Hey Dan!
Thanks for the reply and the link. Some if it I've done - that is, I've used
the daily builds and I have did that
thing with the interfaces thing. I will try the rest when I come home. As
stated in the bug, the authorization
problem happens every 2-3 days so whether it worked or not I migh
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 14:04 +0300, Louigi Verona wrote:
> I have located a similar bug and have replied there:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600455
>
> And also have created a more detailed bug - a bit different, because
> it was AFTER I installed a daily build. Here:
> https://bugz
I have located a similar bug and have replied there:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600455
And also have created a more detailed bug - a bit different, because it was
AFTER I installed a daily build. Here:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=603029
Please, tell me if any additi
Hello everyone!
It's been more than a week since I wrote to this mailing list asking for
help. I've been asked to provide logs. I have provided them. What else
should I do for the developers to take a look at the problem?
I cannot connect normally to the Internet since I've upgraded to Ubuntu 9.1
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:49:57PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 09:36 +, Cian Masterson wrote:
> > 2009/11/17 Louigi Verona :
> > > 2. When I boot the system, NM would try to automatically connect to some
> > > Wired connection lfupdown (eth1). It seems to be there by defa
Hey guys!
Earlier on this mail list I have left links to launchpad where people
reported an "Insufficient privileges" bug. They left lots of logs. In
the end of this letter I leave these links once more.
Can someone please look into this matter? It hasn't been resolved and
I continue to experience
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 13:53 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Dan Williams wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 13:38 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MES
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 13:53 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 13:38 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Dan Williams wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 20
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 13:38 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Dan Williams wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 08:59 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MES
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 13:38 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 08:59 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Dan Williams wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 20
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 08:59 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Dan Williams wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 16:17 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MES
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 08:59 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 16:17 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Dan Williams wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 20
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 16:17 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 00:00 +0300, Louigi Verona wrote:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 16:17 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Dan Williams wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 00:00 +0300, Louigi Verona wrote:
Hey, Dan!
Thanks for th
Okay, guys!
Here are the links to bugs which were reported to launchpad concerning
problems with NM in Ubuntu Karmic:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-applet/+bug/462944-
this report has logs
This is a duplicate with logs and txt files.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 15:33 -0600, Trey Nolen wrote:
> My big issue in Karmic is that I can't join "hidden" networks - even
> if I know the SSID and the passphrase. This seems to be a regression
> from the earlier versions of Ubuntu.
I just put together http://live.gnome.org/NetworkManager/Debugg
Louigi Verona wrote:
This is something I understand completely. But those bugs have been
reported in great detail with logs and everything in launchpad. If it
would be helpful I can find them in launchpad and place links here.
Would it be helpful?
Yes, that would be helpful, especially if you
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 15:33 -0600, Trey Nolen wrote:
> My big issue in Karmic is that I can't join "hidden" networks - even
> if I know the SSID and the passphrase. This seems to be a regression
> from the earlier versions of Ubuntu.
What driver and hardware? Does the BSSID of your AP show up if
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Louigi Verona wrote:
> Okay, so please tell me how I can help the situation. I am keen on solving
> this and I am ready to spend my time and effort to deliver what is needed to
> understand the nature of the problem and to deliver the necessary info to
> the develo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm actually able to connect to these now if I do "iwlist scan
essid " -- knetworkmanager wakes right up and connects to them.
Not sure if it was that way in Jaunty, as I don't know that I ever
attempted it.
Trey Nolen wrote:
> My big issue in Karmic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 16:17 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Dan Williams wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 00:00 +0300, Louigi Verona wrote:
Hey, Dan!
Thanks for th
My big issue in Karmic is that I can't join "hidden" networks - even if
I know the SSID and the passphrase. This seems to be a regression from
the earlier versions of Ubuntu.
I have seen reports of it on Launchpad, but so far the importance of the
issue is "undetermined". I think it is fairl
Okay, so please tell me how I can help the situation. I am keen on solving
this and I am ready to spend my time and effort to deliver what is needed to
understand the nature of the problem and to deliver the necessary info to
the developers.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 16:17 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 00:00 +0300, Louigi Verona wrote:
> >> Hey, Dan!
> >> Thanks for the advice. I am certainly keen on helping the community to
> >> solve the
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 00:09 +0300, Louigi Verona wrote:
> This is something I understand completely. But those bugs have been
> reported in great detail with logs and everything in launchpad. If it
> would be helpful I can find them in launchpad and place links here.
> Would it be helpful?
Right,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 00:00 +0300, Louigi Verona wrote:
>> Hey, Dan!
>> Thanks for the advice. I am certainly keen on helping the community to
>> solve the problem, but the bug had been reported to launchpad with
>> like a dozen d
This is something I understand completely. But those bugs have been reported
in great detail with logs and everything in launchpad. If it would be
helpful I can find them in launchpad and place links here. Would it be
helpful?
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 00:00 +0300, Louigi Verona wrote:
> Hey, Dan!
> Thanks for the advice. I am certainly keen on helping the community to
> solve the problem, but the bug had been reported to launchpad with
> like a dozen duplicates. The daily builds were suggested as partial
> fix but since the
Hey, Dan!
Thanks for the advice. I am certainly keen on helping the community to solve
the problem, but the bug had been reported to launchpad with like a dozen
duplicates. The daily builds were suggested as partial fix but since then I
could get no information from anywhere and bug reports on laun
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 09:36 +, Cian Masterson wrote:
> 2009/11/17 Louigi Verona :
> > 2. When I boot the system, NM would try to automatically connect to some
> > Wired connection lfupdown (eth1). It seems to be there by default. Since I
> > have no wired connection, it of course, always fails.
2009/11/17 Louigi Verona :
> 2. When I boot the system, NM would try to automatically connect to some
> Wired connection lfupdown (eth1). It seems to be there by default. Since I
> have no wired connection, it of course, always fails. I cannot edit it, the
> Edit button is grayed out when I select
Hey guys!
I just signed up to this mailing list, so I bet after an upgrade to Karmic a
lot of people posted on the bug in Network Manager that said "insufficient
priviliges" and did not allow people to connect to DSL.
I have three questions regarding this issue.
1. After having installed the "pa
32 matches
Mail list logo
