On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 10:40 -0800, Bert Haverkamp wrote:
> Hello Dan,
>
> >So, I strongly suggest to hold off playing with PPP and instead wait for
> >some
> >shiny glittering features coming out soon...
>
> I'm a bit confused by this threat's ending. What is this spiffy feautre we
> are waiting
pport of this modem (the Dell 5530 in my
case)
with network-manager?
Regards,
Bert
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Mobile-Broadband---how-do-I-trace-debug-the-modem-initialisation--tp20046325p20839711.html
Sent from the Gnome - NetworkManager mailing list ar
Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 08:39 +0200, Craig Main wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 00:38 +0100, Rick Jones wrote:
--On Tuesday, October 21, 2008 14:08:25 -0400 Dan Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
¦ On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 19:16 +0200, Main, Craig wrote:
..
¦ > --> Mode
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 08:39 +0200, Craig Main wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 00:38 +0100, Rick Jones wrote:
> > --On Tuesday, October 21, 2008 14:08:25 -0400 Dan Williams
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ¦ On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 19:16 +0200, Main, Craig wrote:
> > ..
> > ¦ > --> Modem initiali
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 00:38 +0100, Rick Jones wrote:
> --On Tuesday, October 21, 2008 14:08:25 -0400 Dan Williams
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ¦ On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 19:16 +0200, Main, Craig wrote:
> ..
> ¦ > --> Modem initialized.
> ¦ > --> Sending: ATDT*99***1#
> ¦ > --> Waiting for carri
--On Tuesday, October 21, 2008 14:08:25 -0400 Dan Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
¦ On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 19:16 +0200, Main, Craig wrote:
..
¦ > --> Modem initialized.
¦ > --> Sending: ATDT*99***1#
¦ > --> Waiting for carrier.
¦ > ATDT*99***1#
¦ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] }9}#}%B#}%}(}"}'}"}"}&}
--On Tuesday, October 21, 2008 09:21:36 -0400 Dan Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
¦ > Inelegant though it is, i think NM does need a way to define custom
¦ > init (& de-init?) strings externally. This has been the bane of
¦
¦ God no. It's like adding text boxes for arbitrary command line
¦ a
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 19:16 +0200, Main, Craig wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tambet Ingo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tue 10/21/2008 11:19 AM
> To: Per Hallsmark
> Cc: Main, Craig; networkmanager-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: Mobile Broadband - how do I
-Original Message-
From: Tambet Ingo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 10/21/2008 11:19 AM
To: Per Hallsmark
Cc: Main, Craig; networkmanager-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: Mobile Broadband - how do I trace/debug the modem initialisation?
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Per Hallsmark
Dan Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 15:48 +0200, Per Hallsmark wrote:
Dan Williams wrote:
Mobile broadband parts are a lot more standardized than
"Hayes-compatible" modems.
Ehm... not sure I agree...
How many different type of broadband modems does NM/MM support?
(note
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 15:48 +0200, Per Hallsmark wrote:
> Dan Williams wrote:
> > Mobile broadband parts are a lot more standardized than
> > "Hayes-compatible" modems.
> >
>
> Ehm... not sure I agree...
>
> How many different type of broadband modems does NM/MM support?
> (note not rebranded
Dan Williams wrote:
Mobile broadband parts are a lot more standardized than
"Hayes-compatible" modems.
Ehm... not sure I agree...
How many different type of broadband modems does NM/MM support?
(note not rebranded but *different*...)
/Per
___
N
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 10:54 +0200, Craig Main wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 10:47 +0200, Per Hallsmark wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The 5530 string triggers me... :-)
> > I would believe it to be some other vendor than broadcom.
> >
> > It probably would be supported by the mbm plugin.
> > The reason
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 10:39 +0100, Rick Jones wrote:
> --On Tuesday, October 21, 2008 09:50:35 +0100 Stuart Ward
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ¦ The issue is that you have enabled unsolicited response codes.
> Several possable solutions
> ¦ 1) add +CREG=0 to your init string to disable.
> ¦ 2)
--On Tuesday, October 21, 2008 09:50:35 +0100 Stuart Ward
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
¦ The issue is that you have enabled unsolicited response codes. Several
possable solutions
¦ 1) add +CREG=0 to your init string to disable.
¦ 2) perhaps nm should be able to parse the response string and matc
--On Tuesday, October 21, 2008 11:58:58 +0300 Tambet Ingo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
¦ What? The issue is that there's a modem that does not like 'Z' (reset)
¦ command. It has nothing to do with +CREG or unsolicited response
¦ codes. We're talking about modem initialization, registration comes
¦
-- Stuart Ward M +44 7782325143
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Tambet Ingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Stuart Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The issue is that you have enabled unsolicited response codes. Several
> > possable solutions
> > 1) add +CREG=0
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Per Hallsmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, this is definitly a modem that falls into the mbm plugin.
