On 02/13/2012 09:33 PM, Andrew Bird (Sphere Systems) wrote:
Will this redesign allow you to change the udev rule assigned names
from
ID_MM_ZTE_PORT_TYPE_MODEM
to
ID_MM_PORT_TYPE_MODEM
etc? I don't think there can be any clash requiring a different namespace as
the items are fully
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 13:02 +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
On 02/13/2012 09:33 PM, Andrew Bird (Sphere Systems) wrote:
Will this redesign allow you to change the udev rule assigned names
from
ID_MM_ZTE_PORT_TYPE_MODEM
to
ID_MM_PORT_TYPE_MODEM
etc? I don't think there can be any
On Tuesday 14 February 2012, Dan Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 13:02 +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
On 02/13/2012 09:33 PM, Andrew Bird (Sphere Systems) wrote:
Will this redesign allow you to change the udev rule assigned names
from
ID_MM_ZTE_PORT_TYPE_MODEM
to
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 18:54 +, Andrew Bird (Sphere Systems) wrote:
On Tuesday 14 February 2012, Dan Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 13:02 +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
On 02/13/2012 09:33 PM, Andrew Bird (Sphere Systems) wrote:
Will this redesign allow you to change the
Hey Dan,
I really do like the new approach, and I would even include it for
0.5.x. Some comments below.
The core problem was that some devices need to specify a PPP port that's
*not* the primary port. In these cases the primary port always stays
open for command and status, while some other
On Monday 13 February 2012, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
Hey Dan,
I really do like the new approach, and I would even include it for
0.5.x. Some comments below.
The core problem was that some devices need to specify a PPP port that's
*not* the primary port. In these cases the primary port
On 02/13/2012 08:37 PM, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
Hey Dan,
I really do like the new approach, and I would even include it for
0.5.x. Some comments below.
I ported this new behaviour to a new '06-api-ports' branch upstream;
will wait for more comments before merging it into '06-api'.
--
Hi,
The core problem was that some devices need to specify a PPP port that's
*not* the primary port. In these cases the primary port always stays
open for command and status, while some other port is used for PPP.
This is different than the current model where the primary port is used
for
