Re: LEAP, and other EAPs.

2007-07-15 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 09:14 -0400, Dan Williams wrote: On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 19:19 -0400, Darren Albers wrote: I think Cisco is just acknowledging the obvious and longstanding weaknesses in LEAP and is doing the right thing and advising their customers to move to PEAP which works the same

Re: LEAP, and other EAPs.

2007-07-15 Thread Darren Albers
On 7/15/07, Aaron Konstam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 09:14 -0400, Dan Williams wrote: On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 19:19 -0400, Darren Albers wrote: I think Cisco is just acknowledging the obvious and longstanding weaknesses in LEAP and is doing the right thing and advising

Re: LEAP, and other EAPs.

2007-07-15 Thread Dan Williams
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 10:52 -0400, Darren Albers wrote: On 7/15/07, Aaron Konstam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 09:14 -0400, Dan Williams wrote: On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 19:19 -0400, Darren Albers wrote: I think Cisco is just acknowledging the obvious and longstanding

Re: LEAP, and other EAPs.

2007-07-15 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 13:20 -0400, Dan Williams wrote: Second, if NM advertises it supports LEAP it should support LEAP. Until last week it did not at least on Fedora 7. It did support it but a patch broke it, it wasn't caught since you can't test LEAP without Cisco AP's or a LEAP