> I've submitted a patch for it earlier to this list, although that
> one requires another NetworkManager patch (changing a bit
> how iface/ip_iface is used) a
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 11:14 +0200, Per Hallsmark wrote:
> Hello Craig,
>
> Yes, this is definitly a modem that falls into the mbm plugin.
> I've submitted a patch for it earlier to this list, although that
> one requires another NetworkManager patch (changing a bit
> how iface/ip_iface is used) a
Hello Craig,
Yes, this is definitly a modem that falls into the mbm plugin.
I've submitted a patch for it earlier to this list, although that
one requires another NetworkManager patch (changing a bit
how iface/ip_iface is used) as well as a driver which unfortunally
isn't submitted yet (but will
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Stuart Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The issue is that you have enabled unsolicited response codes. Several
> possable solutions
> 1) add +CREG=0 to your init string to disable.
> 2) perhaps nm should be able to parse the response string and match it to a
> reg
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 10:47 +0200, Per Hallsmark wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The 5530 string triggers me... :-)
> I would believe it to be some other vendor than broadcom.
>
> It probably would be supported by the mbm plugin.
> The reason you get errors on atz is because it uses at&f instead (an
> alias s
The issue is that you have enabled unsolicited response codes. Several
possable solutions
1) add +CREG=0 to your init string to disable.
2) perhaps nm should be able to parse the response string and match it to a
regex expression rather than a fixed string. What is important is the the
modem is reg
Hi,
The 5530 string triggers me... :-)
I would believe it to be some other vendor than broadcom.
It probably would be supported by the mbm plugin.
The reason you get errors on atz is because it uses at&f instead (an
alias sort of to atz)
Also, the modem comes up with cfun=4 (rf disabled) and an
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Craig Main <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> atz
> ERROR
> ATE1 V1 X4 &C1 +FCLASS=0
> OK
> ATZ E0 V1
> ERROR
Ah, so it is the reset command, thank you. We've been trying to avoid
workarounds for different modems to NetworkManager so unfortunately
for now, you'll need t
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 11:03 +0300, Tambet Ingo wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Craig Main <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am having a similar issue on my Dell Latitude E6500 which has a Broadcom
> > 5530 buildin hsdpa minicard. This device gives an ERROR when sent an ATZ
> > command. U
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Craig Main <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having a similar issue on my Dell Latitude E6500 which has a Broadcom
> 5530 buildin hsdpa minicard. This device gives an ERROR when sent an ATZ
> command. Using a chat script or wvdial with a cusomized wvdial.conf file
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 13:26 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 17:55 +0300, Tambet Ingo wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Rick Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Where are the actual dialling protocol exchanges defined - are they
> > > hard-coded? Not being able to sc
--On Monday, October 20, 2008 13:25:37 -0400 Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
¦ >
¦ > So it's a bug in the Palm - I'll have to chase it up with the authors.
¦
¦ Probably; NM does retries for some commands that time out. Whats the
¦ command that times out for you, the first ATZ E0 or somet
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 17:55 +0300, Tambet Ingo wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Rick Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Where are the actual dialling protocol exchanges defined - are they
> > hard-coded? Not being able to script this bit of the connection seems to be
> > problematic, com
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 17:12 +0100, Rick Jones wrote:
> --On Monday, October 20, 2008 17:55:12 +0300 Tambet Ingo
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ¦ If you have recent enough NM (r4155 or newer), you can turn on
> serial
> ¦ debug with NM_SERIAL_DEBUG environment variable. The AT commands are
> ¦ hard
On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 12:59 +0100, Rick Jones wrote:
> I have NM 0.7 running on Ubuntu - works fine with LAN & wireless, but
> I can't get it to talk to a GPRS modem properly. Here's the scenario:
>
> The device is a Palm Treo with Mobile Stream's "USB Modem" installed.
> This offers a standard mo
--On Monday, October 20, 2008 17:55:12 +0300 Tambet Ingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
¦ If you have recent enough NM (r4155 or newer), you can turn on serial
¦ debug with NM_SERIAL_DEBUG environment variable. The AT commands are
¦ hard coded and there are no plans to leave it to users to figure out
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Rick Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where are the actual dialling protocol exchanges defined - are they
> hard-coded? Not being able to script this bit of the connection seems to be
> problematic, compared to pppd. I'd really like to move to NM instead of
> mess
I have NM 0.7 running on Ubuntu - works fine with LAN & wireless, but I
can't get it to talk to a GPRS modem properly. Here's the scenario:
The device is a Palm Treo with Mobile Stream's "USB Modem" installed. This
offers a standard modem interface on the USB port, and I can make this work
fin
35 matches
Mail list logo
