikke" Trangez wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-08-27 at 07:51 -0400, Saikat Guha wrote:
> > Would NM be the appropriate place to have "connection sharing" that
> > just
> > works?
> Having this functionality somewhere in
On 8/27/06, Saikat Guha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would NM be the appropriate place to have "connection sharing" that just
> works?
Possibly that would be up to the developers to decide but Firestarter
claims to do this now if the fun
On Sun, 2006-08-27 at 07:51 -0400, Saikat Guha wrote:
> Would NM be the appropriate place to have "connection sharing" that
> just
> works?
Having this functionality somewhere in the stack would be great, *but*
setting up NAT in iptables is very dependant on existring chains/
Would NM be the appropriate place to have "connection sharing" that just
works?
Provide bridging or NAT'ing to the interface connected.
wi-fi to wired bridging: allow laptop connected to the net over wireless
to provide internet access to another laptop (or lan) connected thro
80 matches
Mail list logo
