Hello,
I just experienced the situation described below again. Still don't know
why NM would behave differently if resolv.conf first came via dhcp.
Thanks for your help.
--
TH
On 3/23/20 10:59 AM, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
On 3/16/20 4:56 PM, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
Hello
actually I was able to re
On 3/16/20 4:56 PM, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
Hello
actually I was able to reproduce the thing in a simplier way:
Hello, did you have the time to look into this ?
thanks.
--
TH.
0/ I'm starting from here
##
- configuration : no 'dns=' directive :
- an auto profile
- a
Hello Thomas,
actually I was able to reproduce the thing in a simplier way:
0/ I'm starting from here
##
- configuration : no 'dns=' directive :
- an auto profile
- a manual profile (active)
- an empty /etc/resolv.conf
# grep -i dns /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.co
On 3/16/20 1:30 PM, Thomas Haller wrote:
I am not sure from the description. To be sure level=TRACE logging and
check the logfile.
But I think the reason is that NetworkManager doesn't want to write an
empty /etc/resolv.conf file. If Networkmanager has no nameservers, it
doesn't seem very usefu
On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 09:36 +0100, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
>
> > What I don't understand is that, then if I manually remove the
> > 'dns=none' setting and either restart NM and/or reload+reactivate
> > the
> > profile, /etc/resolv.conf is not, as I was expecting, emptied by
> > NM.
Hi,
I am not
On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 15:04 +0100, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
> On 3/12/20 2:05 PM, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
>
> I forgot a silly question :
>
> is it legit to have in conf.d/foobar.conf another, let's say [main]
> section : will it be merged with the one in NetworkManager.conf ?
Hi,
Yes, they will be m
On 3/12/20 2:05 PM, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
Hello Thomas, Hello everybody,
In short : in a setup where I don't state any 'dns=' NM directive, I
don't understand why /etc/resolv.conf (file, not symlink) is not overriden.
Sorry to insist : any insight about this ?
thanks for your help...
I'm ru
On 3/12/20 2:05 PM, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
I forgot a silly question :
is it legit to have in conf.d/foobar.conf another, let's say [main]
section : will it be merged with the one in NetworkManager.conf ?
Thanks
--
TH
___
networkmanager-list mailing
Hello Thomas, Hello everybody,
In short : in a setup where I don't state any 'dns=' NM directive, I
don't understand why /etc/resolv.conf (file, not symlink) is not overriden.
I'm running CentOS-8.1 on HPC compute nodes provisionned by the xCAT
software.
Basically nodes PXE-boot and download
