On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 18:22 +0200, Ohad Lutzky wrote:
On Dec 25, 2007 4:03 PM, Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 10:29 +0200, Ohad Lutzky wrote:
Hi Dan,
Thanks for the info. A few questions -
* Is there any chance indeed that the feature will be
Thank you dan! We will probably be testing those this week as well.
On Dec 27, 2007 10:16 AM, Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 18:22 +0200, Ohad Lutzky wrote:
On Dec 25, 2007 4:03 PM, Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 10:29 +0200, Ohad
On Dec 25, 2007 4:03 PM, Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 10:29 +0200, Ohad Lutzky wrote:
Hi Dan,
Thanks for the info. A few questions -
* Is there any chance indeed that the feature will be backported into
wpa_supplicant 0.5.x? Or is it a big restructuring
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 18:22 +0200, Ohad Lutzky wrote:
On Dec 25, 2007 4:03 PM, Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 10:29 +0200, Ohad Lutzky wrote:
Hi Dan,
Thanks for the info. A few questions -
* Is there any chance indeed that the feature will be
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 18:22 +0200, Ohad Lutzky wrote:
On Dec 25, 2007 4:03 PM, Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 10:29 +0200, Ohad Lutzky wrote:
Hi Dan,
Thanks for the info. A few questions -
* Is there any chance indeed that the feature will be
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 10:55 +0200, Ohad Lutzky wrote:
Hi all,
Apparently it's not a WPA issue after all. Please check patch attached here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/112009/comments/12
Contrary to the bug report, it's _totally_ a wpa_supplicant issue.
