2009/12/2 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 12:36 +0100, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
Any progress on this front? :)
Yes. I'm finishing up the modem states changes (an internal
implementation detail of MM) at which point I'll be applying a previous
patch for DTR toggling
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 12:36 +0100, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
2009/11/2 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 15:01 +0100, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
2009/10/26 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 15:01 +0100, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
2009/10/26 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 13:36 +0100, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
Also I'm having reliability problems with PPP devices and
2009/10/26 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 13:36 +0100, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
Also I'm having reliability problems with PPP devices and
Simple.Connect, first attempt will work (most of the time) but the
second will never.
That may be because the data session is
2009/10/26 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 13:36 +0100, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
2009/10/26 Pablo Martí Gamboa pma...@warp.es
2009/10/9 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 10:33 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa
2009/10/9 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 10:33 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
I forgot to mention that when I press Disconnect from nm-applet,
that just issues an Enable(false) to the device rather than
Disconnect(); Enable(false);, I asked yesterday in #nm and
2009/10/26 Pablo Martí Gamboa pma...@warp.es
2009/10/9 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 10:33 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
I forgot to mention that when I press Disconnect from nm-applet,
that just issues an Enable(false) to the device rather than
2009/10/26 Pablo Martí Gamboa pma...@warp.es
2009/10/9 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 10:33 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
I forgot to mention that when I press Disconnect from nm-applet,
that just issues an Enable(false) to the device rather than
: Problem with Simple.Connect
2009/10/26 Pablo Martí Gamboa pma...@warp.es
2009/10/9 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 10:33 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
I forgot
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 11:52 +0200, Peter Holik wrote:
Dan Williams schrieb:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 21:48 +0200, Peter Holik wrote:
As reported at ubuntu:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-widget-networkmanagement/+bug/334122/comments/44
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 13:36 +0100, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
2009/10/26 Pablo Martí Gamboa pma...@warp.es
2009/10/9 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 10:33 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa
wrote:
Dan Williams schrieb:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 21:48 +0200, Peter Holik wrote:
As reported at ubuntu:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-widget-networkmanagement/+bug/334122/comments/44
network-manager-0.8~a~git.20091013t193206.679d548
did not work for me i got:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 21:48 +0200, Peter Holik wrote:
As reported at ubuntu:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-widget-networkmanagement/+bug/334122/comments/44
network-manager-0.8~a~git.20091013t193206.679d548
did not work for me i got:
NetworkManager: WARN
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 14:16 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
2009/10/14 Pablo Martí Gamboa pma...@warp.es
2009/10/13 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 10:00 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa
wrote:
As reported at ubuntu:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-widget-networkmanagement/+bug/334122/comments/44
network-manager-0.8~a~git.20091013t193206.679d548
did not work for me i got:
NetworkManager: WARN pppd_timed_out(): Looks like pppd didn't initialize our
dbus module
i
Dan Williams wrote:
But with DTR and without ATH, isn't the connection still active? It
thought DTR transitions just broke into command mode so you *could* run
ATH. I didn't think they terminated an active data connection too...
In the olden days of dialup modems, dropping DTR was the
: Eugene Crosser [mailto:cros...@average.org]
Sent: 14 October 2009 07:05
To: Dan Williams
Cc: Pablo Martí Gamboa; Herriot, Nicholas, VF-Group;
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: Problem with Simple.Connect
Dan Williams wrote:
But with DTR and without ATH, isn't the connection still active
: Problem with Simple.Connect
Dan Williams wrote:
But with DTR and without ATH, isn't the connection still active? It
thought DTR transitions just broke into command mode so you *could*
run ATH. I didn't think they terminated an active data connection too...
In the olden days of dialup
2009/10/13 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 10:00 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
The puzzling thing is that the very first time it will connect no
problem, it is the second and third attempts that fail. Nothing in the
wader log indicates that there's been a problem
2009/10/14 Pablo Martí Gamboa pma...@warp.es
2009/10/13 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 10:00 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
The puzzling thing is that the very first time it will connect no
problem, it is the second and third attempts that fail. Nothing in the
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 10:00 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
2009/10/9 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 09:02 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
2009/10/7 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 10:03 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
2009/10/9 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 10:33 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
2009/10/8 Pablo Martí Gamboa pma...@warp.es
2009/10/9 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 09:02 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
2009/10/7 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 12:43 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
Hi all,
I'm getting a unreliable behavior with
2009/10/9 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 10:33 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
2009/10/8 Pablo Martí Gamboa pma...@warp.es
2009/10/7 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 12:43 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa
2009/10/7 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 12:43 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
Hi all,
I'm getting a unreliable behavior with Simple.Connect, the first call
will succeed, but further calls won't.
Going through the logs with Tambet, we have noticed that there is
2009/10/8 Pablo Martí Gamboa pma...@warp.es
2009/10/7 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 12:43 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
Hi all,
I'm getting a unreliable behavior with Simple.Connect, the first call
will succeed, but further calls won't.
Going through the
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 09:02 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
2009/10/7 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 12:43 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
Hi all,
I'm getting a unreliable behavior with Simple.Connect, the
first call
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 10:33 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
2009/10/8 Pablo Martí Gamboa pma...@warp.es
2009/10/7 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 12:43 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa
wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 12:43 +0200, Pablo Martí Gamboa wrote:
Hi all,
I'm getting a unreliable behavior with Simple.Connect, the first call
will succeed, but further calls won't.
Going through the logs with Tambet, we have noticed that there is
something weird going on with IPv6 code:
I
29 matches
Mail list logo
